Literature DB >> 25466685

At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada.

Yan Zheng1, Joseph D Ayotte2.   

Abstract

This special issue contains 12 papers that report on new understanding of arsenic (As) hydrogeochemistry, performance of household well water treatment systems, and testing and treatment behaviors of well users in several states of the northeastern region of the United States and Nova Scotia, Canada. The responsibility to ensure water safety of private wells falls on well owners. In the U.S., 43 million Americans, mostly from rural areas, use private wells. In order to reduce As exposure in rural populations that rely on private wells for drinking water, risk assessment, which includes estimation of population at risk of exposure to As above the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level, is helpful but insufficient because it does not identify individual households at risk. Persistent optimistic bias among well owners against testing and barriers such as cost of treatment mean that a large percentage of the population will not act to reduce their exposure to harmful substances such as As. If households are in areas with known As occurrence, a potentially large percentage of well owners will remain unaware of their exposure. To ensure that everyone, including vulnerable populations such as low income families with children and pregnant women, is not exposed to arsenic in their drinking water, alternative action will be required and warrants further research.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Behavior; Exposure reduction; Geochemistry; Hydrogeology; Private well water

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25466685      PMCID: PMC4386837          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  32 in total

Review 1.  A model of the precaution adoption process: evidence from home radon testing.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; P M Sandman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Modeling the probability of arsenic in groundwater in New England as a tool for exposure assessment.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Bernard T Nolan; John R Nuckols; Kenneth P Cantor; Gilpin R Robinson; Dalsu Baris; Laura Hayes; Margaret Karagas; William Bress; Debra T Silverman; Jay H Lubin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Effectiveness of household reverse-osmosis systems in a Western U.S. region with high arsenic in groundwater.

Authors:  Mark Walker; Ralph L Seiler; Michael Meinert
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Optimistic biases in public perceptions of the risk from radon.

Authors:  N D Weinstein; M L Klotz; P M Sandman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Treating and drinking well water in the presence of health risks from arsenic contamination: results from a U.S. hot spot.

Authors:  W Douglass Shaw; Mark Walker; Marnee Benson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Reconciling science and policy in setting federal drinking water standards--four states' perspectives.

Authors:  M S Hutcheson; C J Dupuy; B Matyas; L McGeorge; R Vanderslice
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  Predictors of home radon testing and implications for testing promotion programs.

Authors:  P M Sandman; N D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1993

8.  Applying a health behavior theory to explore the influence of information and experience on arsenic risk representations, policy beliefs, and protective behavior.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Linda C Baumann; Roger L Brown
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Arsenic in groundwater in eastern New England: occurrence, controls, and human health implications.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Denise L Montgomery; Sarah M Flanagan; Keith W Robinson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Arsenic in Nova Scotian groundwater.

Authors:  J C Meranger; K S Subramanian; R F McCurdy
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 7.963

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effectiveness of table top water pitcher filters to remove arsenic from drinking water.

Authors:  Roxanna Barnaby; Amanda Liefeld; Brian P Jackson; Thomas H Hampton; Bruce A Stanton
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Response of growth, antioxidant enzymes and root exudates production towards As stress in Pteris vittata and in Astragalus sinicus colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  Liu Yizhu; Muhammad Imtiaz; Allah Ditta; Muhammad Shahid Rizwan; Muhammad Ashraf; Sajid Mehmood; Omar Aziz; Fathia Mubeen; Muhammad Ali; Nosheen Noor Elahi; Raina Ijaz; Sha Lele; Cao Shuang; Shuxin Tu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Estimation of the proximity of private domestic wells to underground storage tanks: Oklahoma pilot study.

Authors:  James W Weaver; Andrew R Murray; Fran V Kremer
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Effect of Time Interval on Arsenic Toxicity to Paddy Field Cyanobacteria as Evident by Nitrogen Metabolism, Biochemical Constituent, and Exopolysaccharide Content.

Authors:  Anuradha Patel; Sanjesh Tiwari; Sheo Mohan Prasad
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  MDI Biological Laboratory Arsenic Summit: Approaches to Limiting Human Exposure to Arsenic.

Authors:  Bruce A Stanton; Kathleen Caldwell; Clare Bates Congdon; Jane Disney; Maria Donahue; Elizabeth Ferguson; Elsie Flemings; Meredith Golden; Mary Lou Guerinot; Jay Highman; Karen James; Carol Kim; R Clark Lantz; Robert G Marvinney; Greg Mayer; David Miller; Ana Navas-Acien; D Kirk Nordstrom; Sonia Postema; Laurie Rardin; Barry Rosen; Arup SenGupta; Joseph Shaw; Elizabeth Stanton; Paul Susca
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

6.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 7.  Environmental pollution and kidney diseases.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Sheng Nie; Hanying Ding; Fan Fan Hou
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 28.314

8.  Estimating the High-Arsenic Domestic-Well Population in the Conterminous United States.

Authors:  Joseph D Ayotte; Laura Medalie; Sharon L Qi; Lorraine C Backer; Bernard T Nolan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Biochemical and Metabolic Changes in Arsenic Contaminated Boehmeria nivea L.

Authors:  Hussani Mubarak; Nosheen Mirza; Li-Yuan Chai; Zhi-Hui Yang; Wang Yong; Chong-Jian Tang; Qaisar Mahmood; Arshid Pervez; Umar Farooq; Shah Fahad; Wajid Nasim; Kadambot H M Siddique
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Different Choices of Drinking Water Source and Different Health Risks in a Rural Population Living Near a Lead/Zinc Mine in Chenzhou City, Southern China.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Liping He; Jun Li; Fei Yang; Hongzhuan Tan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.