Literature DB >> 28669115

Rats know when they remember: transfer of metacognitive responding across odor-based delayed match-to-sample tests.

Victoria L Templer1, Keith A Lee2, Aidan J Preston2.   

Abstract

Metamemory entails cognitively assessing the strength of one's memories. We tested the ability of nine Long-Evans rats to distinguish between remembering and forgetting by presenting a decline option that allowed a four-choice odor-based delayed match to sample (DMTS) tests to be by-passed. Rats performed significantly better on tests they chose to take than on tests they were forced to take, indicating metacognitive responding. However, rather than control by internal mnemonic cues, one alternative explanation is that decline use is based on external test-specific cues that become associated with increased rewards overtime. To examine this possibility, we tested rats on three generalization tests in which external contingencies were inconsistent and therefore could not serve as discriminative cues. Rats transferred adaptive use of the decline response in tests that eliminated memory by presenting no sample, increased memory by presenting multiple samples, and both weakened and strengthened memory by varying the retention interval. Further, subjects chose to take or decline the test before encountering the memory test, providing evidence that rats based their metacognitive responding on internal cues rather than external ones. To our knowledge, this is the first robust evidence for metamemory in rats using the DMTS decline-test paradigm in which several possible sources of external stimulus control can be ruled out.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Declarative memory; Executive control; Explicit memory; Metacognition; Metamemory; Monitoring

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28669115      PMCID: PMC5709207          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1109-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  54 in total

1.  Metacognition in animals: Trends and challenges.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal; Allison L Foote
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009

2.  Redundant food searches by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): a failure of metacognition?

Authors:  Annika Paukner; James R Anderson; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2005-09-24       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Do pigeons (Columba livia) study for a test?

Authors:  William A Roberts; Miranda C Feeney; Neil McMillan; Krista MacPherson; Evanya Musolino; Mark Petter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-04

Review 4.  Comparative metacognition.

Authors:  Herbert S Terrace; Lisa K Son
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Do pigeons (Columba livia) seek information when they have insufficient knowledge?

Authors:  Sumie Iwasaki; Sota Watanabe; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  The mismeasure of memory: when retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index.

Authors:  A S Benjamin; R A Bjork; B L Schwartz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-03

7.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting.

Authors:  Robert R Hampton; Aaron Zivin; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Gorillas' use of the escape response in object choice memory tests.

Authors:  Chikako Suda-King; Amanda E Bania; Erin E Stromberg; Francys Subiaul
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Metamemory in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) modulate their use of an uncertainty response depending on risk.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Barbara A Church; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.478

View more
  13 in total

1.  Dissociation of memory signals for metamemory in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Emily Kathryn Brown; Benjamin M Basile; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Simultaneous versus prospective/retrospective uncertainty monitoring: The effect of response competition across cognitive levels.

Authors:  Barbara A Church; Brooke N Jackson; Michael J Beran; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.478

3.  Slow Progress with the Most Widely Used Animal Model: Ten Years of Metacognition Research in Rats, 2009-2019.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer
Journal:  Anim Behav Cogn       Date:  2019-11

4.  Great apes and human children rationally monitor their decisions.

Authors:  Cathal O'Madagain; Katharina A Helming; Marco F H Schmidt; Eli Shupe; Josep Call; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Rats use memory confidence to guide decisions.

Authors:  Hannah R Joo; Hexin Liang; Jason E Chung; Charlotte Geaghan-Breiner; Jiang Lan Fan; Benjamin P Nachman; Adam Kepecs; Loren M Frank
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Congratulations to Animal Cognition on its 50th birthday! Some thoughts on the last 50 years of animal cognition research.

Authors:  Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 7.  Explicit memory and cognition in monkeys.

Authors:  Robert R Hampton; Jonathan W M Engelberg; Ryan J Brady
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Rhesus monkeys metacognitively monitor memories of the order of events.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Emily Kathryn Brown; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats.

Authors:  Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston; Taylor B Wise; Victoria L Templer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.

Authors:  Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.