Literature DB >> 25370642

Signal to noise ratio of energy selective x-ray photon counting systems with pileup.

Robert E Alvarez1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To derive fundamental limits on the effect of pulse pileup and quantum noise in photon counting detectors on the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and noise variance of energy selective x-ray imaging systems.
METHODS: An idealized model of the response of counting detectors to pulse pileup is used. The model assumes a nonparalyzable response and delta function pulse shape. The model is used to derive analytical formulas for the noise and energy spectrum of the recorded photons with pulse pileup. These formulas are first verified with a Monte Carlo simulation. They are then used with a method introduced in a previous paper [R. E. Alvarez, "Near optimal energy selective x-ray imaging system performance with simple detectors," Med. Phys. 37, 822-841 (2010)] to compare the signal to noise ratio with pileup to the ideal SNR with perfect energy resolution. Detectors studied include photon counting detectors with pulse height analysis (PHA), detectors that simultaneously measure the number of photons and the integrated energy (NQ detector), and conventional energy integrating and photon counting detectors. The increase in the A-vector variance with dead time is also computed and compared to the Monte Carlo results. A formula for the covariance of the NQ detector is developed. The validity of the constant covariance approximation to the Cramèr-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for larger counts is tested.
RESULTS: The SNR becomes smaller than the conventional energy integrating detector (Q) SNR for 0.52, 0.65, and 0.78 expected number photons per dead time for counting (N), two, and four bin PHA detectors, respectively. The NQ detector SNR is always larger than the N and Q SNR but only marginally so for larger dead times. Its noise variance increases by a factor of approximately 3 and 5 for the A1 and A2 components as the dead time parameter increases from 0 to 0.8 photons per dead time. With four bin PHA data, the increase in variance is approximately 2 and 4 times. The constant covariance approximation to the CRLB is valid for larger counts such as those used in medical imaging.
CONCLUSIONS: The SNR decreases rapidly as dead time increases. This decrease places stringent limits on allowable dead times with the high count rates required for medical imaging systems. The probability distribution of the idealized data with pileup is shown to be accurately described as a multivariate normal for expected counts greater than those typically utilized in medical imaging systems. The constant covariance approximation to the CRLB is also shown to be valid in this case. A new formula for the covariance of the NQ detector with pileup is derived and validated.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25370642      PMCID: PMC4243921          DOI: 10.1118/1.4898102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  15 in total

1.  On the influence of noise correlations in measurement data on basis image noise in dual-energylike x-ray imaging.

Authors:  Ewald Roessl; Andy Ziegler; Roland Proksa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography.

Authors:  J P Schlomka; E Roessl; R Dorscheid; S Dill; G Martens; T Istel; C Bäumer; C Herrmann; R Steadman; G Zeitler; A Livne; R Proksa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  An experimental study on the noise properties of x-ray CT sinogram data in Radon space.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Hongbing Lu; Zhengrong Liang; Daria Eremina; Guangxiang Zhang; Su Wang; John Chen; James Manzione
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Dimensionality and noise in energy selective x-ray imaging.

Authors:  Robert E Alvarez
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography.

Authors:  R E Alvarez; A Macovski
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Detectors for the future of X-ray imaging.

Authors:  M Aslund; E Fredenberg; M Telman; M Danielsson
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Near optimal energy selective x-ray imaging system performance with simple detectors.

Authors:  Robert E Alvarez
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV.

Authors:  J M Boone; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Modeling the performance of a photon counting x-ray detector for CT: energy response and pulse pileup effects.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Taguchi; Mengxi Zhang; Eric C Frey; Xiaolan Wang; Jan S Iwanczyk; Einar Nygard; Neal E Hartsough; Benjamin M W Tsui; William C Barber
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Photon Counting Energy Dispersive Detector Arrays for X-ray Imaging.

Authors:  Jan S Iwanczyk; Einar Nygård; Oded Meirav; Jerry Arenson; William C Barber; Neal E Hartsough; Nail Malakhov; Jan C Wessel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.679

View more
  3 in total

1.  Anomalous edge response of cadmium telluride-based photon counting detectors jointly caused by high-flux radiation and inter-pixel communication.

Authors:  Xu Ji; Kevin Treb; Ke Li
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Spectral Photon Counting CT: Imaging Algorithms and Performance Assessment.

Authors:  Adam S Wang; Norbert J Pelc
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-07

Review 3.  Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: A Review on Technical Principles and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Mario Tortora; Laura Gemini; Imma D'Iglio; Lorenzo Ugga; Gaia Spadarella; Renato Cuocolo
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-04-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.