Literature DB >> 25468663

Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: an experimental verification study.

Ehsan Basafa1, Ryan J Murphy2, Yoshito Otake3, Michael D Kutzer4, Stephen M Belkoff5, Simon C Mears6, Mehran Armand2.   

Abstract

The risk of osteoporotic hip fractures may be reduced by augmenting susceptible femora with acrylic polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. Grossly filling the proximal femur with PMMA has shown promise, but the augmented bones can suffer from thermal necrosis or cement leakage, among other side effects. We hypothesized that, using subject-specific planning and computer-assisted augmentation, we can minimize cement volume while increasing bone strength and reducing the risk of fracture. We mechanically tested eight pairs of osteoporotic femora, after augmenting one from each pair following patient-specific planning reported earlier, which optimized cement distribution and strength increase. An average of 9.5(±1.7) ml of cement was injected in the augmented set. Augmentation significantly (P<0.05) increased the yield load by 33%, maximum load by 30%, yield energy by 118%, and maximum energy by 94% relative to the non-augmented controls. Also predicted yield loads correlated well (R(2)=0.74) with the experiments and, for augmented specimens, cement profiles were predicted with an average surface error of <2 mm, further validating our simulation techniques. Results of the current study suggest that subject-specific planning of femoroplasty reduces the risk of hip fracture while minimizing the amount of cement required.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cement augmentation; Femoroplasty; Mechanical test; Planning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25468663      PMCID: PMC4274194          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  26 in total

1.  Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: a combined evolutionary optimization and particle diffusion model approach.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; J Poutala
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Elastomer femoroplasty prevents hip fracture displacement In vitro biomechanical study comparing two minimal invasive femoroplasty techniques.

Authors:  T J van der Steenhoven; W Schaasberg; A C de Vries; E R Valstar; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Femoroplasty--augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement--feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential.

Authors:  J Beckmann; S J Ferguson; M Gebauer; C Luering; B Gasser; P Heini
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.242

5.  Distribution of contact force during impact to the hip.

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J Parkkari; P Kannus; M Palvanen; A Natri; J Vainio; H Aho; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Prevention of hip fracture in elderly people with use of a hip protector.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; S Niemi; M Pasanen; M Palvanen; M Järvinen; I Vuori
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Sequential hip fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  A F Dinah
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  The effect of cement placement on augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur.

Authors:  Edward G Sutter; Simon J Wall; Simon C Mears; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2010-09

10.  Energy absorption during impact on the proximal femur is affected by body mass index and flooring surface.

Authors:  Shivam Bhan; Iris C Levine; Andrew C Laing
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

2.  Fiducial-Free 2D/3D Registration for Robot-Assisted Femoroplasty.

Authors:  Cong Gao; Amirhossein Farvardin; Robert B Grupp; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Liuhong Ma; Mareike Thies; Mathias Unberath; Russell H Taylor; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2020-07-28

3.  Significance of preoperative planning for prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic hip: A computational modeling study.

Authors:  Amirhossein Farvardin; Ehsan Basafa; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A biomechanically-guided planning and execution paradigm for osteoporotic hip augmentation: Experimental evaluation of the biomechanics and temperature-rise.

Authors:  Amirhossein Farvardin; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Ryan J Murphy; Ehsan Basafa; Harpal Khanuja; Juluis K Oni; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.034

Review 5.  Unmet needs and current and future approaches for osteoporotic patients at high risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  Serge Ferrari; Jean-Yves Reginster; Maria Luisa Brandi; John A Kanis; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Jean-Marc Féron; Andreas Kurth; René Rizzoli
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  PRELIMINARY MECHANICAL TEST OF PROXIMAL FEMUR REINFORCEMENT WITH CEMENTED X-SHAPED PMMA.

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Welvis Soares Camargo; Ruben Jeri Aquino; Vincenzo Giordano; Aluízio Fernandes Bonavides; Antônio Carlos Shimano
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  EVALUATION OF A BONE REINFORCEMENT TECHNIQUE USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Lucas Carreiro DA Silva; Nathan Drumond Vasconcelos Godinho; Amirhossein Farvardin; Mehran Armand; Ana Patrícia DE Paula
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  Biomechanical Test after Hip Cannulated Screw Removal (in vitro Analysis).

Authors:  Anderson Freitas; Lucas S Ramos; Érgon Lab Dantas; Vincenzo Giordano Neto; Patrick F Godinho; Antônio C Shimano
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

9.  Discrete particle model for cement infiltration within open-cell structures: Prevention of osteoporotic fracture.

Authors:  Samuel Jesús Ramos-Infante; Amadeo Ten-Esteve; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; María Angeles Pérez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Static bending test after proximal femoral nail (PFN) removal - in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Leonardo Morais Paiva; Sílvio Leite de Macedo Neto; Diogo Ranier de Macedo Souto; George Neri Barros Ferreira; Hélio Ismael da Costa; Anderson Freitas
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.