Literature DB >> 17069585

The importance of PET in the diagnosis and response evaluation of esophageal cancer.

K Ott1, W Weber, J-R Siewert.   

Abstract

The major aims of imaging in esophageal cancer are to distinguish between locoregional and systemic disease (M-stage), to determine local tumor extension (T- and N-stage), to assess response to chemo- or chemoradiotherapy and to identify recurrence of cancer. The sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) for detection of distant metastases ranges between < 50% and > 90%. In esophageal cancer, F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been shown to detect metastatic disease in approximately 20% of patients who are considered as having only locoregional disease on CT. In locoregional pretherapeutic tumor staging, FDG-PET specificity of 80% is sufficient, but FDG-PET sensitivity of 50% is rather low. However, the initial staging of regional lymph nodes is less important because at the moment there is no pretherapeutic therapy stratification based on lymph node category. The accuracy for correct identification of recurrence in esophageal cancer is higher for FDG-PET than for CT scan. Unfortunately until today no reliable essays for prediction of response or prognosis exist for esophageal cancer in clinical practice for patients with neoadjuvant treatment. Thus the identification of parameters predicting response and/or prognosis is crucial for the future. Post-therapeutic assessment of tumor response by FDG-PET has been shown to correlate with histopathologic tumor regression and patient survival. Furthermore, quantitative measurements of tumor FDG-uptake may allow an early metabolic response evaluation after only 2 weeks of therapy. An association of metabolic response with histopathologic tumor regression and patient outcome 2 weeks after initiation of preoperative chemotherapy may be shown for esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17069585     DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00617.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  18 in total

1.  The role of integrated F-18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Soumil Vyas; Sheraz R Markar; Lydia Iordanidou; Samantha Read; David Stoker; Majid Hashemi; Ian Mitchell; Mark Winslet; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  [Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  K Ott; L Sisic; M Büchler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher; Matthias Schmidt; Ute Warnecke-Eberz
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  A suspected [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-negative metastatic lymph node successfully diagnosed by laparoscopic staging in esophageal cancer: report of two cases.

Authors:  Atsushi Takeno; Shuji Takiguchi; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Ryohei Kawabata; Yoichiro Nushijima; Tomoki Makino; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Toshiro Nishida; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Prediction of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Henrik Nienhüser; Thomas Schmidt
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Oesophageal cancer--an overview.

Authors:  Michael Schweigert; Attila Dubecz; Hubert J Stein
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Endoscopic ultrasonography in esophageal cancer leads to improved survival rates: results from a population-based study.

Authors:  Sachin Wani; Ananya Das; Amit Rastogi; Jennifer Drahos; Winifred Ricker; Ruth Parsons; Ajay Bansal; Roy Yen; Lindsay Hosford; Meghan Jankowski; Prateek Sharma; Michael B Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  18-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission computed tomography as predictive of response after chemoradiation in oesophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Elena Elimova; Xuemei Wang; Elba Etchebehere; Hironori Shiozaki; Yusuke Shimodaira; Roopma Wadhwa; Venkatram Planjery; Nikolaos Charalampakis; Mariela A Blum; Wayne Hofstetter; Jeff H Lee; Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Jane E Rogers; Dipen Maru; Heath D Skinner; Homer A Macapinlac; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Metabolic tumor width parameters as determined on PET/CT predict disease-free survival and treatment response in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Johannes B Roedl; Elkan F Halpern; Rivka R Colen; Dushyant V Sahani; Alan J Fischman; Michael A Blake
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Detection of lymph node metastases with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oesophageal cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  B B Pultrum; E J van der Jagt; H L van Westreenen; H M van Dullemen; P Kappert; H Groen; J Sietsma; M Oudkerk; J Th M Plukker; G M van Dam
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.