Literature DB >> 23569658

The effect of cement placement on augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur.

Edward G Sutter1, Simon J Wall, Simon C Mears, Stephen M Belkoff.   

Abstract

Femoroplasty, the augmentation of the proximal femur, has been shown in biomechanical studies to increase the energy required to produce a fracture and therefore may reduce the risk of such injuries. The purpose of our study was to test the hypotheses that: (1) 15 mL of cement was sufficient to mechanically augment the proximal femur, (2) there was no difference in augmentation effect between cement placement in the intertrochanteric region and in the femoral neck, and (3) cement placement in the femoral neck would predispose the proximal femur to an intertrochanteric fracture, whereas trochanteric placement would result in subtrochanteric fractures. In each of 18 pairs of osteoporotic human cadaveric femora, 15 mL of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement was injected into the trochanteric or femoral neck region of 1 femur, and the noninjected femur was used as the control. The augmentation effect of femoroplasty was evaluated under simulated fall conditions using a materials testing machine. Multiple linear regressions incorporating random effects were used to check for associations between covariates (bone mineral density, cement location, and treatment) and the parameters of interest (stiffness, yield energy, yield load, ultimate load, and ultimate energy). Significance was set at P < .05. It was found that femoroplasty with 15 mL of cement did not significantly increase stiffness, yield energy, yield load, ultimate load, or ultimate energy relative to paired controls. There were no significant differences in parameters of interest or fracture patterns in specimens augmented in the femoral neck versus the trochanter. It was concluded that 15 mL of cement was not sufficient to augment the proximal femur and that there was no biomechanical advantage to the placement of cement within the femoral neck versus the trochanter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cement augmentation; femoroplasty; fracture prevention; hip fracture; osteoporosis

Year:  2010        PMID: 23569658      PMCID: PMC3597291          DOI: 10.1177/2151458510378406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil        ISSN: 2151-4585


  15 in total

1.  Reproducibility and side differences of mechanical tests for determining the structural strength of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Caecilia Wunderer; Holger Boehm; Volker Kuhn; Mathias Priemel; Thomas M Link; Eva-Maria Lochmüller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Long-term results and complications of cement augmentation in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  C L Cheng; S P Chow; W K Pun; J C Leong
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Thermal aspects of self-curing polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  C D Jefferiss; A J Lee; R S Ling
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1975-11

4.  Fracture and dislocation compendium. Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Heat and bone tissue. An experimental investigation of the thermal properties of bone and threshold levels for thermal injury.

Authors:  J Lundskog
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1972

6.  Femoroplasty--augmentation of the proximal femur with a composite bone cement--feasibility, biomechanical properties and osteosynthesis potential.

Authors:  J Beckmann; S J Ferguson; M Gebauer; C Luering; B Gasser; P Heini
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur.

Authors:  A C Courtney; E F Wachtel; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1994

9.  Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital-microscopic study in the rabbit.

Authors:  A R Eriksson; T Albrektsson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures.

Authors:  Peter M de Bakker; Sarah L Manske; Vincent Ebacher; Thomas R Oxland; Peter A Cripton; Pierre Guy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  15 in total

1.  Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: a combined evolutionary optimization and particle diffusion model approach.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

3.  Subject-specific planning of femoroplasty: an experimental verification study.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Ryan J Murphy; Yoshito Otake; Michael D Kutzer; Stephen M Belkoff; Simon C Mears; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  [Cement augmentation and bone graft substitutes-Materials and biomechanics].

Authors:  Boyko Gueorguiev; Mark Lenz
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-04-29

5.  Significance of preoperative planning for prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic hip: A computational modeling study.

Authors:  Amirhossein Farvardin; Ehsan Basafa; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Patient-specific finite element modeling for femoral bone augmentation.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Robert S Armiger; Michael D Kutzer; Stephen M Belkoff; Simon C Mears; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Augmentation of core decompression with synthetic bone graft does not improve mechanical properties of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Samuel A Hockett; John T Sherrill; Micah Self; Simon C Mears; C Lowry Barnes; Erin M Mannen
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-12-11

Review 8.  Unmet needs and current and future approaches for osteoporotic patients at high risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  Serge Ferrari; Jean-Yves Reginster; Maria Luisa Brandi; John A Kanis; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Jean-Marc Féron; Andreas Kurth; René Rizzoli
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  A Particle Model for Prediction of Cement Infiltration of Cancellous Bone in Osteoporotic Bone Augmentation.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Ryan J Murphy; Michael D Kutzer; Yoshito Otake; Mehran Armand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The surgical management and treatment of metastatic lesions in the proximal femur: A mini review.

Authors:  Helin Feng; Jin Wang; Jianfa Xu; Wei Chen; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.