Literature DB >> 22801861

Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Michael J Beran1, Audrey E Parrish.   

Abstract

Previous experiments have assessed planning during sequential responding to computer generated stimuli by Old World nonhuman primates including chimpanzees and rhesus macaques. However, no such assessment has been made with a New World primate species. Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) are an interesting test case for assessing the distribution of cognitive processes in the Order Primates because they sometimes show proficiency in tasks also mastered by apes and Old World monkeys, but in other cases fail to match the proficiency of those other species. In two experiments, eight capuchin monkeys selected five arbitrary stimuli in distinct locations on a computer monitor in a learned sequence. In Experiment 1, shift trials occurred in which the second and third stimuli were transposed when the first stimulus was selected by the animal. In Experiment 2, mask trials occurred in which all remaining stimuli were masked after the monkey selected the first stimulus. Monkeys made more mistakes on trials in which the locations of the second and third stimuli were interchanged than on trials in which locations were not interchanged, suggesting they had already planned to select a location that no longer contained the correct stimulus. When mask trials occurred, monkeys performed at levels significantly better than chance, but their performance exceeded chance levels only for the first and the second selections on a trial. These data indicate that capuchin monkeys performed very similarly to chimpanzees and rhesus monkeys and appeared to plan their selection sequences during the computerized task, but only to a limited degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22801861      PMCID: PMC3474881          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0532-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  40 in total

1.  Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?

Authors:  Annika Paukner; James R Anderson; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2005-09-24       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright; Jeffrey S Katz
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Sana Inoue; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Analogical reasoning in a capuchin monkey (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Erica Hoy Kennedy; Dorothy M Fragaszy
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 5.  On the evolutionary origins of executive functions.

Authors:  Alfredo Ardila
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  The formation and execution of sequential plans in pigeons (Columba livia).

Authors:  Damian Scarf; Michael Colombo
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.

Authors:  J David Smith; Michael J Beran; Joshua S Redford; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05

8.  Navigating two-dimensional mazes: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella sp.) profit from experience differently.

Authors:  Dorothy M Fragaszy; Erica Kennedy; Aeneas Murnane; Charles Menzel; Gene Brewer; Julie Johnson-Pynn; William Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Monkeys (macaca mulatta and cebus apella) and human adults and children (homo sapiens) compare subsets of moving stimuli based on numerosity.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Scott Decker; Allison Schwartz; Natasha Schultz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Exploring Potential Mechanisms Underlying the Lack of Uncertainty Monitoring in Capuchin Monkeys.

Authors:  Bonnie M Perdue; Barbara A Church; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Int J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015

4.  Prospective memory in children and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Rebecca A Williamson; Anna Gonsiorowski; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish; Sara E Futch; Theodore A Evans; Bonnie M Perdue
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Self-control assessments of capuchin monkeys with the rotating tray task and the accumulation task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Mattea S Rossettie; Brielle T James; Will Whitham; Bradlyn Walker; Sara E Futch; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) modulate their use of an uncertainty response depending on risk.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Barbara A Church; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  Endogenous cortisol correlates with performance under pressure on a working memory task in capuchin monkeys.

Authors:  Meghan J Sosnowski; Marcela E Benítez; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.