Literature DB >> 15105996

Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) discriminate between knowing and not knowing and collect information as needed before acting.

Robert R Hampton1, Aaron Zivin, Elisabeth A Murray.   

Abstract

Humans use memory awareness to determine whether relevant knowledge is available before acting, as when we determine whether we know a phone number before dialing. Such metacognition, or thinking about thinking, can improve selection of appropriate behavior. We investigated whether rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta) are capable of a simple form of metacognitive access to the contents of short-term memory. Monkeys chose among four opaque tubes, one of which concealed food. The tube containing the reward varied randomly from trial to trial. On half the trials the monkeys observed the experimenter baiting the tube, whereas on the remaining trials their view of the baiting was blocked. On each trial, monkeys were allowed a single chance to select the tube containing the reward. During the choice period the monkeys had the opportunity to look down the length of each tube, to determine if it contained food. When they knew the location of the reward, most monkeys chose without looking. In contrast, when ignorant, monkeys often made the effort required to look, thereby learning the location of the reward before choosing. Looking improved accuracy on trials on which monkeys had not observed the baiting. The difference in looking behavior between trials on which the monkeys knew, and trials on which they were ignorant, suggests that rhesus monkeys discriminate between knowing and not knowing. This result extends similar observations made of children and apes to a species of Old World monkey, suggesting that the underlying cognitive capacities may be widely distributed among primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15105996     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0215-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  51 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Gabriel R Schroeder; Emily Kathryn Brown; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-03

3.  Metacognition and reasoning.

Authors:  Logan Fletcher; Peter Carruthers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.

Authors:  Allison Adams; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Sara E Futch; J David Smith; Theodore A Evans; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

7.  Self-agency in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Justin J Couchman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Evidence of metacognitive control by humans and monkeys in a perceptual categorization task.

Authors:  Joshua S Redford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) adaptively adjust information seeking in response to information accumulated.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Alex A Pani; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  What you see is what you get? Exclusion performances in ravens and keas.

Authors:  Christian Schloegl; Anneke Dierks; Gyula K Gajdon; Ludwig Huber; Kurt Kotrschal; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.