Literature DB >> 17558341

Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.

John I Lane1, Robert J Witte, Colin L W Driscoll, Jon K Shallop, Charles W Beatty, Andrew N Primak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use the improved resolution available with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in vivo to localize the cochlear implant electrode array within the basal turn. STUDY
DESIGN: Sixty-four-slice MDCT examinations of the temporal bones were retrospectively reviewed in 17 patients. Twenty-three implants were evaluated.
SETTING: Tertiary referral facility. PATIENTS: All patients with previous cochlear implantation evaluated at our center between January 2004 and March 2006 were offered a computed tomographic examination as part of the study. In addition, preoperative computed tomographic examinations in patients being evaluated for a second bilateral device were included. INTERVENTION: Sixty-four-slice MDCT examination of the temporal bones. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Localization of the electrode array within the basal turn from multiplanar reconstructions of the cochlea.
RESULTS: Twenty-three implants were imaged in 17 patients. We were able to localize the electrode array within the scala tympani within the basal turn in 10 implants. In 3 implants, the electrode array was localized to the scala vestibuli. Migration of the electrode array from scala tympani to scala vestibuli was observed in three implants. Of the 7 implants in which localization of the electrode array was indeterminate, all had disease entities that obscured the definition of the normal cochlear anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-four-slice MDCT with multiplanar reconstructions of the postoperative cochlea after cochlear implantation allows for accurate localization of the electrode array within the basal turn where normal cochlear anatomy is not obscured by the underlying disease process. Correlating the position of the electrode in the basal turn with surgical technique and implant design could be helpful in improving outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17558341     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3180686e26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  10 in total

1.  [Cochlear implants in isolated temporal bones: evaluation of electrode position with 64-slice computed tomography].

Authors:  J H Wagner; G Rademacher; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Insertion results for Contour™ and Contour Advance™ electrodes: are there individual learning curves?].

Authors:  A Aschendorff; T Klenzner; S Arndt; R Beck; C Schild; L Röddiger; W Maier; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Radiologic and functional evaluation of electrode dislocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli in patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Fischer; L Pinggera; V Weichbold; D Dejaco; J Schmutzhard; G Widmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Authors:  Mathieu Marx; Frank Risi; Bernard Escudé; Irfan Durmo; Christopher James; Frédéric Lauwers; Olivier Deguine; Bernard Fraysse
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Usami; Hideaki Moteki; Nobuyoshi Suzuki; Hisakuni Fukuoka; Maiko Miyagawa; Shin-Ya Nishio; Yutaka Takumi; Satoshi Iwasaki; Claude Jolly
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Imaging in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Antje Aschendorff
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04-26

Review 8.  Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation.

Authors:  Anandhan Dhanasingh; Claude Jolly
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-01-09

9.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

10.  Evaluation After Cochlear Implant Surgery : Correlation of Clinical Outcome and Imaging Findings using Flat-detector CT.

Authors:  Annika Stock; Victoria Bozzato; Stephan P Kloska; Alessandro Bozzato; Ulrich Hoppe; Joachim Hornung; Arnd Dörfler; Tobias Struffert
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 3.649

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.