Literature DB >> 27091964

Benefit of transferred mutations is better predicted by the fitness of recipients than by their ecological or genetic relatedness.

Yinhua Wang1, Carolina Diaz Arenas1, Daniel M Stoebel1, Kenneth Flynn2, Ethan Knapp3, Marcus M Dillon2, Andrea Wünsche1, Philip J Hatcher4, Francisco B-G Moore3, Vaughn S Cooper5, Tim F Cooper6.   

Abstract

The effect of a mutation depends on its interaction with the genetic background in which it is assessed. Studies in experimental systems have demonstrated that such interactions are common among beneficial mutations and often follow a pattern consistent with declining evolvability of more fit genotypes. However, these studies generally examine the consequences of interactions between a small number of focal mutations. It is not clear, therefore, that findings can be extrapolated to natural populations, where new mutations may be transferred between genetically divergent backgrounds. We build on work that examined interactions between four beneficial mutations selected in a laboratory-evolved population of Escherichia coli to test how they interact with the genomes of diverse natural isolates of the same species. We find that the fitness effect of transferred mutations depends weakly on the genetic and ecological similarity of recipient strains relative to the donor strain in which the mutations were selected. By contrast, mutation effects were strongly inversely correlated to the initial fitness of the recipient strain. That is, there was a pattern of diminishing returns whereby fit strains benefited proportionally less from an added mutation. Our results strengthen the view that the fitness of a strain can be a major determinant of its ability to adapt. They also support a role for barriers of transmission, rather than differential selection of transferred DNA, as an explanation of observed phylogenetically determined patterns of restricted recombination among E. coli strains.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beneficial mutations; epistasis; horizontal gene transfer; mutation-by-genetic background interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27091964      PMCID: PMC4983819          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524988113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  63 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Long-term dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations.

Authors:  Michael J Wiser; Noah Ribeck; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Predicting epistasis: an experimental test of metabolic control theory with bacterial transcription and translation.

Authors:  R C MacLean
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 2.411

4.  Epistasis buffers the fitness effects of rifampicin- resistance mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Alex R Hall; R Craig MacLean
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichiacoli.

Authors:  Tim F Cooper; Daniel E Rozen; Richard E Lenski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The consistency of beneficial fitness effects of mutations across diverse genetic backgrounds.

Authors:  Victoria M Pearson; Craig R Miller; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Escherichia coli lacking RpoS are rare in natural populations of non-pathogens.

Authors:  Emily Snyder; David M Gordon; Daniel M Stoebel
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Tim F Cooper
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Claire Hoede; Olivier Tenaillon; Valérie Barbe; Simon Baeriswyl; Philippe Bidet; Edouard Bingen; Stéphane Bonacorsi; Christiane Bouchier; Odile Bouvet; Alexandra Calteau; Hélène Chiapello; Olivier Clermont; Stéphane Cruveiller; Antoine Danchin; Médéric Diard; Carole Dossat; Meriem El Karoui; Eric Frapy; Louis Garry; Jean Marc Ghigo; Anne Marie Gilles; James Johnson; Chantal Le Bouguénec; Mathilde Lescat; Sophie Mangenot; Vanessa Martinez-Jéhanne; Ivan Matic; Xavier Nassif; Sophie Oztas; Marie Agnès Petit; Christophe Pichon; Zoé Rouy; Claude Saint Ruf; Dominique Schneider; Jérôme Tourret; Benoit Vacherie; David Vallenet; Claudine Médigue; Eduardo P C Rocha; Erick Denamur
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Mapping the fitness landscape of gene expression uncovers the cause of antagonism and sign epistasis between adaptive mutations.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Chou; Nigel F Delaney; Jeremy A Draghi; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  16 in total

1.  Patterns and Mechanisms of Diminishing Returns from Beneficial Mutations.

Authors:  Xinzhu Wei; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Host-selected mutations converging on a global regulator drive an adaptive leap towards symbiosis in bacteria.

Authors:  M Sabrina Pankey; Randi L Foxall; Ian M Ster; Lauren A Perry; Brian M Schuster; Rachel A Donner; Matthew Coyle; Vaughn S Cooper; Cheryl A Whistler
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Additive Phenotypes Underlie Epistasis of Fitness Effects.

Authors:  Andrew M Sackman; Darin R Rokyta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolution of resistance under alternative models of selective interference.

Authors:  Philip G Madgwick; Ricardo Kanitz
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 2.516

6.  Historical Contingency Causes Divergence in Adaptive Expression of the lac Operon.

Authors:  Kedar Karkare; Huei-Yi Lai; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Tim F Cooper
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Genetic variation in adaptability and pleiotropy in budding yeast.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Jerison; Sergey Kryazhimskiy; James Kameron Mitchell; Joshua S Bloom; Leonid Kruglyak; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Effects of Beneficial Mutations in pykF Gene Vary over Time and across Replicate Populations in a Long-Term Experiment with Bacteria.

Authors:  Fen Peng; Scott Widmann; Andrea Wünsche; Kristina Duan; Katherine A Donovan; Renwick C J Dobson; Richard E Lenski; Tim F Cooper
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Candida albicans Genetic Background Influences Mean and Heterogeneity of Drug Responses and Genome Stability during Evolution in Fluconazole.

Authors:  Aleeza C Gerstein; Judith Berman
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.389

10.  Proteostasis Environment Shapes Higher-Order Epistasis Operating on Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  Rafael F Guerrero; Samuel V Scarpino; João V Rodrigues; Daniel L Hartl; C Brandon Ogbunugafor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.