Literature DB >> 30414054

Using extra systoles and the micro-fluid challenge to predict fluid responsiveness during cardiac surgery.

Simon T Vistisen1,2,3, Jonas M Berg4,5, Mattheus F Boekel6, Marco Modestini6, Remco Bergman6, Jayant S Jainandunsing6, Massimo A Mariani7, Thomas W L Scheeren6.   

Abstract

Fluid responsiveness prediction is difficult during cardiac surgery. The micro-fluid challenge (micro-FC; rapid central infusion of 50 ml) and the extrasystolic method utilising post-extrasystolic preload increases may predict fluid responsiveness. Two study windows during coronary artery bypass graft surgery were defined, 1: After anaesthesia induction until surgical incision, 2: Left internal mammarian artery surgical preparation period. Each window consisted of 10-15 min observation for extrasystoles before a micro-FC was performed, after which a traditional fluid challenge (FC) was performed (5 ml/kg). Extrasystolic and micro-FC induced changes in hemodynamic variables were derived as predictors of fluid responsiveness defined as stroke volume increasing > 10% following FC. 61 patients were studied. Post-ectopic changes in pulse pressure (PP) predicted fluid responsiveness with receiver operating characteristic area (AUC) of 0.69 [CI 0.40;0.97] in the first study window and 0.64 [0.44;0.86] in the second window. Other post-ectopic predictors such as pre-ejection period (PEP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) had similar or lower AUCs. Heart rate was 52.9 (SD ±8.4) min- 1 and 53.6 (± 8.8) min- 1 in the two study windows. Micro-FC induced changes in PEP had AUC of 0.74 [0.57;0.90] in the first window and 0.60 [0.40;0.76] in the second window. Correcting micro-FC induced changes in PEP for the micro-FC induced changes in heart rate had AUCs of 0.84 [0.70;0.97] in the first window and 0.63 [0.47;0.79] in the second window. The investigated methods revealed insufficient validity during cardiac surgery. RR interval corrected changes during a micro-FC should be investigated further. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03002129.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac output; Cardiac surgery; Fluid responsiveness; Fluid therapy; Hemodynamic monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30414054     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0218-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  26 in total

1.  Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  F Michard; S Boussat; D Chemla; N Anguel; A Mercat; Y Lecarpentier; C Richard; M R Pinsky; J L Teboul
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Fabio Cavallaro; Claudio Sandroni; Cristina Marano; Giuseppe La Torre; Alice Mannocci; Chiara De Waure; Giuseppe Bello; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Frédéric Michard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Automated pre-ejection period variation indexed to tidal volume predicts fluid responsiveness after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  S T Vistisen; J J Struijk; A Larsson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.105

6.  Automated pre-ejection period variation predicts fluid responsiveness in low tidal volume ventilated pigs.

Authors:  S T Vistisen; J Koefoed-Nielsen; A Larsson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Should dynamic parameters for prediction of fluid responsiveness be indexed to the tidal volume?

Authors:  S T Vistisen; J Koefoed-Nielsen; A Larsson
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Pre-ejection period variations predict the fluid responsiveness of septic ventilated patients.

Authors:  Marc Feissel; Julio Badie; Paolo G Merlani; Jean-Pierre Faller; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi; Tajender Vasu; Amyn Hirani
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  The respiratory change in preejection period: a new method to predict fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Peter M Suter; Jacques A Romand
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  The response of a standardized fluid challenge during cardiac surgery on cerebral oxygen saturation measured with near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Frederik Holmgaard; Simon T Vistisen; Hanne B Ravn; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Stroke Volume Variation in Children Undergoing Fontan Operation.

Authors:  Yun'an Song; Huiyan Hou; Jie Bai; Hongbin Gu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Novel Methods for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Jan Horejsek; Jan Kunstyr; Pavel Michalek; Michal Porizka
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 4.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.

Authors:  Bernd Saugel; Lester A H Critchley; Thomas Kaufmann; Moritz Flick; Karim Kouz; Simon T Vistisen; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 5.  What is new in microcirculation and tissue oxygenation monitoring?

Authors:  Ilonka N de Keijzer; Dario Massari; Marko Sahinovic; Moritz Flick; Jaap Jan Vos; Thomas W L Scheeren
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 1.977

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.