Literature DB >> 29026950

The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT prior to liver transplantation for nonresectable colorectal liver metastases.

Harald Grut1,2, Svein Dueland3, Pål Dag Line4,5, Mona Elisabeth Revheim6,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of volumetric and metabolic information derivied from F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) in combination with computed tomography (CT) prior to liver transplantation (LT) in patients with nonresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). Due to scarcity of liver grafts, prognostic information enabling selection of candidates who will gain the highest survival after LT is of vital importance. 18F-FDG PET/CT was a part of the preoperative study protocol. Patients without evidence of extrahepatic malignant disease on 18F-FDG PET/CT who also fulfilled all the other inclusion criteria underwent LT.
METHODS: The preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations of all patients included in the SECA (secondary cancer) study were retrospectively assessed. Maximum, mean and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVpeak), tumor to background (T/B) ratio, metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured and calculated for all liver metastases. Total MTV and TLG were calculated for each patient. Cut-off values were determined for each of these parameters by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis dividing the patients into two groups. One, three and five-year overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) for patients over and under the cut-off value were compared by using the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients underwent LT in the SECA study. Total MTV and TLG under the cut-off values were significantly correlated to improved OS at three and five years (p = 0.027 and 0.026) and DFS (p = 0.01). One, three and five-year OS and DFS were not significantly related to SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak or T/B-ratio.
CONCLUSION: Total MTV and TLG from 18F FDG PET/CT prior to LT for nonresectable CLM were significantly correlated to improved three and five-year OS and DFS and can potentially improve the patient selection for LT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET/CT; Colorectal cancer; Liver metastases; Liver transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29026950     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3843-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  42 in total

1.  Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Kristen Wroblewski; Daniel Appelbaum; Yonglin Pu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomographic scans compared to computed tomographic scans for detecting colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seema Patel; Michael McCall; Arto Ohinmaa; David Bigam; Donna M Dryden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Emile F I Comans; Milan E J Pijl; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection.

Authors:  Robert J Downey; Timothy Akhurst; Mithat Gonen; Alain Vincent; Manjit S Bains; Steven Larson; Valerie Rusch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Ping Gu; Gang Huang; HuiPing Xue; ShuQi Wu
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  The prognostic value of quantitative parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of response to internal radiation therapy with yttrium-90 in patients with liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cigdem Soydal; Ozlem N Kucuk; Ethem I Gecim; Sadik Bilgic; Atilla H Elhan
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.690

7.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seung Hyup Hyun; Joon Young Choi; Young Mog Shim; Kwhanmien Kim; Su Jin Lee; Young Seok Cho; Ji Young Lee; Kyung-Han Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  (18)F-FDG-PET/CT predicts early tumor recurrence in living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Seung Duk Lee; Seong Hoon Kim; Young-Kyu Kim; Chulhan Kim; Seok-Ki Kim; Sung-Sik Han; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 9.  Liver transplantation for primary and metastatic liver cancers.

Authors:  Emir Hoti; Rene Adam
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 10.  Tumor quantification in clinical positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Bing Bai; James Bading; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.556

View more
  8 in total

1.  A novel score system for predicting conversion to no evidence of Disease (C-NED) in initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Authors:  Weihao Li; Jian Zhou; Tianqi Zhang; Yi Tai; Yanbo Xu; Yanfang Bai; Yu Jiang; Zhenhai Lu; Liren Li; Jinhua Huang; Zhizhong Pan; Xiaojun Wu; Jianhong Peng; Junzhong Lin
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Metabolic tumor volume predicts long-term survival after transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases: 15 years of experience from the SECA study.

Authors:  Harald Grut; Pål-Dag Line; Trygve Syversveen; Svein Dueland
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 3.  Transplantation for colorectal metastases: on the edge of a revolution.

Authors:  Axel Andres; Graziano Oldani; Thierry Berney; Philippe Compagnon; Pål-Dag Line; Christian Toso
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09-26

Review 4.  Recent advances in liver transplantation for cancer: The future of transplant oncology.

Authors:  Phillipe Abreu; Andre Gorgen; Graziano Oldani; Taizo Hibi; Gonzalo Sapisochin
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2019-07-30

5.  The Preoperative Enhanced Degree of Contrast-enhanced CT Images: A Potential Independent Predictor in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients After Radical Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Xinxin Wang; Huajun Ye; Ye Yan; Jiansheng Wu; Na Wang; Mengjun Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 6.  Advances in liver transplantation for unresectable colon cancer liver metastasis.

Authors:  Xiao Cui; Xiao-Ping Geng; Da-Chen Zhou; Ming-Hao Yang; Hui Hou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-12-27

7.  Volumetric parameters from [18 F]FDG PET/CT predicts survival in patients with high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Henning Langen Stokmo; Mahmoud Aly; Inger Marie Bowitz Lothe; Austin J Borja; Siavash Mehdizadeh Seraj; Rina Ghorpade; Xuan Miao; Geir Olav Hjortland; Eirik Malinen; Halfdan Sorbye; Thomas J Werner; Abass Alavi; Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.870

8.  Liver transplantation for unresectable colorectal liver metastases in patients and donors with extended criteria (SECA-II arm D study).

Authors:  T M Smedman; P-D Line; M Hagness; T Syversveen; H Grut; S Dueland
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-04-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.