| Literature DB >> 25889712 |
Zul Kamal1,2, Farhat Ullah3, Muhammad Ayaz4, Abdul Sadiq5, Sajjad Ahmad6, Anwar Zeb7, Abid Hussain8, Muhammad Imran9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atriplex laciniata L. was investigated for phenolic, flavonoid contents, antioxidant, anticholinesterase activities, in an attempt to explore its effectiveness in Alzheimer's and other neurological disorders. Plant crude methanolic extract (Al.MeF), subsequent fractions; n-hexane (Al.HxF), chloroform (Al.CfF), ethyl acetate (Al.EaF), aqueous (Al.WtF), Saponins (Al.SPF) and Flavonoids (Al.FLVF) were investigated for DPPH, ABTS and H2O2 free radical scavenging activities. Further these extracts were subjected to acetylcholinesterase (AChE) & butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitory activities using Ellman's assay. Phenolic and Flavonoid contents were determined and expressed in mg Gallic acid GAE/g and Rutin RTE/g of samples respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25889712 PMCID: PMC4393635 DOI: 10.1186/s40659-015-0011-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Res ISSN: 0716-9760 Impact factor: 5.612
Total phenolics and flavonoids contents of crude methanolic and their subsequent fractions of
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| 311.32 ± 0.54 | 144.37 ± 0.52 |
|
| 152.59 ± 0.48 | 14.38 ± 0.51 |
|
| 231.12 ± 0.58 | 160.41 ± 0.55 |
|
| 278.79 ± 0.45 | 52.33 ± 0.46 |
|
| 190.62 ± 0.62 | 82.25 ± 0.55 |
GAE = galic acid equivalent, RTE = rutin equivalent, each value in the table is represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3).
Results of antioxidant potential of against DPPH and ABTS free Radicals using ascorbic acid as standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al.MeF | 1000 | 83.23 ± 0.44** | 82 | 81.49 ± 0.60*** | 70 |
| 500 | 79.50 ± 0.61 ns | 75.45 ± 0.59** | |||
| 250 | 68.47 ± 0.46*** | 64.52 ± 0.60*** | |||
| 125 | 53.47 ± 0.70*** | 57.58 ± 0.57*** | |||
| Al.HxF | 1000 | 65.57 ± 0.43*** | 270 | 69.90 ± 1.04 *** | 215 |
| 500 | 58.12 ± 0.94*** | 61.53 ± 0.65*** | |||
| 250 | 48.76 ± 1.09*** | 52.20 ± 1.04*** | |||
| 125 | 34.38 ± 0.50*** | 40.50 ± 0.73*** | |||
| Al.CfF | 1000 | 74.50 ± 0.56*** | 210 | 83.42 ± 0.57*** | 190 |
| 500 | 61.40 ± 0.55*** | 72.32 ± 0.52*** | |||
| 250 | 52.36 ± 0.57*** | 58.27 ± 0.57*** | |||
| 125 | 43.30 ± 0.52*** | 37.30 ± 0.64*** | |||
| Al.EaF | 1000 | 69.37 ± 0.58*** | 382 | 76.34 ± 0.63*** | 360 |
| 500 | 62.29 ± 0.43*** | 67.54 ± 0.46*** | |||
| 250 | 24.58 ± 0.56*** | 33.48 ± 0.60*** | |||
| 125 | 17.39 ± 0.60*** | 28.52 ± 0.66*** | |||
| Al.WtF | 1000 | 67.83 ± 1.07*** | 210 | 69.37 ± 1.10*** | 310 |
| 500 | 61.56 ± 0.69*** | 57.56 ± 0.45*** | |||
| 250 | 52.48 ± 0.54*** | 46.36 ± 0.55*** | |||
| 125 | 40.90 ± 1.16*** | 35.57 ± 0.84*** | |||
| Al.SPF | 1000 | 83.37 ± 0.52** | 83 | 78.40 ± 0.51*** | 92 |
| 500 | 73.38 ± 0.76*** | 71.44 ± 0.55*** | |||
| 250 | 67.24 ± 0.80*** | 63.47 ± 0.52*** | |||
| 125 | 54.40 ± 0.76*** | 52.39 ± 0.49*** | |||
| Al.FLVF | 1000 | 89.41 ± 0.55 ns | 33 | 90.34 ± 0.55 ns | 30 |
| 500 | 83.27 ± 0.58 ns | 86.36 ± 0.49*** | |||
| 250 | 76.35 ± 0.51 ns | 73.52 ± 0.62 ns | |||
| 125 | 63.28 ± 0.57 * | 67.42 ± 0.55 ns | |||
| Ascorbic Acid | 1000 | 87.90 ± 0.96 | 14 | 89.30 ± 0.61 | 37 |
| 500 | 83.08 ± 0.47 | 80.37 ± 0.54 | |||
| 250 | 79.85 ± 2.24 | 73.37 ± 0.64 | |||
| 125 | 67.36 ± 0.57 | 64.45 ± 0.65 |
Values significantly different as compared to positive control, *:P < 0.05, **:P < 0.01, ***:P < 0.001, ns: P >0.05. Values expressed as Percent inhibition (Mean ± SEM of n = 3) and IC50.
Figure 1Antioxidant assay of plant extracts using H 0 assay. Values represent percent radical scavenging (mean ± SEM) of three replicates. Values significantly different as compare to positive control *:P < 0.05, **:P < 0.01 and ***:P < 0.001.
Figure 2IC values For antioxidant activity of Plant extracts using H O assay.
Figure 3Correlation coefficients (R ) of antioxidant activity, for total phenolic vs DPPH (A) , total phenolic vs ABTS (C) , total phenolic vs H O (E) and flavonoid contents Vs DPPH (B) , flavonoid contents Vs ABTS (D) and flavonoid contents Vs H O (F) in crude various fractions of L.
AChE & BChE inhibitiory potentials of plant extracts using galanthamine as standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1000 | 78.65 ± 0.70*** | 280 | 82.68 ± 0.60*** | 220 |
| 500 | 67.25 ± 0.55*** | 69.42 ± 0.60*** | |||
| 250 | 47.21 ± 0.62*** | 52.51 ± 0.66*** | |||
| 125 | 31.55 ± 0.56*** | 41.27 ± 0.62*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 72.51 ± 0.62*** | 64.36 ± 0.61*** | 400 | |
| 500 | 63.44 ± 0.44*** | 310 | 53.40 ± 0.52*** | ||
| 250 | 42.46 ± 0.47*** | 39.46 ± 0.60*** | |||
| 125 | 23.68 ± 0.64*** | 22.52 ± 0.49*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 67.42 ± 0.46 *** | 83.49 ± 0.46*** | 160 | |
| 500 | 53.53 ± 0.41*** | 390 | 72.48 ± 0.50*** | ||
| 250 | 40.62 ± 0.69*** | 59.59 ± 0.66*** | |||
| 125 | 18.46 ± 0.67*** | 45.57 ± 0.63*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 77.45 ± 0.55 *** | 74.41 ± 0.60*** | 260 | |
| 500 | 57.63 ± 0.64*** | 270 | 61.53 ± 0.71*** | ||
| 250 | 48.45 ± 0.66 *** | 49.45 ± 0.77*** | |||
| 125 | 36.36 ± 0.50*** | 31.75 ± 0.58*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 72.44 ± 0.58*** | 78.62 ± 0.36*** | 210 | |
| 500 | 60.51 ± 0.59*** | 263 | 69.22 ± 0.47*** | ||
| 250 | 48.62 ± 0.70*** | 52.52 ± 0.71*** | |||
| 125 | 31.47 ± 0.55*** | 43.52 ± 0.70*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 84.36 ± 0.64 *** | 80.37 ± 0.54*** | 120 | |
| 500 | 77.34 ± 0.65*** | 90 | 73.44 ± 0.50*** | ||
| 250 | 65.58 ± 0.67*** | 62.51 ± 0.72*** | |||
| 125 | 53.60 ± 0.50*** | 49.28 ± 0.61*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 88.31 ± 0.57ns | 85.46 ± 0.62*** | 100 | |
| 500 | 79.46 ± 0.63 * | 70 | 76.58 ± 0.69*** | ||
| 250 | 67.53 ± 0.49 *** | 65.68 ± 0.42*** | |||
| 125 | 59.38 ± 0.50ns | 52.46 ± 0.72*** | |||
|
| 1000 | 91.37 ± 0.65 | 94.50 ± 0.71 | 47 | |
| 500 | 83.33 ± 0.55 | 52 | 85.47 ± 0.59 | ||
| 250 | 73.31 ± 0.60 | 71.72 ± 0.51 | |||
| 125 | 61.32 ± 0.54 | 65.37 ± 0.69 |
Result expressed as % inhibition (mean ± SEM of n = 3) and IC50 values. Values significantly different as compared to positive control, *:P < 0.05, ***:P < 0.001, ns: P >0.05.