Literature DB >> 26302600

The Limits of FDA's Authority to Regulate Clinical Research Involving High-Throughput DNA Sequencing.

Barbara J Evans.   

Abstract

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently signaled its interest in subjecting clinical investigations that employ high-throughput gene sequencing, also called next-generation sequencing, to the agency's Part 812 investigational device exemption (IDE) regulation. Genome sequencing--for reasons explained in this article--blurs the line between categories of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) research that FDA traditionally has regulated and categories of research that FDA traditionally has not regulated. This blurring creates a risk that FDA may overstep its proper authority to regulate fundamental genomic and medical research. This article surveys the legal limits of FDA's authority'to subject genomic research to its IDE requirements. Section 1 explains that FDA has authority to regulate clinical investigations of devices, but is not authorized to regulate investigations that merely use devices to expand medical knowledge or to conduct fundamental research, unless special circumstances apply. Section 2 discusses the special circumstances that can expand or limit FDA's authority to regulate a specific clinical investigation, and Section 3 demonstrates these using an example. Section 4 explores concerns that arose in recent years about risks to human subjects in a certain type of investigation known as sponsor-investigator studies. In response to these concerns, FDA has suggested that it can regulate such studies in ways that threaten to expand FDA's regulation of research at academic medical centers beyond its proper scope. These concerns, while valid in some academic research contexts, seem inapposite in the setting of genomic research programs funded by responsible.entities such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Moreover, FDA's regulations do not. appear to support the proposition that FDA can regulate sponsor-investigator studies more expansively than it regulates other studies. Section 5 explores specific ways that NIH, clinical investigators, and FDA might work together to rationalize FDA's regulation of NIH-funded-genomic research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26302600      PMCID: PMC4576719     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Drug Law J        ISSN: 1064-590X            Impact factor:   0.619


  9 in total

1.  Genetic testing and FDA regulation: overregulation threatens the emergence of genomic medicine.

Authors:  James P Evans; Michael S Watson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  FDA regulation of laboratory-developed diagnostic tests: protect the public, advance the science.

Authors:  Joshua Sharfstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A new initiative on precision medicine.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Harold Varmus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Development of the clinical next-generation sequencing industry in a shifting policy climate.

Authors:  Margaret A Curnutte; Karen L Frumovitz; Juli M Bollinger; Amy L McGuire; David J Kaufman
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Economic regulation of next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  The First Amendment Right to Speak About the Human Genome.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Univ Pa J Const Law       Date:  2014-02-01

7.  Resuscitation on television: realistic or ridiculous? A quantitative observational analysis of the portrayal of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in television medical drama.

Authors:  Dylan Harris; Hannah Willoughby
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Regulatory changes raise troubling questions for genomic testing.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans; Michael O Dorschner; Wylie Burke; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Cost of cancer diagnosis using next-generation sequencing targeted gene panels in routine practice: a nationwide French study.

Authors:  Patricia Marino; Rajae Touzani; Lionel Perrier; Etienne Rouleau; Dede Sika Kossi; Zou Zhaomin; Nathanaël Charrier; Nicolas Goardon; Claude Preudhomme; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Isabelle Borget; Sandrine Baffert
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services.

Authors:  Christi J Guerrini; Jennifer K Wagner; Sarah C Nelson; Gail H Javitt; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT AT AGE 10: GINA'S CONTROVERSIAL ASSERTION THAT DATA TRANSPARENCY PROTECTS PRIVACY AND CIVIL RIGHTS.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  William Mary Law Rev       Date:  2019

Review 4.  Assessing the Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Genomic Sequencing.

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Dmitry Dukhovny; Uwe Siebert; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2015-12-10

5.  Whole-genome sequencing as an investigational device for return of hereditary disease risk and pharmacogenomic results as part of the All of Us Research Program.

Authors:  Eric Venner; Donna Muzny; Joshua D Smith; Kimberly Walker; Cynthia L Neben; Christina M Lockwood; Phillip E Empey; Ginger A Metcalf; Chris Kachulis; Sana Mian; Anjene Musick; Heidi L Rehm; Steven Harrison; Stacey Gabriel; Richard A Gibbs; Deborah Nickerson; Alicia Y Zhou; Kimberly Doheny; Bradley Ozenberger; Scott E Topper; Niall J Lennon
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 6.  FDA oversight of NSIGHT genomic research: the need for an integrated systems approach to regulation.

Authors:  Laura V Milko; Flavia Chen; Kee Chan; Amy M Brower; Pankaj B Agrawal; Alan H Beggs; Jonathan S Berg; Steven E Brenner; Ingrid A Holm; Barbara A Koenig; Richard B Parad; Cynthia M Powell; Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  NPJ Genom Med       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 8.617

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.