Literature DB >> 24343171

Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.

Brenda K Edwards1, Anne-Michelle Noone, Angela B Mariotto, Edgar P Simard, Francis P Boscoe, S Jane Henley, Ahmedin Jemal, Hyunsoon Cho, Robert N Anderson, Betsy A Kohler, Christie R Eheman, Elizabeth M Ward.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society (ACS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) collaborate annually to provide updates on cancer incidence and death rates and trends in these outcomes for the United States. This year's report includes the prevalence of comorbidity at the time of first cancer diagnosis among patients with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer and survival among cancer patients based on comorbidity level.
METHODS: Data on cancer incidence were obtained from the NCI, the CDC, and the NAACCR; and data on mortality were obtained from the CDC. Long-term (1975/1992-2010) and short-term (2001-2010) trends in age-adjusted incidence and death rates for all cancers combined and for the leading cancers among men and women were examined by joinpoint analysis. Through linkage with Medicare claims, the prevalence of comorbidity among cancer patients who were diagnosed between 1992 through 2005 residing in 11 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) areas were estimated and compared with the prevalence in a 5% random sample of cancer-free Medicare beneficiaries. Among cancer patients, survival and the probabilities of dying of their cancer and of other causes by comorbidity level, age, and stage were calculated.
RESULTS: Death rates continued to decline for all cancers combined for men and women of all major racial and ethnic groups and for most major cancer sites; rates for both sexes combined decreased by 1.5% per year from 2001 through 2010. Overall incidence rates decreased in men and stabilized in women. The prevalence of comorbidity was similar among cancer-free Medicare beneficiaries (31.8%), breast cancer patients (32.2%), and prostate cancer patients (30.5%); highest among lung cancer patients (52.9%); and intermediate among colorectal cancer patients (40.7%). Among all cancer patients and especially for patients diagnosed with local and regional disease, age and comorbidity level were important influences on the probability of dying of other causes and, consequently, on overall survival. For patients diagnosed with distant disease, the probability of dying of cancer was much higher than the probability of dying of other causes, and age and comorbidity had a smaller effect on overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer death rates in the United States continue to decline. Estimates of survival that include the probability of dying of cancer and other causes stratified by comorbidity level, age, and stage can provide important information to facilitate treatment decisions.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR); North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR); Surveillance; and End Results (SEER)-Medicare; comorbidity; incidence; mortality; multiple chronic conditions; multiple health conditions; survival; trends

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24343171      PMCID: PMC3999205          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  74 in total

1.  Data sources for measuring comorbidity: a comparison of hospital records and medicare claims for cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Linda C Harlan; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  The validity of race and Hispanic origin reporting on death certificates in the United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth Arias; William S Schauman; Karl Eschbach; Paul D Sorlie; Eric Backlund
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  2008-10

3.  Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.

Authors:  Mette Kalager; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Patterns of care and survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme diagnosed during 2006.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Linda Harlan; Christopher Zeruto; Jeffrey Abrams; Bhupinder Mann
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Impact of reporting delay and reporting error on cancer incidence rates and trends.

Authors:  Limin X Clegg; Eric J Feuer; Douglas N Midthune; Michael P Fay; Benjamin F Hankey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-10-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Use of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare data to conduct case-control studies of cancer among the US elderly.

Authors:  Eric A Engels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Winnie Ricker; William Wheeler; Ruth Parsons; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  A refined comorbidity measurement algorithm for claims-based studies of breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Julie M Legler; Joan L Warren; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States.

Authors:  Peter M Ravdin; Kathleen A Cronin; Nadia Howlader; Christine D Berg; Rowan T Chlebowski; Eric J Feuer; Brenda K Edwards; Donald A Berry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Methods for improving cancer surveillance data in American Indian and Alaska Native populations.

Authors:  David K Espey; Charles L Wiggins; Melissa A Jim; Barry A Miller; Christopher J Johnson; Tom M Becker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  469 in total

1.  Patient and provider characteristics associated with colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening among Asian Americans.

Authors:  Caroline A Thompson; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Albert Chan; John K Chan; Sean R McClellan; Sukyung Chung; Cliff Olson; Vani Nimbal; Latha P Palaniappan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  A NSQIP Review of Major Morbidity and Mortality of Synchronous Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastasis Stratified by Extent of Liver Resection and Type of Colorectal Resection.

Authors:  Christopher R Shubert; Elizabeth B Habermann; John R Bergquist; Cornelius A Thiels; Kristine M Thomsen; Walter K Kremers; Michael L Kendrick; Robert R Cima; David M Nagorney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The 8q24 rs6983267G variant is associated with increased thyroid cancer risk.

Authors:  Ruta Sahasrabudhe; Ana Estrada; Paul Lott; Lynn Martin; Guadalupe Polanco Echeverry; Alejandro Velez; Gila Neta; Meiko Takahasi; Vladimir Saenko; Norisato Mitsutake; Emma Jaeguer; Carlos Simon Duque; Alejandro Rios; Mabel Bohorquez; Rodrigo Prieto; Angel Criollo; Magdalena Echeverry; Ian Tomlinson; Luis G Carvajal Carmona
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.678

4.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Jordonna Fulop; Max Liu; Rachel Blanda; Courtney Kromer; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.

Authors:  Anne Reb; Nora Ruel; Marwan Fakih; Lily Lai; Ravi Salgia; Betty Ferrell; Sagus Sampath; Jae Y Kim; Dan J Raz; Virginia Sun
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.398

6.  Focused Decision Support: a Data Mining Tool to Query the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Dataset and Guide Screening Management for the Individual Patient.

Authors:  Arjun Sharma; Jason Hostetter; James Morrison; Kenneth Wang; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Prostate Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs in Black College Men: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Krista Mincey; Brian L Turner; Khila Anderson; Sheldon Maurice; Rachel Neal; Camille White
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  Role of physical activity and diet after colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Erin L Van Blarigan; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Screening Prostate-specific Antigen Concentration and Prostate Cancer Mortality: The Korean Heart Study.

Authors:  Yejin Mok; Heejin Kimm; Sang Yop Shin; Sun Ha Jee; Elizabeth A Platz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Risk for unemployment at 10 years following cancer diagnosis among very long-term survivors: a population based study.

Authors:  Yakir Rottenberg; Angela G E M de Boer
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.