Literature DB >> 18801131

Three-year-old children can access their own memory to guide responses on a visual matching task.

Frances K Balcomb1, LouAnn Gerken.   

Abstract

Many models of learning rely on accessing internal knowledge states. Yet, although infants and young children are recognized to be proficient learners, the ability to act on metacognitive information is not thought to develop until early school years. In the experiments reported here, 3.5-year-olds demonstrated memory-monitoring skills by responding on a non-verbal task originally developed for non-human animals, in which they had to access their knowledge states. Children learned a set of paired associates, and were given the option to skip uncertain trials on a recognition memory test. Accuracy for accepted items was significantly higher than for skipped on a subsequent memory task that included all items. Additionally, children whose memory-monitoring assessments more closely matched actual memory performance showed superior overall learning, suggesting a correlation between memory-monitoring and memory itself. The results suggest that children may have implicit access to internal knowledge states at very young ages, providing an explanation for how they are able to guide learning, even as infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18801131     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00725.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  25 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Theodore A Evans; Emilie Menzel; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.991

4.  Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Sara E Futch; J David Smith; Theodore A Evans; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

Review 5.  Do actions speak louder than words? A comparative perspective on implicit versus explicit meta-cognition and theory of mind.

Authors:  Justin J Couchman; Michael J Beran; Mariana V C Coutinho; Joseph Boomer; Alexandria Zakrzewski; Barbara Church; J David Smith
Journal:  Br J Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-10-19

6.  Response latencies and eye gaze provide insight on how toddlers gather evidence under uncertainty.

Authors:  Sarah Leckey; Diana Selmeczy; Alireza Kazemi; Elliott G Johnson; Emily Hembacher; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-07-20

Review 7.  Animal metacognition: a tale of two comparative psychologies.

Authors:  J David Smith; Justin J Couchman; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Decision deadlines and uncertainty monitoring: the effect of time constraints on uncertainty and perceptual responses.

Authors:  Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Mariana V C Coutinho; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; J David Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

9.  Information seeking by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; J David Smith
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-04-02

10.  Executive-attentional uncertainty responses by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Mariana V C Coutinho; Barbara A Church; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.