Literature DB >> 27161074

Metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on FDG-PET/CT can predict overall survival after (90)Y radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases: A comparison with SUVmax, SUVpeak, and RECIST 1.0.

Waleed Shady1, Sirish Kishore2, Somali Gavane2, Richard K Do3, Joseph R Osborne2, Gary A Ulaner2, Mithat Gonen4, Etay Ziv1, Franz E Boas1, Constantinos T Sofocleous5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the performance of 4 metrics of metabolic response on FDG-PET/CT against RECIST 1.0 for determining response and predicting overall survival (OS) following (90)Y resin microspheres radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases (CLM).
METHODS: We conducted an IRB-waived retrospective review of our radioembolization database to identify patients with unresectable CLM treated between December 2009 and December 2013. We included patients who had both PET/CT and contrast enhanced CT (CECT) available at baseline and on the first follow-up post-radioembolization. On baseline CECT up to five target tumors were chosen per patient according to RECIST 1.0. Four metrics of FDG-avidity (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)) on PET/CT were measured for the same target tumors. Using RECIST 1.0, patients were classified as no progression (partial response or stable disease) and progression. For each PET metric, a cut-off point of ≥30% decrease was chosen to define response. OS was calculated from the time of radioembolization using Kaplan-Meier methodology. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis to identify predictors of OS.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 49 patients with 119 target tumors; a median of 2 (range: 1-5) tumors were selected per patient. Median OS was 12.7 months (95%CI: 7.2-16.7). Response by MTV (P=0.035) and TLG (P=0.044) reached statistical significance in predicting OS. Response by SUVmax (P=0.21), SUVpeak (P=0.20) or no progression by RECIST 1.0 (P=0.44) did not predict OS.
CONCLUSION: Metabolic response based on changes in MTV and TLG can predict OS post-radioembolization of CLM.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal liver metastases; Overall survival; PET/CT; RECIST 1.0; Radioembolization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27161074      PMCID: PMC5675072          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  36 in total

1.  Radioembolization as a Salvage Therapy for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors That Affect Outcomes.

Authors:  Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena G Violari; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Waleed Shady; Mithat Gonen; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Elena N Petre; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Richard K Do; Michael I D'Angelica; Joseph R Osborne; Neil H Segal; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Nancy E Kemeny
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Multicenter evaluation of the safety and efficacy of radioembolization in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases selected as candidates for (90)Y resin microspheres.

Authors:  Andrew S Kennedy; David Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Steven C Rose; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Samuel G Putnam; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

3.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.

Authors:  H Young; R Baum; U Cremerius; K Herholz; O Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma; J Pruim; P Price
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Assessment of response to treatment of unresectable liver tumours with 90Y microspheres: value of FDG PET versus computed tomography.

Authors:  Teresa Szyszko; Adil Al-Nahhas; Ruben Canelo; Nagy Habib; Long Jiao; Harpreet Wasan; Margarita Pagou; Paul Tait
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  Randomised phase 2 trial of SIR-Spheres plus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy versus fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy alone in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Guy Van Hazel; Anthony Blackwell; James Anderson; David Price; Paul Moroz; Geoff Bower; Giuseppe Cardaci; Bruce Gray
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Evaluating 90Y-glass microsphere treatment response of unresectable colorectal liver metastases by [18F]FDG PET: a comparison with CT or MRI.

Authors:  Ching-yee Oliver Wong; Riad Salem; Subha Raman; Vanessa L Gates; Howard J Dworkin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2002-03-29       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  The prognostic value of quantitative parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of response to internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cigdem Soydal; Ozlem N Kucuk; Ethem I Gecim; Sadik Bilgic; Atilla H Elhan
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.690

9.  Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes--A 10-year Experience at a Single Center.

Authors:  Waleed Shady; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Joseph P Erinjeri; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; William Alago; Jeremy C Durack; Majid Maybody; Lynn A Brody; Robert H Siegelbaum; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Stephen B Solomon; Nancy E Kemeny; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  The role of 18F-FDG-PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing selective internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90: a first evidence-based review.

Authors:  Salvatore Annunziata; Giorgio Treglia; Carmelo Caldarella; Federica Galiandro
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-02
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Probing carbohydrate metabolism using hyperpolarized 13 C-labeled molecules.

Authors:  Jaspal Singh; Eul Hyun Suh; Gaurav Sharma; Chalermchai Khemtong; A Dean Sherry; Zoltan Kovacs
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers for 90Y Distribution on Bremsstrahlung SPECT After Resin-Based Radioembolization.

Authors:  Isabel Schobert; Julius Chapiro; Nariman Nezami; Charlie A Hamm; Bernhard Gebauer; MingDe Lin; Jeffrey Pollak; Lawrence Saperstein; Todd Schlachter; Lynn J Savic
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: An Evolution Toward Precision Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Radioembolization of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  F Edward Boas; Lisa Bodei; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Factors Affecting Oncologic Outcomes of 90Y Radioembolization of Heavily Pre-Treated Patients With Colon Cancer Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Ieva Kurilova; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jessica Flynn; Mithat Gönen; Gary Ulaner; Elena N Petre; F Edward Boas; Etay Ziv; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Elisabeth G Klompenhouwer; Andrea Cercek; Nancy A Kemeny; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to liver transplantation for nonresectable colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Harald Grut; Svein Dueland; Pål Dag Line; Mona Elisabeth Revheim
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Dose-Response and Dose-Toxicity Relationships for Glass 90Y Radioembolization in Patients with Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ahmed A Alsultan; Caren van Roekel; Maarten W Barentsz; Maarten L J Smits; Britt Kunnen; Miriam Koopman; Arthur J A T Braat; Rutger C G Bruijnen; Bart de Keizer; Marnix G E H Lam
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Radiation segmentectomy of hepatic metastases with Y-90 glass microspheres.

Authors:  I Kurilova; A Bendet; E K Fung; E N Petre; J L Humm; F E Boas; C H Crane; N Kemeny; T P Kingham; A Cercek; M I D'Angelica; R G H Beets-Tan; C T Sofocleous
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-19

9.  [18F]FDG PET/CT predicts progression-free survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Aurélien Justet; Astrid Laurent-Bellue; Gabriel Thabut; Arnaud Dieudonné; Marie-Pierre Debray; Raphael Borie; Michel Aubier; Rachida Lebtahi; Bruno Crestani
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2017-04-27

Review 10.  Optimizing Loco Regional Management of Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: Technical Aspects and Biomarkers, Two Sides of the Same Coin.

Authors:  Giovanni Mauri; Lorenzo Monfardini; Andrea Garnero; Maria Giulia Zampino; Franco Orsi; Paolo Della Vigna; Guido Bonomo; Gianluca Maria Varano; Marco Busso; Carlo Gazzera; Paolo Fonio; Andrea Veltri; Marco Calandri
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.