Literature DB >> 25255365

Regulatory changes raise troubling questions for genomic testing.

Barbara J Evans1, Michael O Dorschner2, Wylie Burke3, Gail P Jarvik4.   

Abstract

By 6 October 2014, many laboratories in the United States must begin honoring new individual data access rights created by recent changes to federal privacy and laboratory regulations. These access rights are more expansive than has been widely understood and pose complex challenges for genomic testing laboratories. This article analyzes regulatory texts and guidances to explore which laboratories are affected. It offers the first published analysis of which parts of the vast trove of data generated during next-generation sequencing will be accessible to patients and research subjects. Persons tested at affected laboratories seemingly will have access, upon request, to uninterpreted gene variant information contained in their stored variant call format, binary alignment/map, and FASTQ files. A defect in the regulations will subject some non-CLIA-regulated research laboratories to these new access requirements unless the Department of Health and Human Services takes swift action to avert this apparently unintended consequence. More broadly, all affected laboratories face a long list of daunting operational, business, compliance, and bioethical issues as they adapt to this change and to the Food and Drug Administration's recently announced plan to publish draft guidance outlining a new oversight framework for lab-developed tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25255365      PMCID: PMC4308037          DOI: 10.1038/gim.2014.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  5 in total

1.  Direct-to-patient laboratory test reporting: balancing access with effective clinical communication.

Authors:  Michael J Young; Ethan Scheinberg; Harold Bursztajn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  CLIA program and HIPAA privacy rule; patients' access to test reports. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2014-02-06

3.  Assuring the quality of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratory practice.

Authors:  Amy S Gargis; Lisa Kalman; Meredith W Berry; David P Bick; David P Dimmock; Tina Hambuch; Fei Lu; Elaine Lyon; Karl V Voelkerding; Barbara A Zehnbauer; Richa Agarwala; Sarah F Bennett; Bin Chen; Ephrem L H Chin; John G Compton; Soma Das; Daniel H Farkas; Matthew J Ferber; Birgit H Funke; Manohar R Furtado; Lilia M Ganova-Raeva; Ute Geigenmüller; Sandra J Gunselman; Madhuri R Hegde; Philip L F Johnson; Andrew Kasarskis; Shashikant Kulkarni; Thomas Lenk; C S Jonathan Liu; Megan Manion; Teri A Manolio; Elaine R Mardis; Jason D Merker; Mangalathu S Rajeevan; Martin G Reese; Heidi L Rehm; Birgitte B Simen; Joanne M Yeakley; Justin M Zook; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Heidi L Rehm; Sherri J Bale; Pinar Bayrak-Toydemir; Jonathan S Berg; Kerry K Brown; Joshua L Deignan; Michael J Friez; Birgit H Funke; Madhuri R Hegde; Elaine Lyon
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

  5 in total
  16 in total

1.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Barbarians at the Gate: Consumer-Driven Health Data Commons and the Transformation of Citizen Science.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2016-11

3.  How Much Control Do Children and Adolescents Have over Genomic Testing, Parental Access to Their Results, and Parental Communication of Those Results to Others?

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Development of the clinical next-generation sequencing industry in a shifting policy climate.

Authors:  Margaret A Curnutte; Karen L Frumovitz; Juli M Bollinger; Amy L McGuire; David J Kaufman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  "Bridge to the Literature"? Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools and the Views of Tool Developers.

Authors:  Sarah C Nelson; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  HIPAA's Individual Right of Access to Genomic Data: Reconciling Safety and Civil Rights.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Pilar N Ossorio; Susan A Berry; Henry T Greely; Amy L McGuire; Michelle A Penny; Sharon F Terry
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Katrina A B Goddard; Gail P Jarvik; Laura M Amendola; Paul S Appelbaum; Jonathan S Berg; Barbara A Bernhardt; Leslie G Biesecker; Sawona Biswas; Carrie L Blout; Kevin M Bowling; Kyle B Brothers; Wylie Burke; Charlisse F Caga-Anan; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Wendy K Chung; Ellen W Clayton; Gregory M Cooper; Kelly East; James P Evans; Stephanie M Fullerton; Levi A Garraway; Jeremy R Garrett; Stacy W Gray; Gail E Henderson; Lucia A Hindorff; Ingrid A Holm; Michelle Huckaby Lewis; Carolyn M Hutter; Pasi A Janne; Steven Joffe; David Kaufman; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Ian D Krantz; Teri A Manolio; Laurence McCullough; Jean McEwen; Amy McGuire; Donna Muzny; Richard M Myers; Deborah A Nickerson; Jeffrey Ou; Donald W Parsons; Gloria M Petersen; Sharon E Plon; Heidi L Rehm; J Scott Roberts; Dan Robinson; Joseph S Salama; Sarah Scollon; Richard R Sharp; Brian Shirts; Nancy B Spinner; Holly K Tabor; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; David L Veenstra; Nikhil Wagle; Karen Weck; Benjamin S Wilfond; Kirk Wilhelmsen; Susan M Wolf; Julia Wynn; Joon-Ho Yu
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The Limits of FDA's Authority to Regulate Clinical Research Involving High-Throughput DNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Food Drug Law J       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.619

10.  The Continuing Evolution of Ethical Standards for Genomic Sequencing in Clinical Care: Restoring Patient Choice.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.