Literature DB >> 16719654

Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring.

J David Smith1, Michael J Beran, Joshua S Redford, David A Washburn.   

Abstract

Although researchers are exploring animals' capacity for monitoring their states of uncertainty, the use of some paradigms allows the criticism that animals map avoidance responses to error-causing stimuli not because of uncertainty monitored but because of feedback signals and stimulus aversion. The authors addressed this criticism with an uncertainty-monitoring task in which participants completed blocks of trials with feedback deferred so that they could not associate reinforcement signals to particular stimuli or stimulus-response pairs. Humans and 1 of 2 monkeys were able to make cognitive, decisional uncertainty responses that were independent of feedback or reinforcement history within a task. This finding unifies the comparative literature on uncertainty monitoring. The dissociation of performance from reinforcement has theoretical implications, and the deferred-feedback technique has many applications. 2006 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16719654     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  54 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Gabriel R Schroeder; Emily Kathryn Brown; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-03

3.  Metacognition and reasoning.

Authors:  Logan Fletcher; Peter Carruthers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Deferred feedback sharply dissociates implicit and explicit category learning.

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Jessica L Roeder; Barbara A Church; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-13

6.  The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Theodore A Evans; Emilie Menzel; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.991

7.  Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.

Authors:  Allison Adams; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Information-integration category learning and the human uncertainty response.

Authors:  Erick J Paul; Joseph Boomer; J David Smith; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

9.  Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Sara E Futch; J David Smith; Theodore A Evans; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

10.  Evidence of metacognitive control by humans and monkeys in a perceptual categorization task.

Authors:  Joshua S Redford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.