Literature DB >> 12029557

Evaluating 90Y-glass microsphere treatment response of unresectable colorectal liver metastases by [18F]FDG PET: a comparison with CT or MRI.

Ching-yee Oliver Wong1, Riad Salem, Subha Raman, Vanessa L Gates, Howard J Dworkin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate yttrium-90 glass microsphere treatment of unresectable liver metastases by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG PET), and to compare the effectiveness of [18F]FDG PET for this purpose with that of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and determination of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. Thirteen hepatic lobes from eight consecutive patients with colorectal cancer referred for 90Y-glass microsphere treatment of unresectable liver metastases who underwent both baseline (pretreatment) and 3-month posttreatment PET were studied. All patients also had correlative pre- and posttreatment CT or MRI for evaluation of the anatomic response and serum CEA determination for assessment of the total tumor load, as well as pretreatment hepatic intra-arterial technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin scan for lung shunting evaluation and hepatic arteriography for assessment of vascular anatomy and treatment. 90Y-glass microspheres were infused via an intra-arterial catheter under low pressure. Dedicated whole-body PET scans were analyzed visually and compared by lesion and by lobe with CT or MRI. A metabolic response after 90Y treatment to single or both hepatic lobes, assessed by PET, was present in a significantly higher proportion of the lobes than was an anatomic response, evaluated by CT or MRI (12 vs 2 lobes respectively, P<0.0002). Posttreatment PET showed no, stable, progressive, and new extrahepatic metastases in two, three, one, and two patients respectively. Following treatment, serum CEA decreased significantly, correlating with PET but not with CT or MRI. Thus, the study demonstrated a significant difference between the metabolic and the anatomic response after 90Y-glass microsphere treatment for unresectable liver metastases in colorectal cancer. PET appears to be an accurate indicator of treatment response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12029557     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-002-0787-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  38 in total

Review 1.  Intra-arterial brachytherapy of hepatic malignancies: watch the flow.

Authors:  Bruno Morgan; Andrew S Kennedy; Val Lewington; Bleddyn Jones; Ricky A Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Radioembolization for primary and metastatic liver cancer.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Ahsun Riaz; Mary F Mulcahy; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Use of computed tomography in the management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Cher Heng Tan; Revathy Iyer
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

4.  The role of early ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of progression-free survival after ⁹⁰Y radioembolization: comparison with RECIST and tumour density criteria.

Authors:  I Zerizer; A Al-Nahhas; D Towey; P Tait; B Ariff; H Wasan; G Hatice; N Habib; T Barwick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Chemoembolization and radioembolization for metastatic disease to the liver: available data and future studies.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Ahsun Riaz; Riad Salem
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2012-09

6.  Radioembolization as a Salvage Therapy for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors That Affect Outcomes.

Authors:  Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena G Violari; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Waleed Shady; Mithat Gonen; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Elena N Petre; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Richard K Do; Michael I D'Angelica; Joseph R Osborne; Neil H Segal; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Nancy E Kemeny
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.481

7.  Sequential FDG PET/CT in 90Y microsphere treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Maren Bienert; Barry McCook; Brian I Carr; David A Geller; Mike Sheetz; Nikhil Amesur; Norbert Avril
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Update of PET and PET/CT for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.

Authors:  Dominique Delbeke; William H Martin
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on FDG-PET/CT can predict overall survival after (90)Y radioembolization of colorectal liver metastases: A comparison with SUVmax, SUVpeak, and RECIST 1.0.

Authors:  Waleed Shady; Sirish Kishore; Somali Gavane; Richard K Do; Joseph R Osborne; Gary A Ulaner; Mithat Gonen; Etay Ziv; Franz E Boas; Constantinos T Sofocleous
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis.

Authors:  M A D Vente; M Wondergem; I van der Tweel; M A A J van den Bosch; B A Zonnenberg; M G E H Lam; A D van Het Schip; J F W Nijsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.