Literature DB >> 25440654

Improved Performance of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System for Tracking Cardiac Output Changes.

Koichi Suehiro1, Katsuaki Tanaka2, Mika Mikawa2, Yuriko Uchihara2, Taiki Matsuyama2, Tadashi Matsuura2, Tomoharu Funao2, Tokuhiro Yamada2, Takashi Mori2, Kiyonobu Nishikawa2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare cardiac output (CO) measured by the new fourth-generation FloTrac™/Vigileo™ system (Version 4.00) (COFVS) with that measured by a pulmonary artery catheter (COREF), and to investigate the ability of COFVS to track CO changes induced by increased peripheral resistance.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Phenylephrine (100 µg) was administered.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Hemodynamic variables, including CO(REF) and CO(FVS), were measured before and after phenylephrine administration. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the discrepancy between CO(REF) and CO(FVS). Four-quadrant plot and polar-plot analyses were utilized to evaluate the trending ability of CO(FVS) against CO(REF) after phenylephrine boluses. One hundred thirty-six hemodynamic interventions were performed. The bias shown by the Bland-Altman analysis was-0.66 L/min, and the percentage error was 55.4%. The bias was significantly correlated with the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) before phenylephrine administration (p<0.001, r(2) = 0.420). The concordance rate determined by four-quadrant plot analysis and the angular concordance rate calculated using polar-plot analysis were 87.0% and 83.0%, respectively. Additionally, this trending ability was not affected by SVRI state.
CONCLUSIONS: The trending ability of the new fourth-generation FloTrac™/Vigileo™ system after increased vasomotor tone was greatly improved compared with previous versions; however, the discrepancy of the new system in CO measurement was not clinically acceptable, as in previous versions. For clinical application in critically ill patients, this vasomotor tone-dependent disagreement must be decreased.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FloTrac/Vigileo system; cardiac output; pulmonary artery catheter; systemic vascular resistance; thermodilution

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25440654     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  21 in total

1.  Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre.

Authors:  Youn Joung Cho; Chang-Hoon Koo; Tae Kyong Kim; Deok Man Hong; Yunseok Jeon
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Sanders; S Servaas; C Slagt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  The accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system™ and the Fick method in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Takuma Maeda; Eisuke Hamaguchi; Naoko Kubo; Akira Shimokawa; Hiroko Kanazawa; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Using extra systoles and the micro-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Simon T Vistisen; Jonas M Berg; Mattheus F Boekel; Marco Modestini; Remco Bergman; Jayant S Jainandunsing; Massimo A Mariani; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  Pulse waveform hemodynamic monitoring devices: recent advances and the place in goal-directed therapy in cardiac surgical patients.

Authors:  Adham Hendy; Şerban Bubenek
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2016-04

6.  Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo System™ in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Takuma Maeda; Kohshi Hattori; Miho Sumiyoshi; Hiroko Kanazawa; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 7.  Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Theodore Manolukas; Nathalie Foray; Joel Raja; Aranyak Rawal; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

8.  Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Sheng-Yi Lin; An-Hsun Chou; Yung-Fong Tsai; Su-Wei Chang; Min-Wen Yang; Pei-Chi Ting; Chun-Yu Chen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Agreement between continuous cardiac output measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system and a pulmonary artery catheter in adult liver transplantation.

Authors:  Yutaka Murata; Takumi Imai; Chikashi Takeda; Toshiyuki Mizota; Shuji Kawamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Benjamin A Kohl; Aman Mahajan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.