Literature DB >> 23428935

Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Steven L Franconeri1, George A Alvarez, Patrick Cavanagh.   

Abstract

The brain has finite processing resources so that, as tasks become harder, performance degrades. Where do the limits on these resources come from? We focus on a variety of capacity-limited buffers related to attention, recognition, and memory that we claim have a two-dimensional 'map' architecture, where individual items compete for cortical real estate. This competitive format leads to capacity limits that are flexible, set by the nature of the content and their locations within an anatomically delimited space. We contrast this format with the standard 'slot' architecture and its fixed capacity. Using visual spatial attention and visual short-term memory as case studies, we suggest that competitive maps are a concrete and plausible architecture that limits cognitive capacity across many domains.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23428935      PMCID: PMC5047276          DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  88 in total

1.  A cortical mechanism for binding in visual working memory.

Authors:  A Raffone; G Wolters
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Quadrantic deficit reveals anatomical constraints on selection.

Authors:  Thomas A Carlson; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.

Authors:  Lavanya Reddy; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference.

Authors:  Jason S McCarley; Jeffrey R W Mounts
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2007-12-21

Review 6.  Topographic maps are fundamental to sensory processing.

Authors:  J H Kaas
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

8.  Direct evidence for the role of inhibition in resolving interference in memory.

Authors:  M Karl Healey; Karen L Campbell; Lynn Hasher; Lynn Ossher
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-08-31

9.  Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Diane M Beck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits.

Authors:  Alfonso Caramazza; Bradford Z. Mahon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  63 in total

1.  Explicit semantic stimulus categorization interferes with implicit emotion processing.

Authors:  Harald T Schupp; Ralf Schmälzle; Tobias Flaisch
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Chunking as a rational strategy for lossy data compression in visual working memory.

Authors:  Matthew R Nassar; Julie C Helmers; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Spatial working memory capacity predicts bias in estimates of location.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Crawford; David Landy; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Differential Contribution of Cortical Thickness, Surface Area, and Gyrification to Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence.

Authors:  Ehsan Tadayon; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Emiliano Santarnecchi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Facing a Regular World: How Spatial Object Structure Shapes Visual Processing.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Tristan Haselhuhn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Slot-like capacity and resource-like coding in a neural model of multiple-item working memory.

Authors:  Dominic Standage; Martin Paré
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The offline stream of conscious representations.

Authors:  Claire Sergent
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Frontoparietal neurostimulation modulates working memory training benefits and oscillatory synchronization.

Authors:  Kevin T Jones; Dwight J Peterson; Kara J Blacker; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Restoring Latent Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Edward F Ester; John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Exploring Cognitive Flexibility With a Noninvasive BCI Using Simultaneous Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials and Sensorimotor Rhythms.

Authors:  Bradley J Edelman; Jianjun Meng; Nicholas Gulachek; Christopher C Cline; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.