Literature DB >> 19307609

Selection for chaperone-like mediated genetic robustness at low mutation rate: impact of drift, epistasis and complexity.

Pierre-Alexis Gros1, Olivier Tenaillon.   

Abstract

Genetic robustness is defined as the constancy of a phenotype in the face of deleterious mutations. Overexpression of chaperones, to assist the folding of proteins carrying deleterious mutations, is so far one of the most accepted molecular mechanisms enhancing genetic robustness. Most theories on the evolution of robustness have focused on the implications of high mutation rate. Here we show that genetic drift, which is modulated by population size, organism complexity, and epistasis, can be a sufficient force to select for chaperone-mediated genetic robustness. Using an exact analytical solution, we also show that selection for costly genetic robustness leads to a paradox: the decrease of population fitness on long timescales and the long-term dependency on robustness mechanisms. We suggest that selection for genetic robustness could be universal and not restricted to high mutation rate organisms such as RNA viruses. The evolution of the endosymbiont Buchnera illustrates this selection mechanism and its paradox: the increased dependency on chaperones mediating genetic robustness. Our model explains why most chaperones might have become essential even in optimal growth conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19307609      PMCID: PMC2691763          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.099366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  48 in total

1.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects.

Authors:  C O Wilke; C Adami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Between genotype and phenotype: protein chaperones and evolvability.

Authors:  Suzanne L Rutherford
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  GroEL and the maintenance of bacterial endosymbiosis.

Authors:  Mario Ali Fares; Andrés Moya; Eladio Barrio
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Fisher's microscope and Haldane's ellipse.

Authors:  D Waxman; J J Welch
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Thermodynamic prediction of protein neutrality.

Authors:  Jesse D Bloom; Jonathan J Silberg; Claus O Wilke; D Allan Drummond; Christoph Adami; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  A general multivariate extension of Fisher's geometrical model and the distribution of mutation fitness effects across species.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Compensating for our load of mutations: freezing the meltdown of small populations.

Authors:  A Poon; S P Otto
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Accelerated evolution and Muller's rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria.

Authors:  N A Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Understanding the evolutionary fate of finite populations: the dynamics of mutational effects.

Authors:  Olin K Silander; Olivier Tenaillon; Lin Chao
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evolution of molecular error rates and the consequences for evolvability.

Authors:  Etienne Rajon; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations.

Authors:  Christian D Huber; Bernard Y Kim; Clare D Marsden; Kirk E Lohmueller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The evolution of epistasis and its links with genetic robustness, complexity and drift in a phenotypic model of adaptation.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexis Gros; Hervé Le Nagard; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Capturing the mutational landscape of the beta-lactamase TEM-1.

Authors:  Hervé Jacquier; André Birgy; Hervé Le Nagard; Yves Mechulam; Emmanuelle Schmitt; Jérémy Glodt; Beatrice Bercot; Emmanuelle Petit; Julie Poulain; Guilène Barnaud; Pierre-Alexis Gros; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A biophysical protein folding model accounts for most mutational fitness effects in viruses.

Authors:  C Scott Wylie; Eugene I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolutionary layering and the limits to cellular perfection.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Chaperones: needed for both the good times and the bad times.

Authors:  Roy A Quinlan; R John Ellis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Fisher's geometrical model emerges as a property of complex integrated phenotypic networks.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The Utility of Fisher's Geometric Model in Evolutionary Genetics.

Authors:  O Tenaillon
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 13.915

10.  Antigenic diversification is correlated with increased thermostability in a mammalian virus.

Authors:  John B Presloid; Tasneem F Mohammad; Adam S Lauring; Isabel S Novella
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.