Literature DB >> 23095305

Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients.

Peter Blamey1, Françoise Artieres, Deniz Başkent, François Bergeron, Andy Beynon, Elaine Burke, Norbert Dillier, Richard Dowell, Bernard Fraysse, Stéphane Gallégo, Paul J Govaerts, Kevin Green, Alexander M Huber, Andrea Kleine-Punte, Bert Maat, Mathieu Marx, Deborah Mawman, Isabelle Mosnier, Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor, Stephen O'Leary, Alexandra Rousset, Karen Schauwers, Henryk Skarzynski, Piotr H Skarzynski, Olivier Sterkers, Assia Terranti, Eric Truy, Paul Van de Heyning, Fréderic Venail, Christophe Vincent, Diane S Lazard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To update a 15-year-old study of 800 postlinguistically deaf adult patients showing how duration of severe to profound hearing loss, age at cochlear implantation (CI), age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss, etiology and CI experience affected CI outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study.
METHODS: Data from 2251 adult patients implanted since 2003 in 15 international centers were collected and speech scores in quiet were converted to percentile ranks to remove differences between centers.
RESULTS: The negative effect of long duration of severe to profound hearing loss was less important in the new data than in 1996; the effects of age at CI and age at onset of severe to profound hearing loss were delayed until older ages; etiology had a smaller effect, and the effect of CI experience was greater with a steeper learning curve. Patients with longer durations of severe to profound hearing loss were less likely to improve with CI experience than patients with shorter duration of severe to profound hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS: The factors that were relevant in 1996 were still relevant in 2011, although their relative importance had changed. Relaxed patient selection criteria, improved clinical management of hearing loss, modifications of surgical practice, and improved devices may explain the differences.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23095305     DOI: 10.1159/000343189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  155 in total

1.  Is age a limiting factor for adaptation to cochlear implant?

Authors:  Anne-Lise Hiel; Jean-Marc Gerard; Monique Decat; Naïma Deggouj
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn; Jong Ho Won; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  A longitudinal study in adults with sequential bilateral cochlear implants: time course for individual ear and bilateral performance.

Authors:  Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Laura K Holden; Michael J Strube
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Genetic variants in the peripheral auditory system significantly affect adult cochlear implant performance.

Authors:  A Eliot Shearer; Robert W Eppsteiner; Kathy Frees; Viral Tejani; Christina M Sloan-Heggen; Carolyn Brown; Paul Abbas; Camille Dunn; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Evaluation of a new slim lateral wall electrode for cochlear implantation: an imaging study in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Matti Iso-Mustajärvi; Sini Sipari; Jyrki Tervaniemi; Dzemal Gazibegovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Radiologic and functional evaluation of electrode dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Fischer; L Pinggera; V Weichbold; D Dejaco; J Schmutzhard; G Widmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

10.  Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted With a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Rosalie M Uchanski; Noël Y Dwyer; Timothy A Holden
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.