Literature DB >> 16506980

Treating and drinking well water in the presence of health risks from arsenic contamination: results from a U.S. hot spot.

W Douglass Shaw1, Mark Walker, Marnee Benson.   

Abstract

The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 regulates water quality in public drinking water supply systems but does not pertain to private domestic wells, often found in rural areas throughout the country. The recent decision to tighten the drinking water standard for arsenic from 50 parts per billion (ppb) to 10 ppb may therefore affect some households in rural communities, but may not directly reduce health risks for those on private wells. The article reports results from a survey conducted in a U.S. arsenic hot spot, the rural area of Churchill County, Nevada. This area has elevated levels of arsenic in groundwater. We find that a significant proportion of households on private wells are consuming drinking water with arsenic levels that pose a health risk. The decision to treat tap water for those on private wells in this area is modeled, and the predicted probability of treatment is used to help explain drinking water consumption. This probability represents behaviors relating to the household's perception of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16506980     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00698.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  10 in total

1.  Rural children's exposure to well water contaminants: implications in light of the American Academy of Pediatrics' recent policy statement.

Authors:  Julie Postma; Philip W Butterfield; Tamara Odom-Maryon; Wade Hill; Patricia G Butterfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2011-04-19

2.  Improve private well testing outreach efficiency by targeting households based on proximity to a high arsenic well.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Nicholas A Procopio; Steven E Spayd; Jessie A Gleason; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Health protective behavior following required arsenic testing under the New Jersey Private Well Testing Act.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Jessie A Gleason; Steven E Spayd; Nicholas A Procopio; Megan Rockafellow-Baldoni; Stuart Braman; Steven N Chillrud; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 5.840

4.  Arsenic in North Carolina: public health implications.

Authors:  Alison P Sanders; Kyle P Messier; Mina Shehee; Kenneth Rudo; Marc L Serre; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 5.  Lessons Learned from Arsenic Mitigation among Private Well Households.

Authors:  Yan Zheng
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-09

6.  At the crossroads: Hazard assessment and reduction of health risks from arsenic in private well waters of the northeastern United States and Atlantic Canada.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Joseph D Ayotte
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Dissemination of well water arsenic results to homeowners in Central Maine: influences on mitigation behavior and continued risks for exposure.

Authors:  Sara V Flanagan; Robert G Marvinney; Robert A Johnston; Qiang Yang; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Home Water Treatment Habits and Effectiveness in a Rural Arizona Community.

Authors:  Nathan Lothrop; Sarah T Wilkinson; Marc Verhougstraete; Anastasia Sugeng; Miranda M Loh; Walter Klimecki; Paloma I Beamer
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.103

9.  Factors influencing perceptions of private water quality in North America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Munene; David C Hall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-10

10.  The Case for Universal Screening of Private Well Water Quality in the U.S. and Testing Requirements to Achieve It: Evidence from Arsenic.

Authors:  Yan Zheng; Sara V Flanagan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.