Literature DB >> 16306992

Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Edward K Vogel1, Andrew W McCollough, Maro G Machizawa.   

Abstract

The capacity of visual short-term memory is highly limited, maintaining only three to four objects simultaneously. This extreme limitation necessitates efficient mechanisms to select only the most relevant objects from the immediate environment to be represented in memory and to restrict irrelevant items from consuming capacity. Here we report a neurophysiological measure of this memory selection mechanism in humans that gauges an individual's efficiency at excluding irrelevant items from being stored in memory. By examining the moment-by-moment contents of visual memory, we observe that selection efficiency varies substantially across individuals and is strongly predicted by the particular memory capacity of each person. Specifically, high capacity individuals are much more efficient at representing only the relevant items than are low capacity individuals, who inefficiently encode and maintain information about the irrelevant items present in the display. These results provide evidence that under many circumstances low capacity individuals may actually store more information in memory than high capacity individuals. Indeed, this ancillary allocation of memory capacity to irrelevant objects may be a primary source of putative differences in overall storage capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16306992     DOI: 10.1038/nature04171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  420 in total

1.  Control of working memory content in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Andrew Hollingworth; Benjamin M Robinson; Samuel T Kaiser; Carly J Leonard; Valerie M Beck; Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Neural indices of improved attentional modulation over middle childhood.

Authors:  C Wendelken; C L Baym; A Gazzaley; S A Bunge
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  Working memory templates are maintained as feature-specific perceptual codes.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Deepak Sambhara; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Directed forgetting and directed remembering in visual working memory.

Authors:  Melonie Williams; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Causal evidence for frontal involvement in memory target maintenance by posterior brain areas during distracter interference of visual working memory.

Authors:  Eva Feredoes; Klaartje Heinen; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Christian Ruff; Jon Driver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The two-component model of memory development, and its potential implications for educational settings.

Authors:  Myriam C Sander; Markus Werkle-Bergner; Peter Gerjets; Yee Lee Shing; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Toward the neural mechanisms of reduced working memory capacity in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Carly J Leonard; Sam T Kaiser; Benjamin M Robinson; Emily S Kappenman; Britta Hahn; James M Gold; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Modeling working memory: an interference model of complex span.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky; Simon Farrell; Christopher Jarrold; Martin Greaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

9.  Severity of Topiramate-Related Working Memory Impairment Is Modulated by Plasma Concentration and Working Memory Capacity.

Authors:  Samuel P Callisto; Sílvia M Illamola; Angela K Birnbaum; Christopher M Barkley; Sai Praneeth R Bathena; Ilo E Leppik; Susan E Marino
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.126

10.  Failure to benefit from target novelty during encoding contributes to working memory deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jutta S Mayer; Jejoong Kim; Sohee Park
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.