Waleed Shady1, Sirish Kishore2, Somali Gavane2, Richard K Do3, Joseph R Osborne2, Gary A Ulaner2, Mithat Gonen4, Etay Ziv1, Franz E Boas1, Constantinos T Sofocleous5. 1. Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. 2. Department of Nuclear medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. 3. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. 5. Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States. Electronic address: sofoclec@mskcc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of 4 metrics of metabolic response on FDG-PET/CT against RECIST 1.0 for determining response and predicting overall survival (OS) following (90)Y resin microspheres radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: We conducted an IRB-waived retrospective review of our radioembolization database to identify patients with unresectable CLM treated between December 2009 and December 2013. We included patients who had both PET/CT and contrast enhanced CT (CECT) available at baseline and on the first follow-up post-radioembolization. On baseline CECT up to five target tumors were chosen per patient according to RECIST 1.0. Four metrics of FDG-avidity (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) on PET/CT were measured for the same target tumors. Using RECIST 1.0, patients were classified as no progression (partial response or stable disease) and progression. For each PET metric, a cut-off point of ≥30% decrease was chosen to define response. OS was calculated from the time of radioembolization using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: The study enrolled 49 patients with 119 target tumors; a median of 2 (range: 1-5) tumors were selected per patient. Median OS was 12.7 months (95%CI: 7.2-16.7). Response by MTV (P=0.035) and TLG (P=0.044) reached statistical significance in predicting OS. Response by SUVmax (P=0.21), SUVpeak (P=0.20) or no progression by RECIST 1.0 (P=0.44) did not predict OS. CONCLUSION: Metabolic response based on changes in MTV and TLG can predict OS post-radioembolization of CLM.
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of 4 metrics of metabolic response on FDG-PET/CT against RECIST 1.0 for determining response and predicting overall survival (OS) following (90)Y resin microspheres radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: We conducted an IRB-waived retrospective review of our radioembolization database to identify patients with unresectable CLM treated between December 2009 and December 2013. We included patients who had both PET/CT and contrast enhanced CT (CECT) available at baseline and on the first follow-up post-radioembolization. On baseline CECT up to five target tumors were chosen per patient according to RECIST 1.0. Four metrics of FDG-avidity (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) on PET/CT were measured for the same target tumors. Using RECIST 1.0, patients were classified as no progression (partial response or stable disease) and progression. For each PET metric, a cut-off point of ≥30% decrease was chosen to define response. OS was calculated from the time of radioembolization using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: The study enrolled 49 patients with 119 target tumors; a median of 2 (range: 1-5) tumors were selected per patient. Median OS was 12.7 months (95%CI: 7.2-16.7). Response by MTV (P=0.035) and TLG (P=0.044) reached statistical significance in predicting OS. Response by SUVmax (P=0.21), SUVpeak (P=0.20) or no progression by RECIST 1.0 (P=0.44) did not predict OS. CONCLUSION: Metabolic response based on changes in MTV and TLG can predict OS post-radioembolization of CLM.
Authors: Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena G Violari; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Waleed Shady; Mithat Gonen; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Elena N Petre; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Richard K Do; Michael I D'Angelica; Joseph R Osborne; Neil H Segal; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Nancy E Kemeny Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2015-06-27 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Andrew S Kennedy; David Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Steven C Rose; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Samuel G Putnam; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-04
Authors: H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Guy Van Hazel; Anthony Blackwell; James Anderson; David Price; Paul Moroz; Geoff Bower; Giuseppe Cardaci; Bruce Gray Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Waleed Shady; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Joseph P Erinjeri; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; William Alago; Jeremy C Durack; Majid Maybody; Lynn A Brody; Robert H Siegelbaum; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Stephen B Solomon; Nancy E Kemeny; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ieva Kurilova; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jessica Flynn; Mithat Gönen; Gary Ulaner; Elena N Petre; F Edward Boas; Etay Ziv; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Elisabeth G Klompenhouwer; Andrea Cercek; Nancy A Kemeny; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Ahmed A Alsultan; Caren van Roekel; Maarten W Barentsz; Maarten L J Smits; Britt Kunnen; Miriam Koopman; Arthur J A T Braat; Rutger C G Bruijnen; Bart de Keizer; Marnix G E H Lam Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: I Kurilova; A Bendet; E K Fung; E N Petre; J L Humm; F E Boas; C H Crane; N Kemeny; T P Kingham; A Cercek; M I D'Angelica; R G H Beets-Tan; C T Sofocleous Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2021-02-19
Authors: Aurélien Justet; Astrid Laurent-Bellue; Gabriel Thabut; Arnaud Dieudonné; Marie-Pierre Debray; Raphael Borie; Michel Aubier; Rachida Lebtahi; Bruno Crestani Journal: Respir Res Date: 2017-04-27
Authors: Giovanni Mauri; Lorenzo Monfardini; Andrea Garnero; Maria Giulia Zampino; Franco Orsi; Paolo Della Vigna; Guido Bonomo; Gianluca Maria Varano; Marco Busso; Carlo Gazzera; Paolo Fonio; Andrea Veltri; Marco Calandri Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 6.639