Literature DB >> 25311558

Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model.

François Blanquart1, Guillaume Achaz, Thomas Bataillon, Olivier Tenaillon.   

Abstract

The fitness landscape-the mapping between genotypes and fitness-determines properties of the process of adaptation. Several small genotypic fitness landscapes have recently been built by selecting a handful of beneficial mutations and measuring fitness of all combinations of these mutations. Here, we generate several testable predictions for the properties of these small genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model of adaptation. When the ancestral strain is far from the fitness optimum, we analytically compute the fitness effect of selected mutations and their epistatic interactions. Epistasis may be negative or positive on average depending on the distance of the ancestral genotype to the optimum and whether mutations were independently selected, or coselected in an adaptive walk. Simulations show that genotypic landscapes built from Fisher's model are very close to an additive landscape when the ancestral strain is far from the optimum. However, when it is close to the optimum, a large diversity of landscape with substantial roughness and sign epistasis emerged. Strikingly, small genotypic landscapes built from several replicate adaptive walks on the same underlying landscape were highly variable, suggesting that several realizations of small genotypic landscapes are needed to gain information about the underlying architecture of the fitness landscape.
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptation; NK model; Rough Mount Fuji; epistasis; experimental evolution; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311558      PMCID: PMC4326662          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  55 in total

1.  The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence.

Authors:  Olivier Tenaillon; Alejandra Rodríguez-Verdugo; Rebecca L Gaut; Pamela McDonald; Albert F Bennett; Anthony D Long; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reciprocal sign epistasis is a necessary condition for multi-peaked fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Frank J Poelwijk; Sorin Tănase-Nicola; Daniel J Kiviet; Sander J Tans
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  Microbial experiments on adaptive landscapes.

Authors:  Nick Colegrave; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.345

4.  Exploring the effect of sex on empirical fitness landscapes.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Selection for chaperone-like mediated genetic robustness at low mutation rate: impact of drift, epistasis and complexity.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexis Gros; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Analysis of a complete DNA-protein affinity landscape.

Authors:  William Rowe; Mark Platt; David C Wedge; Philip J Day; Douglas B Kell; Joshua Knowles
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Niche dimensionality and the genetics of ecological speciation.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Guillaume Decorzent; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The biochemical architecture of an ancient adaptive landscape.

Authors:  Mark Lunzer; Stephen P Miller; Roderick Felsheim; Antony M Dean
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The strength of genetic interactions scales weakly with mutational effects.

Authors:  Andrea Velenich; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Quantitative exploration of the catalytic landscape separating divergent plant sesquiterpene synthases.

Authors:  Paul E O'Maille; Arthur Malone; Nikki Dellas; B Andes Hess; Lidia Smentek; Iseult Sheehan; Bryan T Greenhagen; Joe Chappell; Gerard Manning; Joseph P Noel
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 15.040

View more
  28 in total

1.  Fitness variation across subtle environmental perturbations reveals local modularity and global pleiotropy of adaptation.

Authors:  Grant Kinsler; Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Patterns and Mechanisms of Diminishing Returns from Beneficial Mutations.

Authors:  Xinzhu Wei; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  The distribution of epistasis on simple fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; John J Welch
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Genotypic Complexity of Fisher's Geometric Model.

Authors:  Sungmin Hwang; Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  On the (un)predictability of a large intragenic fitness landscape.

Authors:  Claudia Bank; Sebastian Matuszewski; Ryan T Hietpas; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Extreme Antagonism Arising from Gene-Environment Interactions.

Authors:  Thomas P Wytock; Manjing Zhang; Adrian Jinich; Aretha Fiebig; Sean Crosson; Adilson E Motter
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Detecting epistasis from an ensemble of adapting populations.

Authors:  David M McCandlish; Jakub Otwinowski; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Benefit of transferred mutations is better predicted by the fitness of recipients than by their ecological or genetic relatedness.

Authors:  Yinhua Wang; Carolina Diaz Arenas; Daniel M Stoebel; Kenneth Flynn; Ethan Knapp; Marcus M Dillon; Andrea Wünsche; Philip J Hatcher; Francisco B-G Moore; Vaughn S Cooper; Tim F Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The rule of declining adaptability in microbial evolution experiments.

Authors:  Alejandro Couce; Olivier A Tenaillon
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.599

10.  The Utility of Fisher's Geometric Model in Evolutionary Genetics.

Authors:  O Tenaillon
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 13.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.