Literature DB >> 31371101

Significance of preoperative planning for prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic hip: A computational modeling study.

Amirhossein Farvardin1, Ehsan Basafa2, Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad3, Mehran Armand4.   

Abstract

A potential effective treatment for prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures is augmentation of the mechanical properties of the femur by injecting it with bone cement. This therapy, however, is only in research stage and can benefit substantially from computational simulations to optimize the pattern of cement injection. Some studies have considered a patient-specific planning paradigm for Osteoporotic Hip Augmentation (OHA). Despite their biomechanical advantages, customized plans require advanced surgical systems for implementation. Other studies, therefore, have suggested a more generalized injection strategy. The goal of this study is to investigate as to whether the additional computational overhead of the patient-specific planning can significantly improve the bone strength as compared to the generalized injection strategies attempted in the literature. For this purpose, numerical models were developed from high resolution CT images (n = 4). Through finite element analysis and hydrodynamic simulations, we compared the biomechanical efficiency of the customized cement-based augmentation along with three generalized injection strategies developed previously. Two series of simulations were studied, one with homogeneous and one with inhomogeneous material properties for the osteoporotic bone. The customized cement-based augmentation inhomogeneous models showed that injection of only 10 ml of bone cement can significantly increase the yield load (79.6%, P < 0.01) and yield energy (199%, P < 0.01) of an osteoporotic femur. This increase is significantly higher than those of the generalized injections proposed previously (23.8% on average). Our findings suggest that OHA can significantly benefit from a patient-specific plan that determines the pattern and volume of the injected cement.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Osteoporotic hip augmentation; PMMA cement; Surgical planning

Year:  2019        PMID: 31371101      PMCID: PMC6736717          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  22 in total

1.  The prospects of estimating trabecular bone tissue properties from the combination of ultrasound, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, microcomputed tomography, and microfinite element analysis.

Authors:  G H van Lenthe; J P van den Bergh; A R Hermus; R Huiskes
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Mortality after admission to hospital with fractured neck of femur: database study.

Authors:  Michael J Goldacre; Stephen E Roberts; David Yeates
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-19

3.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site.

Authors:  Elise F Morgan; Harun H Bayraktar; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Effects of extreme heat and cold on human skin. II. Surface temperature, pain and heat conductivity in experiments with radiant heat.

Authors:  K BUETTNER
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1951-06       Impact factor: 3.531

5.  Elastomer femoroplasty prevents hip fracture displacement In vitro biomechanical study comparing two minimal invasive femoroplasty techniques.

Authors:  T J van der Steenhoven; W Schaasberg; A C de Vries; E R Valstar; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Femoroplasty--augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement--feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential.

Authors:  J Beckmann; S J Ferguson; M Gebauer; C Luering; B Gasser; P Heini
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Majority of hip fractures occur as a result of a fall and impact on the greater trochanter of the femur: a prospective controlled hip fracture study with 206 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J Parkkari; P Kannus; M Palvanen; A Natri; J Vainio; H Aho; I Vuori; M Järvinen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Sequential hip fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  A F Dinah
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 9.  Mortality and osteoporotic fractures: is the link causal, and is it modifiable?

Authors:  G G Teng; J R Curtis; K G Saag
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.473

10.  A biomechanical evaluation of femoroplasty under simulated fall conditions.

Authors:  Edward G Sutter; Simon C Mears; Stephen M Belkoff
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  3 in total

1.  Fiducial-Free 2D/3D Registration for Robot-Assisted Femoroplasty.

Authors:  Cong Gao; Amirhossein Farvardin; Robert B Grupp; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Liuhong Ma; Mareike Thies; Mathias Unberath; Russell H Taylor; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  A biomechanically-guided planning and execution paradigm for osteoporotic hip augmentation: Experimental evaluation of the biomechanics and temperature-rise.

Authors:  Amirhossein Farvardin; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Ryan J Murphy; Ehsan Basafa; Harpal Khanuja; Juluis K Oni; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.034

Review 3.  Finite element models for fracture prevention in patients with metastatic bone disease. A literature review.

Authors:  Amelie Sas; Esther Tanck; An Sermon; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-05-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.