Literature DB >> 25798793

Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).

Michael J Beran1, Audrey E Parrish1, Sara E Futch2, Theodore A Evans1, Bonnie M Perdue3.   

Abstract

Human and nonhuman primates are not mentally constrained to the present. They can remember the past and-at least to an extent-anticipate the future. Anticipation of the future ranges from long-term prospection such as planning for retirement to more short-term future-oriented cognition such as planning a route through a maze. Here we tested a great ape species (chimpanzees), an Old World monkey species (rhesus macaques), a New World monkey species (capuchin monkeys), and human children on a computerized maze task. All subjects had to move a cursor through a maze to reach a goal at the bottom of the screen. For best performance on the task, subjects had to "plan ahead" to the end of the maze to move the cursor in the correct direction, avoid traps, and reverse directions if necessary. Mazes varied in difficulty. Chimpanzees were better than both monkey species, and monkeys showed a particular deficit when moving away from the goal or changing directions was required. Children showed a similar pattern to monkeys regarding the effects of reversals and moves away from the goal, but their overall performance in terms of correct maze completion was similar to the chimpanzees. The results highlight similarities as well as differences in planning across species and the role that inhibitory control may play in future-oriented cognition in primates. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25798793      PMCID: PMC4437918          DOI: 10.1037/a0038936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  55 in total

1.  Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Sana Inoue; Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility, and inhibitory control in primates.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Filippo Aureli; Josep Call
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Sequential responding and planning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  A novel test of planning ability: great apes can plan step-by-step but not in advance of action.

Authors:  Emma C Tecwyn; Susannah K S Thorpe; Jackie Chappell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Apes save tools for future use.

Authors:  Nicholas J Mulcahy; Josep Call
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Planning in human children (Homo sapiens) assessed by maze problems on the touch screen.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Miyata; Shoji Itakura; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Navigating two-dimensional mazes: chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and capuchins (Cebus apella sp.) profit from experience differently.

Authors:  Dorothy M Fragaszy; Erica Kennedy; Aeneas Murnane; Charles Menzel; Gene Brewer; Julie Johnson-Pynn; William Hopkins
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting.

Authors:  Robert R Hampton; Aaron Zivin; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Monkeys exhibit prospective memory in a computerized task.

Authors:  Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-08-09

10.  Planning for the future by western scrub-jays.

Authors:  C R Raby; D M Alexis; A Dickinson; N S Clayton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Strategy use in probabilistic categorization by rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus [Sapajus] apella).

Authors:  Will Whitham; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Chimpanzees can point to smaller amounts of food to accumulate larger amounts but they still fail the reverse-reward contingency task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Brielle T James; Will Whitham; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 2.478

4.  Temporal emergence of age-associated changes in cognitive and physical function in vervets (Chlorocebus aethiops sabaeus).

Authors:  Brett M Frye; Payton M Valure; Suzanne Craft; Mark G Baxter; Christie Scott; Shanna Wise-Walden; David W Bissinger; Hannah M Register; Carson Copeland; Matthew J Jorgensen; Jamie N Justice; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Thomas C Register; Carol A Shively
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 7.713

5.  Of Men and Mice: Modeling the Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Regina Dahlhaus
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.639

6.  New Caledonian Crows Use Mental Representations to Solve Metatool Problems.

Authors:  Romana Gruber; Martina Schiestl; Markus Boeckle; Anna Frohnwieser; Rachael Miller; Russell D Gray; Nicola S Clayton; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The use of individual, social, and animated cue information by capuchin monkeys and children in a touchscreen task.

Authors:  Elizabeth Renner; Donna Kean; Mark Atkinson; Christine A Caldwell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Monkey plays Pac-Man with compositional strategies and hierarchical decision-making.

Authors:  Qianli Yang; Zhongqiao Lin; Wenyi Zhang; Jianshu Li; Xiyuan Chen; Jiaqi Zhang; Tianming Yang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) navigate to find hidden fruit in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Matthias Allritz; Josep Call; Ken Schweller; Emma S McEwen; Miguel de Guinea; Karline R L Janmaat; Charles R Menzel; Francine L Dolins
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 14.957

Review 10.  In what sense are dogs special? Canine cognition in comparative context.

Authors:  Stephen E G Lea; Britta Osthaus
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.