Literature DB >> 9146804

Distribution of contact force during impact to the hip.

S N Robinovitch1, W C Hayes, T A McMahon.   

Abstract

Hip fracture is a common, costly, and debilitating injury occurring primarily in the elderly. Commonly viewed as a consequence of osteoporosis, it is less often appreciated that > 90% of hip fractures are caused by falls, and that fracture risk is governed not only by bone fragility, but also by the mechanics of the fall. Our goal is to develop experimental and mathematical models that describe the dynamics of impact to the hip during a fall, and explain the factors that influence hip contact force and fracture risk during a fall. In the current study, we used "pelvis release experiments" to test the hypothesis that, during a fall on the hip, two pathways exist for energy absorption and force generation at contact: a compressive load path directly in line with the hip, and a flexural load path due to deformation of muscles and ligaments peripheral to the hip. We also explored whether trunk position or muscle contraction influence the body's impact response and the magnitude of force applied to the hip during a fall. Our results suggest that only 15% of total impact force is distributed to structures peripheral to the hip and that peak forces directly applied to the hip are well within the fracture range of the elderly femur. We also found that impacting with the trunk upright significantly increases peak force applied to the hip, whereas muscle contraction has little effect. These results should have application in the development of fracture risk indices that incorporate both fall severity and bone fragility, and the design of interventions such as hip pads and energy-absorbing floors that attempt to reduce fracture risk by decreasing in-line stiffness and hip contact force during a fall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9146804     DOI: 10.1007/bf02684190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  11 in total

1.  Cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral neck both contribute to proximal femur failure load prediction.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; D M L Cooper; S Kontulainen; P Guy; B B Forster; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: a combined evolutionary optimization and particle diffusion model approach.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Effect of pre-impact movement strategies on the impact forces resulting from a lateral fall.

Authors:  J Lo; J A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The effects of pad geometry and material properties on the biomechanical effectiveness of 26 commercially available hip protectors.

Authors:  Andrew C Laing; Fabio Feldman; Mona Jalili; Chun Ming Jimmy Tsai; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: an experimental verification study.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Ryan J Murphy; Yoshito Otake; Michael D Kutzer; Stephen M Belkoff; Simon C Mears; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Effect of soft shell hip protectors on pressure distribution to the hip during sideways falls.

Authors:  A C Laing; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Hip protectors: recommendations for biomechanical testing--an international consensus statement (part I).

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; S L Evans; J Minns; A C Laing; P Kannus; P A Cripton; S Derler; S J Birge; D Plant; I D Cameron; D P Kiel; J Howland; K Khan; J B Lauritzen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Real-time human ambulation, activity, and physiological monitoring: taxonomy of issues, techniques, applications, challenges and limitations.

Authors:  Rinat Khusainov; Djamel Azzi; Ifeyinwa E Achumba; Sebastian D Bersch
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Mechanical Impedance and Its Relations to Motor Control, Limb Dynamics, and Motion Biomechanics.

Authors:  Joseph Mizrahi
Journal:  J Med Biol Eng       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 1.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.