Literature DB >> 31014191

The distribution of epistasis on simple fitness landscapes.

Christelle Fraïsse1,2,3, John J Welch2.   

Abstract

Fitness interactions between mutations can influence a population's evolution in many different ways. While epistatic effects are difficult to measure precisely, important information is captured by the mean and variance of log fitnesses for individuals carrying different numbers of mutations. We derive predictions for these quantities from a class of simple fitness landscapes, based on models of optimizing selection on quantitative traits. We also explore extensions to the models, including modular pleiotropy, variable effect sizes, mutational bias and maladaptation of the wild type. We illustrate our approach by reanalysing a large dataset of mutant effects in a yeast snoRNA (small nucleolar RNA). Though characterized by some large epistatic effects, these data give a good overall fit to the non-epistatic null model, suggesting that epistasis might have limited influence on the evolutionary dynamics in this system. We also show how the amount of epistasis depends on both the underlying fitness landscape and the distribution of mutations, and so is expected to vary in consistent ways between new mutations, standing variation and fixed mutations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fisher’s geometric model; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; fitness landscapes; genetic interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31014191      PMCID: PMC6501363          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  43 in total

1.  Interaction between directional epistasis and average mutational effects.

Authors:  C O Wilke; C Adami
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Scaling of mutational effects in models for pleiotropy.

Authors:  Ned S Wingreen; Jonathan Miller; Edward C Cox
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Fisher's model and the genomics of adaptation: restricted pleiotropy, heterogenous mutation, and parallel evolution.

Authors:  Luis-Miguel Chevin; Guillaume Martin; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Evolutionary theory for modifiers of epistasis using a general symmetric model.

Authors:  Uri Liberman; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Epistasis, pleiotropy, and the mutation load in sexual and asexual populations.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Alexandre Blanckaert
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.

Authors:  B Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  How does epistasis influence the response to selection?

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Network of epistatic interactions within a yeast snoRNA.

Authors:  Olga Puchta; Botond Cseke; Hubert Czaja; David Tollervey; Guido Sanguinetti; Grzegorz Kudla
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Cost of antibiotic resistance and the geometry of adaptation.

Authors:  Ana Sousa; Sara Magalhães; Isabel Gordo
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Epistasis and the Structure of Fitness Landscapes: Are Experimental Fitness Landscapes Compatible with Fisher's Geometric Model?

Authors:  François Blanquart; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phenotypic and genotypic parallel evolution in parapatric ecotypes of Senecio.

Authors:  Maddie E James; Melanie J Wilkinson; Diana M Bernal; Huanle Liu; Henry L North; Jan Engelstädter; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  The geometry and genetics of hybridization.

Authors:  Hilde Schneemann; Bianca De Sanctis; Denis Roze; Nicolas Bierne; John J Welch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.171

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.