Literature DB >> 27864516

On the (un)predictability of a large intragenic fitness landscape.

Claudia Bank1,2,3, Sebastian Matuszewski2,3, Ryan T Hietpas4,5, Jeffrey D Jensen6,3.   

Abstract

The study of fitness landscapes, which aims at mapping genotypes to fitness, is receiving ever-increasing attention. Novel experimental approaches combined with next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods enable accurate and extensive studies of the fitness effects of mutations, allowing us to test theoretical predictions and improve our understanding of the shape of the true underlying fitness landscape and its implications for the predictability and repeatability of evolution. Here, we present a uniquely large multiallelic fitness landscape comprising 640 engineered mutants that represent all possible combinations of 13 amino acid-changing mutations at 6 sites in the heat-shock protein Hsp90 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under elevated salinity. Despite a prevalent pattern of negative epistasis in the landscape, we find that the global fitness peak is reached via four positively epistatic mutations. Combining traditional and extending recently proposed theoretical and statistical approaches, we quantify features of the global multiallelic fitness landscape. Using subsets of the data, we demonstrate that extrapolation beyond a known part of the landscape is difficult owing to both local ruggedness and amino acid-specific epistatic hotspots and that inference is additionally confounded by the nonrandom choice of mutations for experimental fitness landscapes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; epistasis; evolution; fitness landscape; mutagenesis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27864516      PMCID: PMC5150413          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612676113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  Fitness analyses of all possible point mutations for regions of genes in yeast.

Authors:  Ryan Hietpas; Benjamin Roscoe; Li Jiang; Daniel N A Bolon
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  An experimental test for synergistic epistasis and its application in Chlamydomonas.

Authors:  J A de Visser; R F Hoekstra; H van den Ende
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Empirical fitness landscapes and the predictability of evolution.

Authors:  J Arjan G M de Visser; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  A systematic survey of an intragenic epistatic landscape.

Authors:  Claudia Bank; Ryan T Hietpas; Jeffrey D Jensen; Daniel N A Bolon
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Accelerating Mutational Load Is Not Due to Synergistic Epistasis or Mutator Alleles in Mutation Accumulation Lines of Yeast.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Jasmin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Genetic and non-genetic instability in tumor progression: link between the fitness landscape and the epigenetic landscape of cancer cells.

Authors:  Sui Huang
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  Synergistic fitness interactions and a high frequency of beneficial changes among mutations accumulated under relaxed selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  W Joseph Dickinson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Properties of selected mutations and genotypic landscapes under Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  François Blanquart; Guillaume Achaz; Thomas Bataillon; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  A bayesian MCMC approach to assess the complete distribution of fitness effects of new mutations: uncovering the potential for adaptive walks in challenging environments.

Authors:  Claudia Bank; Ryan T Hietpas; Alex Wong; Daniel N Bolon; Jeffrey D Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The fitness landscape of HIV-1 gag: advanced modeling approaches and validation of model predictions by in vitro testing.

Authors:  Jaclyn K Mann; John P Barton; Andrew L Ferguson; Saleha Omarjee; Bruce D Walker; Arup Chakraborty; Thumbi Ndung'u
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  35 in total

1.  Computational Complexity as an Ultimate Constraint on Evolution.

Authors:  Artem Kaznatcheev
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genotypic Complexity of Fisher's Geometric Model.

Authors:  Sungmin Hwang; Su-Chan Park; Joachim Krug
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evolutionary constraints in fitness landscapes.

Authors:  Luca Ferretti; Daniel Weinreich; Fumio Tajima; Guillaume Achaz
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Long-term evolution on complex fitness landscapes when mutation is weak.

Authors:  David M McCandlish
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Pervasive Pairwise Intragenic Epistasis among Sequential Mutations in TEM-1 β-Lactamase.

Authors:  Courtney E Gonzalez; Marc Ostermeier
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Additive Phenotypes Underlie Epistasis of Fitness Effects.

Authors:  Andrew M Sackman; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Recombination drives the evolution of mutational robustness.

Authors:  Sonia Singhal; Shawn M Gomez; Christina L Burch
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-01-02

8.  Probing pathways of adaptation with continuous evolution.

Authors:  Ziwei Zhong; Chang C Liu
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2019-02-13

9.  The fitness landscape of the codon space across environments.

Authors:  Inês Fragata; Sebastian Matuszewski; Mark A Schmitz; Thomas Bataillon; Jeffrey D Jensen; Claudia Bank
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Minimum epistasis interpolation for sequence-function relationships.

Authors:  Juannan Zhou; David M McCandlish
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.