Literature DB >> 25368870

What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Michael J Beran, Bonnie M Perdue, J David Smith.   

Abstract

Previous studies have indicated that rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) but not capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) respond to difficult or ambiguous situations by choosing not to respond or by seeking more information. Here we assessed whether a task with very low chance accuracy could diminish this species difference, presumably indicating that capuchins—compared to macaques—are less risk averse as opposed to less sensitive to signals of uncertainty. Monkeys searched for the largest of 6 stimuli on a computer screen. Trial difficulty was varied, and monkeys could choose to opt out of any trial. All rhesus monkeys, including some with no prior use of the uncertainty response, selectively avoided the most difficult trials. The majority of capuchins sometimes made uncertainty responses, but at lower rates than rhesus monkeys. Nonetheless, the presence of some adaptive uncertainty responding suggests that capuchins also experience uncertainty and can respond to it, though with less proficiency than macaque monkeys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25368870      PMCID: PMC4215522          DOI: 10.1037/xan0000020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  56 in total

1.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) immediately generalize the uncertain response.

Authors:  David A Washburn; J David Smith; Wendy E Shields
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-04

2.  Metacognition in animals: Trends and challenges.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal; Allison L Foote
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009

3.  Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?

Authors:  Annika Paukner; James R Anderson; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2005-09-24       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task.

Authors:  Frances K Balcomb; LouAnn Gerken
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-09

5.  Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Two concepts of metacognition.

Authors:  Peter Carruthers
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Joshua S Redford; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05

8.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting.

Authors:  Robert R Hampton; Aaron Zivin; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgments.

Authors:  Bennett L Schwartz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Theodore A Evans; Emilie Menzel; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.991

3.  Reversal learning in gonadectomized marmosets with and without hormone replacement: are males more sensitive to punishment?

Authors:  Matthew LaClair; Agnès Lacreuse
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  On the Flexibility of Basic Risk Attitudes in Monkeys.

Authors:  Shiva Farashahi; Habiba Azab; Benjamin Hayden; Alireza Soltani
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Exploring Potential Mechanisms Underlying the Lack of Uncertainty Monitoring in Capuchin Monkeys.

Authors:  Bonnie M Perdue; Barbara A Church; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015

7.  The transfer of category knowledge by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Barbara A Church; J David Smith
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish; Sara E Futch; Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) modulate their use of an uncertainty response depending on risk.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Barbara A Church; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.478

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.