PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of early metabolic response 4 weeks post-treatment using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing radioembolization (RE) with (90)Y-labelled microspheres. METHODS: A total of 51 consecutive patients with liver-dominant metastases of CRC were treated with RE and underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and 4 weeks after RE. In each patient, three hepatic metastases with the highest maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were selected as target lesions. Metabolic response was defined as >50 % reduction of tumour to liver ratios. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Investigated baseline characteristics included age (>60 years), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group >1), bilirubin (>1.0 mg/dl), hepatic tumour burden (>25 %) and presence of extrahepatic disease. RESULTS: The median OS after RE was 7 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 5-8]; early metabolic responders (n = 33) survived longer than non-responders (p < 0.001) with a median OS of 10 months (95 % CI 3-16) versus 4 months (95 % CI 2-6). Hepatic tumour burden also had significant impact on treatment outcome (p < 0.001) with a median OS of 5 months (95 % CI, 3-7) for patients with >25 % metastatic liver replacement vs 14 months (95 % CI 6-22) for the less advanced patients. Both factors (early metabolic response and low hepatic tumour burden) remained as independent predictors of improved survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: These are the first findings to show that molecular response assessment in CRC using (18)F-FDG PET/CT appears feasible as early as 4 weeks post-RE, allowing risk stratification and potentially facilitating early response-adapted treatment strategies.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of early metabolic response 4 weeks post-treatment using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing radioembolization (RE) with (90)Y-labelled microspheres. METHODS: A total of 51 consecutive patients with liver-dominant metastases of CRC were treated with RE and underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and 4 weeks after RE. In each patient, three hepatic metastases with the highest maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were selected as target lesions. Metabolic response was defined as >50 % reduction of tumour to liver ratios. Survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Investigated baseline characteristics included age (>60 years), performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group >1), bilirubin (>1.0 mg/dl), hepatic tumour burden (>25 %) and presence of extrahepatic disease. RESULTS: The median OS after RE was 7 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 5-8]; early metabolic responders (n = 33) survived longer than non-responders (p < 0.001) with a median OS of 10 months (95 % CI 3-16) versus 4 months (95 % CI 2-6). Hepatic tumour burden also had significant impact on treatment outcome (p < 0.001) with a median OS of 5 months (95 % CI, 3-7) for patients with >25 % metastatic liver replacement vs 14 months (95 % CI 6-22) for the less advanced patients. Both factors (early metabolic response and low hepatic tumour burden) remained as independent predictors of improved survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: These are the first findings to show that molecular response assessment in CRC using (18)F-FDG PET/CT appears feasible as early as 4 weeks post-RE, allowing risk stratification and potentially facilitating early response-adapted treatment strategies.
Authors: P Flamen; S Stroobants; E Van Cutsem; P Dupont; G Bormans; N De Vadder; F Penninckx; L Van Hoe; L Mortelmans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andrew M Scott; Dishan H Gunawardana; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Jayne E Ramshaw; Peter Lin Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: L F de Geus-Oei; H W M van Laarhoven; E P Visser; R Hermsen; B A van Hoorn; Y J L Kamm; P F M Krabbe; F H M Corstens; C J A Punt; W J G Oyen Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: K Spaepen; S Stroobants; P Dupont; P Vandenberghe; J Thomas; T de Groot; J Balzarini; C De Wolf-Peeters; L Mortelmans; G Verhoef Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Waleed Shady; Sirish Kishore; Somali Gavane; Richard K Do; Joseph R Osborne; Gary A Ulaner; Mithat Gonen; Etay Ziv; Franz E Boas; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Waleed Shady; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Richard K Do; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Mithat Gonen; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-07-06 Impact factor: 3.959