Literature DB >> 29304376

HIPAA's Individual Right of Access to Genomic Data: Reconciling Safety and Civil Rights.

Barbara J Evans1.   

Abstract

In 2014, the United States granted individuals a right of access to their own laboratory test results, including genomic data. Many observers feel that this right is in tension with regulatory and bioethical standards designed to protect the safety of people who undergo genomic testing. This commentary attributes this tension to growing pains within an expanding federal regulatory program for genetic and genomic testing. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 expanded the regulatory agenda to encompass civil rights and consumer safety. The individual access right, as it applies to genomic data, is best understood as a civil-rights regulation. Competing regulatory objectives-safety and civil rights-were not successfully integrated during the initial rollout of genomic civil-rights regulations after 2008. Federal law clarifies how to prioritize safety and civil rights when the two come into conflict, although with careful policy design, the two need not collide. This commentary opens a dialog about possible solutions to advance safety and civil rights together.
Copyright © 2017 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29304376      PMCID: PMC5777935          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  12 in total

1.  Regulatory beneficiaries and informal agency policymaking.

Authors:  Nina A Mendelson
Journal:  Cornell Law Rev       Date:  2007-03

2.  Health law - genetics - Congress restricts use of genetic information by insurers and employers. - Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-233, 122 Stat. 881 (to be codified in scattered sections of 26, 29, and 42 U.S.C.).

Authors: 
Journal:  Harv Law Rev       Date:  2009-01

3.  Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, Enforcement, and Breach Notification rules under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; other modifications to the HIPAA rules.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2013-01-25

4.  CLIA program and HIPAA privacy rule; patients' access to test reports. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2014-02-06

5.  Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

Authors:  Ebony B Bookman; Aleisha A Langehorne; John H Eckfeldt; Kathleen C Glass; Gail P Jarvik; Michael Klag; Greg Koski; Arno Motulsky; Benjamin Wilfond; Teri A Manolio; Richard R Fabsitz; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.

Authors:  Richard R Fabsitz; Amy McGuire; Richard R Sharp; Mona Puggal; Laura M Beskow; Leslie G Biesecker; Ebony Bookman; Wylie Burke; Esteban Gonzalez Burchard; George Church; Ellen Wright Clayton; John H Eckfeldt; Conrad V Fernandez; Rebecca Fisher; Stephanie M Fullerton; Stacey Gabriel; Francine Gachupin; Cynthia James; Gail P Jarvik; Rick Kittles; Jennifer R Leib; Christopher O'Donnell; P Pearl O'Rourke; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Sheri D Schully; Alan R Shuldiner; Rebecca K F Sze; Joseph V Thakuria; Susan M Wolf; Gregory L Burke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2010-12

7.  Certificates of confidentiality and informed consent: perspectives of IRB chairs and institutional legal counsel.

Authors:  Devon K Check; Leslie E Wolf; Lauren A Dame; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

8.  Good laboratory practices for molecular genetic testing for heritable diseases and conditions.

Authors:  Bin Chen; MariBeth Gagnon; Shahram Shahangian; Nancy L Anderson; Devery A Howerton; Joe D Boone
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2009-06-12

9.  Regulatory changes raise troubling questions for genomic testing.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans; Michael O Dorschner; Wylie Burke; Gail P Jarvik
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Creating a data resource: what will it take to build a medical information commons?

Authors:  Patricia A Deverka; Mary A Majumder; Angela G Villanueva; Margaret Anderson; Annette C Bakker; Jessica Bardill; Eric Boerwinkle; Tania Bubela; Barbara J Evans; Nanibaa' A Garrison; Richard A Gibbs; Robert Gentleman; David Glazer; Melissa M Goldstein; Hank Greely; Crane Harris; Bartha M Knoppers; Barbara A Koenig; Isaac S Kohane; Salvatore La Rosa; John Mattison; Christopher J O'Donnell; Arti K Rai; Heidi L Rehm; Laura L Rodriguez; Robert Shelton; Tania Simoncelli; Sharon F Terry; Michael S Watson; John Wilbanks; Robert Cook-Deegan; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  10 in total

1.  Response to Dreyfus and Sobel.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Concern about Justifying the Release of Genomic Data as a Civil Right.

Authors:  Jennifer C Dreyfus; Mark E Sobel
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Pilar N Ossorio; Susan A Berry; Henry T Greely; Amy L McGuire; Michelle A Penny; Sharon F Terry
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  The Implementation Chasm Hindering Genome-informed Health Care.

Authors:  Kevin B Johnson; Ellen Wright Clayton; Justin Starren; Josh Peterson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT AT AGE 10: GINA'S CONTROVERSIAL ASSERTION THAT DATA TRANSPARENCY PROTECTS PRIVACY AND CIVIL RIGHTS.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  William Mary Law Rev       Date:  2019

Review 6.  Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations.

Authors:  Kiara V Whitley; Josie A Tueller; K Scott Weber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  A FAUSTIAN BARGAIN THAT UNDERMINES RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS' PRIVACY RIGHTS AND RETURN OF RESULTS.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Fla Law Rev       Date:  2019-09

Review 8.  APPLaUD: access for patients and participants to individual level uninterpreted genomic data.

Authors:  Adrian Thorogood; Jason Bobe; Barbara Prainsack; Anna Middleton; Erick Scott; Sarah Nelson; Manuel Corpas; Natasha Bonhomme; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Madeleine Murtagh; Erika Kleiderman
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.639

9.  Protecting Participants in Genomic Research: Understanding the "Web of Protections" Afforded by Federal and State Law.

Authors:  Leslie E Wolf; Catherine M Hammack; Erin Fuse Brown; Kathleen M Brelsford; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.604

10.  A Web Screening on Training Initiatives in Cancer Genomics for Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Ilda Hoxhaj; Flavia Beccia; Giovanna Elisa Calabrò; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.