Literature DB >> 17962202

Chemotherapy response evaluation with FDG-PET in patients with colorectal cancer.

L F de Geus-Oei1, H W M van Laarhoven, E P Visser, R Hermsen, B A van Hoorn, Y J L Kamm, P F M Krabbe, F H M Corstens, C J A Punt, W J G Oyen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for early assessment of chemotherapy response in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Dynamic FDG-PET was carried out before and at 2 (n = 50) and 6 months (n = 19) after the start of treatment. Quantitative Patlak analysis [metabolic rate of glucose (MRGlu)] and a simplified method to measure glucose metabolism [standardized uptake value (SUV)] were evaluated. The predictive value of changes in glucose metabolism was assessed with Cox proportional regression analysis. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates.
RESULTS: There was an increase in the rates of death (P = 0.049 for DeltaMRGlu PET1-2; P = 0.017 for DeltaSUV PET1-2; P = 0.032 for DeltaMRGlu PET1-3; P = 0.048 for DeltaSUV PET1-3) and progression (P = 0.026 for DeltaMRGlu PET1-2; P = 0.035 for DeltaSUV PET1-2; P = 0.041 for DeltaMRGlu PET1-3; P = 0.081 for DeltaSUV PET1-3) associated with worse response as assessed by PET on Cox proportional regression analysis. The OS and PFS analysis showed a significant predictive value at broad ranges of DeltaMRGlu and DeltaSUV cut-off levels.
CONCLUSION: The degree of chemotherapy-induced changes in tumor glucose metabolism is highly predictive for patient outcome. The use of FDG-PET for therapy monitoring seems clinically feasible since simplified methods (SUV) are sufficiently reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17962202     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  40 in total

1.  Response evaluation of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer by contrast enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Ramin Schirin-Sokhan; Ron Winograd; Christoph Roderburg; Jhenee Bubenzer; Nicole Cabral do Ó; Dorothee Guggenberger; Hartmut Hecker; Christian Trautwein; Jens J W Tischendorf
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Desmoid tumour (aggressive fibromatosis) of the colon mimics malignancy on dual time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  W Makis; A Ciarallo; G Abikhzer; J Stern; J Laufer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and biomarkers for early treatment response evaluation in metastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  Bodil E Engelmann; Annika Loft; Andreas Kjær; Hans J Nielsen; Thomas A Gerds; Eric V Benzon; Nils Brünner; Ib J Christensen; Susanne H Hansson; Niels H Holländer; Michael H Kristensen; Johan Löfgren; Elena Markova; Carsten Sloth; Liselotte Højgaard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-01-22

Review 4.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.

Authors:  Andrea Gallamini; Colette Zwarthoed; Anna Borra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Evaluation of recurrent disease in the re-staging of colorectal cancer by 18F-FDG PET/CT: Use of CEA and CA 19-9 in patient selection.

Authors:  Agostino Chiaravalloti; Alessandro Fiorentini; Erika Palombo; Davide Rinino; Annamaria Lacanfora; Roberta Danieli; Carmen Di Russo; Daniele Di Biagio; Ettore Squillaci; Orazio Schillaci
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Is resection of colorectal liver metastases after a second-line chemotherapy regimen justified?

Authors:  Antoine Brouquet; Michael J Overman; Scott Kopetz; Dipen M Maru; Evelyne M Loyer; Andreas Andreou; Amanda Cooper; Steven A Curley; Christopher R Garrett; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Molecular mechanism underlying the detection of colorectal cancer by 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Kunihiko Izuishi; Yuka Yamamoto; Takanori Sano; Ryusuke Takebayashi; Yoshihiro Nishiyama; Hirohito Mori; Tsutomu Masaki; Asahiro Morishita; Yasuyuki Suzuki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  PET scans as a predictive marker of survival in advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Minsig Choi; Sri Lakshmi S Kollepara; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.481

9.  Amplitude-based optimal respiratory gating in positron emission tomography in patients with primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Willem Grootjans; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Antoi P W Meeuwis; Charlotte S van der Vos; Martin Gotthardt; Wim J G Oyen; Eric P Visser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies.

Authors:  Dennis Vriens; Eric P Visser; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.