Literature DB >> 16573626

Applying a health behavior theory to explore the influence of information and experience on arsenic risk representations, policy beliefs, and protective behavior.

Dolores J Severtson1, Linda C Baumann, Roger L Brown.   

Abstract

The common sense model (CSM) shows how people process information to construct representations, or mental models, that guide responses to health threats. We applied the CSM to understand how people responded to information about arsenic-contaminated well water. Constructs included external information (arsenic level and information use), experience (perceived water quality and arsenic-related health effects), representations, safety judgments, opinions about policies to mitigate environmental arsenic, and protective behavior. Of 649 surveys mailed to private well users with arsenic levels exceeding the maximum contaminant level, 545 (84%) were analyzed. Structural equation modeling quantified CSM relationships. Both external information and experience had substantial effects on behavior. Participants who identified a water problem were more likely to reduce exposure to arsenic. However, about 60% perceived good water quality and 60% safe water. Participants with higher arsenic levels selected higher personal safety thresholds and 20% reported a lower arsenic level than indicated by their well test. These beliefs would support judgments of safe water. A variety of psychological and contextual factors may explain judgments of safe water when information suggested otherwise. Information use had an indirect effect on policy beliefs through understanding environmental causes of arsenic. People need concrete information about environmental risk at both personal and environmental-systems levels to promote a comprehensive understanding and response. The CSM explained responses to arsenic information and may have application to other environmental risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16573626     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00737.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  18 in total

1.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Jessie A Gleason; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Stuart Braman; Steven N Chillrud; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.840

3.  The theory-based influence of map features on risk beliefs: self-reports of what is seen and understood for maps depicting an environmental health hazard.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Christine Vatovec
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012-06-20

Review 4.  Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.

Authors:  Yan Zheng
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

5.  Private-well stewardship among a general population based sample of private well-owners.

Authors:  Kristen M C Malecki; Amy A Schultz; Dolores J Severtson; Henry A Anderson; James A VanDerslice
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  The effect of graphics on environmental health risk beliefs, emotions, behavioral intentions, and recall.

Authors:  Dolores J Severtson; Jeffrey B Henriques
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Householder status and residence type as correlates of radon awareness and testing behaviors.

Authors:  Laura S Larsson; Wade G Hill; Tamara Odom-Maryon; Paul Yu
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.462

8.  Dissemination of well water arsenic results to homeowners in Central Maine: influences on mitigation behavior and continued risks for exposure.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Robert A Johnston; Qiang Yang; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Arsenic in private well water part 2 of 3: Who benefits the most from traditional testing promotion?

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; James Ross; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Arsenic in private well water part 1 of 3: Impact of the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act on household testing and mitigation behavior.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven N Chillrud; Stuart Braman; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 7.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.