Protein conformational heterogeneity and dynamics are known to play an important role in enzyme catalysis, but their influence has been difficult to observe directly. We have studied the effects of heterogeneity in the catalytic reaction of pig heart lactate dehydrogenase using isotope edited infrared spectroscopy, laser-induced temperature jump relaxation, and kinetic modeling. The isotope edited infrared spectrum reveals the presence of multiple reactive conformations of pyruvate bound to the enzyme, with three major reactive populations having substrate C2 carbonyl stretches at 1686, 1679, and 1674 cm(-1), respectively. The temperature jump relaxation measurements and kinetic modeling indicate that these substates form a heterogeneous branched reaction pathway, and each substate catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to lactate with a different rate. Furthermore, the rate of hydride transfer is inversely correlated with the frequency of the C2 carbonyl stretch (the rate increases as the frequency decreases), consistent with the relationship between the frequency of this mode and the polarization of the bond, which determines its reactivity toward hydride transfer. The enzyme does not appear to be optimized to use the fastest pathway preferentially but rather accesses multiple pathways in a search process that often selects slower ones. These results provide further support for a dynamic view of enzyme catalysis where the role of the enzyme is not just to bring reactants together but also to guide the conformational search for chemically competent interactions.
Protein conformational heterogeneity and dynamics are known to play an important role in enzyme catalysis, but their influence has been difficult to observe directly. We have studied the effects of heterogeneity in the catalytic reaction of pig heart lactate dehydrogenase using isotope edited infrared spectroscopy, laser-induced temperature jump relaxation, and kinetic modeling. The isotope edited infrared spectrum reveals the presence of multiple reactive conformations of pyruvate bound to the enzyme, with three major reactive populations having substrate C2 carbonyl stretches at 1686, 1679, and 1674 cm(-1), respectively. The temperature jump relaxation measurements and kinetic modeling indicate that these substates form a heterogeneous branched reaction pathway, and each substate catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to lactate with a different rate. Furthermore, the rate of hydride transfer is inversely correlated with the frequency of the C2 carbonyl stretch (the rate increases as the frequency decreases), consistent with the relationship between the frequency of this mode and the polarization of the bond, which determines its reactivity toward hydride transfer. The enzyme does not appear to be optimized to use the fastest pathway preferentially but rather accesses multiple pathways in a search process that often selects slower ones. These results provide further support for a dynamic view of enzyme catalysis where the role of the enzyme is not just to bring reactants together but also to guide the conformational search for chemically competent interactions.
While the importance
of protein conformational heterogeneity and
dynamics in enzymatic catalysis is well established, it has been difficult
to observe their influence directly.[1,2] The fluctuation
of protein structures is implicit to modern descriptions of catalytic
function ranging from preorganization of the active site to induced
fit. Conformational equilibria that occur on the nanosecond to millisecond
time scale are of particular interest because they perturb average
values of reactive structures, such as the donor–acceptor distance
for hydride transfer, and thereby modulate the catalytic rate.[3−5] Despite the importance of these concepts, the most widely used approach
to analyze enzyme kinetics in the literature and textbooks still relies
on the Michaelis–Menten model and transition state theory.
This approach has served its purpose as an organizing framework for
interpreting enzyme kinetics, but it tends to oversimplify enzyme
reaction pathways. The Michaelis–Menten model describes product
formation stemming from a single enzyme–substrate complex known
as the Michaelis state.[6,7] Transition state theory further
develops this concept by postulating a single barrier to proceeding
from the Michaelis state to the product state and thus a single transition
state that dictates enzyme selectivity and function.[8,9] Together they describe a single pathway for catalytic competency
with only a few populated structures. However, it has long been recognized
that proteins, and enzymes specifically, do not exist in unique three-dimensional
conformations. Instead, proteins are best described in a hierarchy
of interconnected conformations or substates.[10,11] The existence of such substates suggests that the progress of an
enzymatic reaction from reactive conformations is substantially more
complicated than transition state theory would have it.[12] Accurate models of enzyme catalysis must address
this landscape of viable conformations.We have studied the
role of conformational heterogeneity and dynamics
in the catalysis of hydride transfer by the enzyme lactate dehydrogenase
from pig heart (phLDH). This enzyme catalyzes the reduction of pyruvate
to lactate mediated by the transfer of a hydride from NADH to C-2
of pyruvate, as shown in Figure 1. phLDH is
a good model system for our studies for many reasons. The phLDH reaction
is rigorously ordered: NADH binds first, followed by pyruvate and
then the on-enzyme chemistry.[13] The catalytic
mechanism has been well-studied previously with various methods.[14−23] Finally, the system may be prepared such that, at equilibrium, half
occupies the pyruvate side of the reaction and half the lactate side.[24] Hence, the actual Michaelis complex may be studied
without resorting to the use of substrate mimics.
Figure 1
Schematic of the LDH
active site showing the residues stabilizing
the substrate pyruvate and the proximity of the cofactor, NADH. The catalytically key surface loop (residues 98–110) closes
over the active site, bringing residue Arg109 in hydrogen bond contact
with the ligand, forcing water to leave the pocket, and, accompanied
by the motions of mobile areas in the protein, rearranges the pocket
geometry to allow for favorable interactions between the cofactor
and the ligand that facilitate on-enzyme catalysis. Of particular
interest to this work are the hydrogen bonds formed between Arg-109
and His-195 to the C2 carbonyl of pyruvate (emphasized in red). These
bonds dictate the polarity of the carbonyl when pyruvate is bound.
Schematic of the LDH
active site showing the residues stabilizing
the substrate pyruvate and the proximity of the cofactor, NADH. The catalytically key surface loop (residues 98–110) closes
over the active site, bringing residue Arg109 in hydrogen bond contact
with the ligand, forcing water to leave the pocket, and, accompanied
by the motions of mobile areas in the protein, rearranges the pocket
geometry to allow for favorable interactions between the cofactor
and the ligand that facilitate on-enzyme catalysis. Of particular
interest to this work are the hydrogen bonds formed between Arg-109
and His-195 to the C2 carbonyl of pyruvate (emphasized in red). These
bonds dictate the polarity of the carbonyl when pyruvate is bound.We have previously reported on
the existence of a heterogeneous
population of phLDH-bound pyruvate substates while at equilibrium.[25] Our previous work observed this heterogeneity
using isotope-edited difference FTIR methods to detect multiple C-2
pyruvate carbonyl stretches characteristic of enzyme-bound substrate
that are present simultaneously at equilibrium. Heterogeneity at the
C-2 carbonyl of pyruvate is particularly relevant to questions about
catalysis in LDH because it has been previously shown that the electrostatic
interactions between this carbonyl and the protein residues His195
and Arg109 are responsible for as much as a 106 catalytic
rate enhancement of the overall 1014 enhancement from the
enzyme.[26] The equilibrium difference infrared
spectrum was resolved into four unique bands characteristic of enzyme-bound
pyruvate at 1674, 1679, 1686, and 1703 cm–1 as compared
to freepyruvate at 1710 cm–1. These four bands
are direct evidence of the multiple available conformations in the
Michaelis complex but do not report on the reactivity or catalytic
relevance of any of the observed substates. Here we present a study
of the catalytic relevance of these substates by observing the relaxation
kinetics of each substate using temperature-jump infrared (T-jump
IR) spectroscopy. We then present a scheme for the catalytic landscape
that incorporates each of these substates based on kinetic modeling
of the relaxation data.
Materials and Methods
Materials
NAD+, NADH, and pig heart LDH
(phLDH) were purchased from Roche Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN).
[15N]ammonium chloride, [U-13C]glucose, and
[2-13C]pyruvate were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories
(Tewksbury, MA). [2-13C]Lactate was enzymatically produced
by phLDH from [2-13C]pyruvate as described previously.[25]phLDH obtained from Roche was prepared
prior to use as described previously.[24,27] The production
of [U-15N, -13C]phLDH has been described previously.[25] Briefly, the phLDH gene was obtained from Zyagen’s
(San Diego, CA) pig heart cDNA library. The gene and a six-residue
His tag were subcloned into pET14b plasmids from Novagen (Merck KGaA,
Darmstadt, Germany) and transformed into C43(DE3) competent E. coli cells from OverExpress (Imaxio, Saint-Beauzire,
France). The cells were grown in minimal media supplemented with the
labeled glucose and ammonium chloride indicated above. Expression
of phLDH was induced by IPTG. The resulting uniformly labeled protein
was purified in the same manner described for unlabeled phLDH.[28] All experiments described here, except where
noted, utilized [U-15N, -13C]phLDH and the resulting
uniformly labeled enzyme will be referred to simply as LDH.
FTIR Spectroscopy
Static FTIR spectroscopy was carried
out on a Magna 760 Fourier transform spectrometer (Nicolet, Instrument
Corporation, Madison, WI) using an MCT detector as described previously.[25,29] Infrared cells consisted of CaF2 windows with 15 μm
Teflon spacers. Spectra were collected in the range 1100–4000
cm–1 with 2 cm–1 resolution. A
Blackman–Harris three-term apodization and a Happ–Genzel
apodization were applied, respectively. Omnic 4.1a (Nicolet Instruments,
Corp.) software was used for data collection and analysis. All samples
were prepared in D2O buffer with 100 mM phosphate at pH
7.2 (pH meter reading). The LDH reaction mixture was prepared at the
initial concentrations of 4:4:20 mM (LDH•NAD+•lactate,
where LDH concentration refers to active sites). Under such conditions,
about half of the NAD+ was converted to NADH, yielding
an on-enzyme pyruvate concentration of about 2 mM as determined by
UV–vis measurements.[27] This high
protein concentration is required to observe the weak absorbance of
a single substrate carbonyl bond in the large enzyme complex, as each
protein active site only binds one substrate. We did not observe protein
aggregation at this concentration on the basis of the complete absence
of the intense IR marker bands for aggregation. Additionally, we performed
temperature-dependent FTIR measurements on this same reaction mixture.
The sample cell was in thermal contact with the stage. The temperature
of the stage was controlled by a water bath. Collection of spectra
and temperature control were automated by Labview (National Instruments,
Austin, TX) routines written in our lab.
Temperature-Jump IR Spectroscopy
T-jump IR spectroscopy
was performed with a previously described setup.[30,31] Briefly, a 1.91 μm pump beam is produced by the first Stokes
shift of the fundamental line from a Nd:YAG laser (30 mJ/pulse, 10
Hz repetition rate, 10 ns pulse width, Spectra Physics (Mountain View,
CA)) pumping a H2-filled Raman shifter. The 1.91 μm
pump beam is absorbed weakly by the combination bands of the D2O solution, allowing for near uniform heating of the solution.
The heated region is probed by a quantum cascade laser (Daylight Solutions
Inc., Poway, CA) tunable from 1565 to 1723 cm–1.
Changes in probe beam transmission are detected by a fast (200 MHz)
photovoltaic MCT detector (Kolmar Technologies, Newburyport, MA),
and the signal is filtered and amplified in a low noise preamplifier
(SR560, Stanford Research Systems). Typically, 10000 pump–probe
events are averaged for each probe frequency of interest. The sample
cell path length was 200 μm. Temperature jumps of 8 and 15 °C
were employed in this study. A consistent final temperature of 30
°C was used so that all results were reporting on the same thermal
equilibrium. The useful time range of the instrument used in this
study is from 10 μs to 1 ms. The lower limit of this range is
set by the bandwidth of the preamplifier. The geometry of our cell
arrangement is such that heat diffuses out of the irradiated volume
with a lifetime of a few ms; this determines the duration of the T-jump
and thus sets an upper limit to the useful time range.The relaxation
spectra of the enzyme complexes with infrared probes at pyruvate frequencies
contain signals not only from pyruvate but also from the protein,
because it has a broad background absorbance in this region. Two types
of difference methods were used to remove the contributions from the
protein kinetics in these data. The first was to use the isotope edited
methods similar to that for the static infrared studies, as described
in detail in refs (25, 29, and 32). In this approach, the pyruvate-specific
infrared probes were used on both enzyme complexes with cofactor/pyruvate
and with cofactor/[2-13C]pyruvate. The contribution from
protein in the relaxation transient can be eliminated by subtraction
of the IR transient of the enzyme complex with [2-13C]pyruvate
from the unlabeled complex. The second method is to use an infrared
probe that is off resonance from the pyruvate frequencies so that
only the background protein relaxation transient is obtained. In our
case, 1695 cm–1 is used as a reference probe frequency,
since the static data indicate that the pyruvate C2=O stretch
mode is absent at this frequency. Subtraction of the protein kinetics
from the data with infrared probes specific for pyruvate substates
yields the relaxation kinetics of only those substates. We have found
the kinetic results obtained by these two methods are very similar,
especially in the frequency region of the heterogeneous broadened
1680 cm–1 band.
Kinetic Modeling
Modeling a proposed reaction scheme
to fit the measured temperature-jump kinetics was performed with MATLAB
2013b (MathWorks, Natlick, MA) using routines written in our lab.
A standard curve fitting approach is not applicable to this problem
because there is not enough information known about the rate constants
at each step and such an approach would be underdetermined. Instead,
our overall approach was to test how well the predicted relaxation
kinetics from an input reaction scheme match the experimental relaxation
(temperature-jump) results. A detailed explanation is presented in
the Supporting Information. This approach
necessitates a large number of variables to fully describe the system.
The routine involves four main steps and requires an input reaction
scheme, a set of rate constants, and activation energies that define
the scheme at a given temperature, initial and final jump temperatures,
and initial concentrations of each component in the reaction scheme.
Step one generates rate constants for the scheme at the experimentally
relevant temperatures. Step two determines equilibrium concentrations
of all states at each temperature using a master equation approach.
Step three calculates relaxation times and amplitudes by an eigenvalue
decomposition approach. Step four calculates a time-dependent profile
of each state based on the parameters calculated in the previous steps.
To quantitatively compare similarity between a predicted set of results
and the experimental data, we devised a scoring method that considers
all of the transient data at five different probe frequencies. First,
we calculated an accuracy score for each transient, as shown in eq 1where j is each probe frequency, n is the total number
of points in the transient, and i is a given point
in time. This method gives a direct measure
of how accurately the predicted transient matches the experiment and
ignores whether the predicted data over- or underestimates the experimental
data. A perfect score is zero. Finally, a composite score for an entire
fitting run is compiled as the summation of all the transient scores,
as shown in eq 2.The total
score is used for comparison
as the whole process is cycled in a Monte Carlo fashion where a rate
constant is randomly modified, the steps are repeated, and the score
is computed to determine if the fit is improved. To test multiple
trajectories with many Monte Carlo steps in a reasonable amount of
time, the calculations were performed on a multiprocessor cluster
in the Emerson Center for Scientific Computation.
Results and Discussion
Equilibrium
FTIR Studies
Figure 2 displays the
infrared isotope edited difference spectra of LDH-bound
pyruvate at 5, 15, 25, and 35 °C. The difference spectra were
generated by subtracting the protein-bound [2-13C]pyruvate
spectra from the protein-bound [2-12C]pyruvate spectra
at each temperature. The resulting difference spectra report only
on the infrared bands that are affected by the label; therefore, these
IR difference features report directly on the reactive carbonyl bond
involved in the catalytic turnover. The [2-12C]pyruvate
carbonyl stretches are the positive bands in the spectrum, whereas
the [2-13C]pyruvate carbonyl stretches would appear as
negative bands at lower energy; the negative bands are visible in
Figure S1 (Supporting Information). The
carbonyl infrared stretch overlaps with strong H2O absorption
bands and the amide I bands of the protein backbone. To minimize this
spectral overlap, we worked with D2O solutions of uniformly
isotope-labeled [U-15N, -13C]LDH. The larger
molecular mass shifts the protein amide-I infrared absorbance to lower
energy, away from the pyruvate 12C2=O stretch frequency.
Figure 2
Isotope-labeled
difference FTIR spectra of [U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-12C]pyruvate minus
[U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-13C]pyruvate at the indicated temperatures.
Isotope-labeled
difference FTIR spectra of [U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-12C]pyruvate minus
[U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-13C]pyruvate at the indicated temperatures.The 12C2=O stretch IR spectrum
of bound pyruvate
is heterogeneously broadened. Gaussian fits to the spectrum reveal
several sub-bands that we assign to different enzyme-bound pyruvate
conformational substates.[25] A reasonable
fit of the data was produced by the sum of four Gaussian sub-bands
with center frequencies at 1674, 1679, 1686, and 1703 cm–1, although we cannot rule out the possibility that each of these
bands could be composed of more than one overlapping substate. These
Gaussian sub-bands are shown in Figure S1 (Supporting
Information). There is also the likelihood of sparsely populated
substates that are not apparent in the IR difference spectra due to
limited sensitivity.[33] Two observations
illustrate that the substate distribution is temperature-dependent.
First, all band intensities tend to decrease as the temperature is
raised. This indicates the population shifts away from bound pyruvate
either to freepyruvate or to the product side (bound or freelactate)
at higher temperature. The IR difference spectra do not allow us to
track the lactate population directly, because upon conversion to
lactate the C2 carbonyl infrared stretch is lost and the corresponding
lactate vibration is not observed in this spectral region (it is at
lower frequency and obscured by protein absorbance). The second observation
is that a new equilibrium is established among the substates when
comparing the lowest temperature spectrum to higher ones. This trend
is visible by comparing the more dramatic decrease in absorption at
1679 cm–1 to the minimal decrease in absorption
at 1674 and 1686 cm–1. Therefore, changing temperature
is a viable method for disturbing the LDH equilibrium and can be used
to study the dynamics of this redistribution.
Temperature-Jump Kinetics
The relaxation times for
establishing new equilibria among the IR detected substates and the
product states are determined by laser-induced temperature jump relaxation
spectroscopy employing IR probes at infrared frequencies representative
of each of the substates noted above. We used 1710 cm–1 to study the freepyruvate population as well as 1704, 1685, 1679,
and 1670 cm–1 to study the 1703, 1686, 1679, and
1674 cm–1 protein-bound pyruvate bands, respectively,
under an assumption of one substate for each probe frequency. Although
it is possible, and probably likely, that there are more than these
five pyruvate substates present and contributing overlapping signals,
this is the minimum number of states that can fit our equilibrium
data. At the probe frequencies used to study the bound pyruvate substates,
we can safely assume that the dominant contributor to each spectroscopic
signal is the assigned substate from equilibrium. Using the fitting
parameters presented in ref (25), we can estimate the relative contribution of each of the
substates to a given probe frequency. This analysis suggests that
the probe frequencies are dominated by the assigned substate in a
range of 75–100% contribution. The full analysis is presented
in Table S1 (Supporting Information).Figure 3 shows the relaxation transient at
each probe wavelength from 10 μs to 1 ms. The lower limit of
this range is set by the response time of the instrument, and the
upper limit is determined by the cooling time of the sample after
the temperature jump occurs (typically several ms for this sample
configuration). The data presented in the figure represent jumps of
the sample to the same final temperature, 30 °C, but different
initial temperatures. T-jumps to a final temperature of 30 °C
optimize the change in the 12C2=O stretch infrared
absorbance from any of the lower temperatures (Figure 2) while avoiding cavitation artifacts observed at higher temperature.
The 1710 and 1704 cm–1 IR transients were obtained
with a jump from an initial temperature of 15 °C. The other three
probe frequencies had an initial temperature of 22 °C. The initial
temperature determines the populations of the various states, whereas
the final temperature has a direct effect on the relaxation kinetics,
depending on the activation energies. The difference in the initial
temperatures affects the amplitude of the transients, scaling to a
good approximation as the size of the temperature jump. Therefore,
the transient relaxation lifetimes for jumps to the same final temperature
are comparable directly, but comparison of the magnitude requires
adjustment to the size of the T-jump. Beyond 1 ms, the solution begins
to cool and it is not possible to separate further changes in the
IR signal due to the enzyme dynamics from the cooling induced changes.
The relaxation transients are all well fit to a single function, as
shown in Figure 3, except for the 1704 cm–1 data. A double exponential function is required to
achieve a reasonable fit of the 1704 cm–1 transient.
The fit lifetimes are provided in Table 1.
Figure 3
Isotope-labeled
IR difference temperature-jump relaxation transients
of [U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-12C]pyruvate minus [U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-13C]pyruvate at various probe frequencies. Each probe frequency
is plotted as a different color as specified in the legend, and the
exponential fits are plotted as black lines.
Table 1
Exponential Fit Lifetimes for Temperature-Jump
Data
probe frequency
experimental
relaxation lifetime
simulation
relaxation lifetime
1710 cm–1
69 ± 6 μs
63.6 ± 0.6 μs
1704 cm–1
33 ± 3 μs (14%)a
332.0 ± 0.6 μs
480 ± 20 μs (86%)a
1685 cm–1
254 ± 3 μs
245.6 ± 0.6 μs
1679 cm–1
128 ± 1 μs
134.0 ± 0.4 μs
1670 cm–1
44.2 ± 0.6 μs
93.81 ± 0.04 μs
Percent contribution
of the phase
to the overall fit.
Isotope-labeled
IR difference temperature-jump relaxation transients
of [U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-12C]pyruvate minus [U-15N, -13C]LDH•NADH•[2-13C]pyruvate at various probe frequencies. Each probe frequency
is plotted as a different color as specified in the legend, and the
exponential fits are plotted as black lines.Percent contribution
of the phase
to the overall fit.The
1685, 1679, and 1670 cm–1 transients each
show a negative amplitude signal with a sub-millisecond relaxation
lifetime that depends on the probe frequency; the fit lifetime decreases
as the probe frequency decreases. The negative amplitudes indicate
a net flux out of the Michaelis states at the final temperature of
the T-jump. The observed relaxation rate at each probe frequency depends
on both the flux into (the loop closure step) and out of (the hydride
transfer step) the Michaelis states. The kinetics model we developed
to describe the overall reaction (described below) indicates that
the relaxation is dominated by the chemistry step, leading to an overall
decrease in population of the Michaelis states. Consequently, the
rate of the hydride transfer is inversely correlated with the frequency
of the C2 carbonyl stretch (the rate increases as the frequency decreases).
Because the C2 carbonyl stretch frequency is directly related to the
bond strength, or the polarization of the bond, it correlates with
the reactivity toward hydride transfer. Such a correlation is consistent
with previous studies relating the frequency of the C2 carbonyl vibration
to the rate of enzymatic turnover.[26,34,35] Previous studies generated a series of mutations
of LDH from B. stearothermophilus to alter the hydrogen
bonding network at the active site. Isotope edited FTIR spectroscopy
was used to determine the effect of these mutations on the frequency
of the C2 carbonyl stretch and thus how the altered hydrogen bonding
affects the polarity of the C2 carbonyl. These studies concluded that
an increase in the polarity of the bond is directly correlated to
an increase in the hydride transfer rate.The present work is
a more direct observation of the relationship
between carbonyl bond polarity and the rate of hydride transfer, because it compares different conformations of the same enzyme. The transients observed for the substates probed by 1685, 1679,
and 1670 cm–1 depend on the rate of chemical transition
from pyruvate to lactate. This conclusion is also consistent with
the observation that in the equilibrium measurements this cluster
of infrared bands has the lowest stretch frequency and highest polarity,
and therefore it represents substates closest to forming lactate.
Importantly, the amplitudes of these transients are all negative,
indicating a decrease in population of the substates, due at least
in part to shifting the equilibrium toward lactate. Furthermore, the
substate transients are independent in time, and there is no evidence
of correlated changes expected for direct interconversion of one substate
to another. Specifically, if substate A is directly converted to substate
B, then we should observe a decrease in the infrared absorbance of
A and a corresponding increase in the infrared absorbance of B; these
signals would be correlated in time with amplitudes of comparable
but opposite sign. We have previously observed direct interconversion
in studies of phLDH with the Michaelis complex substrate analogue,
oxamate.[29] Such behavior is not observed
in the present case. Therefore, we assign this cluster of bands to
a set of activated conformations within a parallel reaction pathway.
In this context, activated indicates the complexes are ready to perform
chemistry, analogous to the Michaelis complex in a simplified reaction
scheme. We have also previously reported evidence of a parallel reaction
pathway in the phLDH•NADH•oxamate system.[29] The observation that the substates follow parallel
pathways and have different reactivities is important because it is
in direct contrast to conventional enzyme models in which the chemistry
occurs by crossing a single dominant activation barrier.In
contrast, the 1704 cm–1 transient shows a
positive absorbance change and the 1710 cm–1 absorbance
of freepyruvate is changed very little. The 1704 cm–1 transient is fit to a faster phase with an approximately 35 μs
time constant that contributes 14% of the total signal intensity and
a slower, 500 μs, phase that contributes the rest. This transient
forms an important counterpart to the 1685, 1679, and 1670 cm–1 transients. Since the 1704 cm–1 transient has an intensity of the opposite sign and also effectively
spans the time scale of the lower frequency bleaches, we conclude
that a fraction of the population of the three Michaelis complex substates
is transforming directly into the 1704 cm–1 substate.
The 1704 cm–1 transient absorbance only accounts
for about half of the sum of the bleach features, however, meaning
the rest of the population of the Michaelis states is converting to
product. We assign the 1704 cm–1 band as an encounter
complex formed between LDH•NADH and pyruvate at an early stage
of binding along the reaction pathway, characterized by weak hydrogen
bonding between the protein and C2=O moiety of pyruvate. Evidence
for such a state has been observed before in other studies with phLDH.[29,30,36] The 1710 cm–1 transient signal of freepyruvate shows a small increase on a fast
time scale that is not well correlated with the other signals. The
small magnitude of this transient and its uncorrelated time dependence
imply that only a small amount of freepyruvate is formed in response
to the T-jump, most likely from the encounter complex directly and
not from the Michaelis states.To summarize, the transient IR
data indicate three features of
the enzyme reaction mechanism: first, the existence of several Michaelis
complex conformations well advanced along the reaction pathway that
do not directly interconvert and are characterized by varied reactivity
for the chemical conversion of pyruvate to lactate; second, the existence
of an encounter complex that interconverts to the activated conformations;
third, the lack of a direct pathway between freepyruvate and the
Michaelis states, meaning the encounter complex is an obligatory intermediate.
The simplest model that incorporates all of the above conclusions
from the temperature-jump data is presented in Scheme 1 below.
Scheme 1
Additional support for this scheme comes from
a significant body
of previous work. The salient points are initial binding via the formation
of a weakly interacting encounter complex,[29,30,36] protein conformational changes associated
with forming the Michaelis complex,[37] multiple
well populated conformations within the Michaelis complex which do
not directly interconvert, and one of these populations being incompetent
toward conversion to lactate.[16,38,39] A key finding from previous work is that a slow conformational motion
within the enzyme is likely rate limiting, not the chemistry step
itself. The protein motion that limits enzyme turnover involves the
closure of the surface loop (residues 98–110) to bring the
key residue, Arg109, into the active site (see Figure 1), accompanied by changes far from the active site.[37] This conformational change is represented in
Scheme 1 as the transition between the encounter
complex (1704 cm–1) and the reactive Michaelis states.
Steady state kinetics measurements of the LDH enzyme yielded a kcat of 245 s–1 with a KIE
of 1.4 comparing enzyme loaded with NADD versus NADH.[25] This value for the H/D primary KIE is lower than expected;
a characteristic value of six or more would be observed if the chemical
step were rate limiting. We conclude that the various protein atomic
rearrangements occurring within the phLDH•NADH•pyruvate
complex are on a similar time scale as the chemical step (steps 2
and 3, respectively, in Scheme 1), such that
they are strongly coupled kinetically.To test the validity of Scheme 1, we developed
a computational routine to fit the
reaction scheme to previous results (fluorescence T-jumps) as well
as the new results from the IR temperature-jump data. The details
of this routine are discussed in the Materials and
Methods section and in the Supporting Information. In essence, the routine searches for rate constants to define a
given reaction scheme that will match input relaxation data. This
method incorporates all coupled reaction steps and does not require
making simplifying assumptions about dominant pathways. The fit data
in Table 1 show that the transients are changing
on similar time scales; therefore, making assumptions about dominant
pathways is unwarranted.We first attempted to fit the relaxation
data with the mechanism presented in Scheme 1. We used the rate constants and activation energies adapted from
previous optical absorption and emission T-jump studies of phLDH as
initial guesses.[24] However, the calculations
did not fit well to all of the experimental transients with the calculations
consistently reporting scores of 50–100 (lower is better, see
the Materials and Methods) for the trajectories.
Starting trajectories with random rate constants did not produce better
scores. Upon analysis of the results, two types of fits were produced.
Either all of the transients except the 1704 cm–1 transient were fit well or the 1704 cm–1 was fit
well and the rest were not. Figure 4A shows
a representative fit using the kinetics model defined by Scheme 1. Step-wise adjustments to the reaction mechanism
were made to test how well new models fit to the experimental data.
We include a representative sample of some of these other schemes
in the Supporting Information. Still, none
of the various models attempted were significantly better. We conclude
that the mechanism presented in Scheme 1 is
not sufficient to describe the relaxation data.
Figure 4
Comparison of the simulated
relaxation kinetics (dashed lines)
with the experimental data (solid lines). Graph A uses Scheme 1 as the reaction model for simulated results. Graph
B uses Scheme 2 as the reaction model for simulated
results. The most significant change is the better fit for the 1704
cm–1 transient when Scheme 2 is used.
Comparison of the simulated
relaxation kinetics (dashed lines)
with the experimental data (solid lines). Graph A uses Scheme 1 as the reaction model for simulated results. Graph
B uses Scheme 2 as the reaction model for simulated
results. The most significant change is the better fit for the 1704
cm–1 transient when Scheme 2 is used.
Scheme 2
Various other possible kinetic
schemes were tried; these mostly
involved tweaking the treatment of the 1704 cm–1 substate (see the Supporting Information), which produced dramatic improvement of the model. We focused on
this substate because the results, like those of Figure 4A, indicate that 1704 cm–1 was somehow different
than the other substates. The best model was the inclusion of a second
encounter complex with the constraint that it could be populated only
from freepyruvate (and hence is not along the reaction pathway to
lactate formation). Scheme 2 summarizes this
new kinetic mechanism. In this scheme, the encounter complex state
labeled LDH•NADH•py has no discernible IR signature.
The lack of an IR signal is probably due to the heterogeneous nature
of this state. Most likely what we are labeling as one state is in
reality a multitude of similar weakly bound pyruvate states along
a productive pathway. This heterogeneity would lead to a very broad
infrared band that would be hard to detect except at high concentrations.
Our simulations indicate that this substate has a concentration of
2.9 μM at equilibrium. In contrast, the 1704 cm–1 substate has a distinct, tightly bound pyruvate conformation leading
to a narrower IR band that allows detection of this state even at
low (3.8 μM) concentration. There is previous computational
evidence for an array of bound pyruvate structures in lactate dehydrogenase
that support this concept.[33] The addition
of an additional substate resulted in two more microscopic rate constants.
Previously experimentally derived rate constants were assumed for
the competent encounter complex.[24] The
values are presented in Table S2 (). The result of
the change was to increase the overall population of this state at
elevated temperature in the simulation and therefore increase the
absorbance at 1704 cm–1.The model summarized
in Scheme 2 fits the
experimental data well in a number of ways. It is qualitatively obvious
by looking at Figure 4B that the new model
better matches each of the experimental transients than the fits shown
in Figure 4A. Quantitatively, the routine-specific
score values of 3–5 were drastically better for the new model
as compared to the original model’s scores of 50–100.
Finally, we can see by comparison in Table 1 that the observed relaxation lifetimes calculated by fitting the
theoretical transients are similar to the observed relaxation lifetimes
from the experimental data. The inclusion of a dead-end or noncompetent
state along the reaction pathway is not a new concept. We have previously
seen evidence for a dead-end complex when studying the phLDH system
with the substrate mimic oxamate using infrared as the probing method.[29] However, the oxamate work suggested the observed
dead-end complex was a well-populated Michaelis conformation instead
of an encounter complex. Scheme 2 is not intended
to assert that there are no additional Michaelis conformations, or
that all activated conformations are productive. Instead, Scheme 2 is the simplest model that fits the experimental
data, and it supports multiple enzyme conformations at both the encounter
and Michaelis complex stages of the reaction pathway. There is no
evidence for dead-end complexes when the pyruvate system is studied
using only NADH fluorescence as a probe.[24] In work on a nitrated mutant enzyme, Clarke and co-workers did see
evidence of multiple enzyme-bound pyruvate states where one such state
was significantly slower reacting at cryo-temperatures using stopped
flow.[40] They suggested these states could
slowly interconvert directly. It is possible that our second encounter
complex may in fact be the second pathway they suggest but that it
is interconverting or reacting too slowly to observe in our experiments
and is essentially nonproductive.There are differences between
the experimental and simulated transients,
even for the best fit to Scheme 2, including
the best fit of the 1704 cm–1 transient to a single
exponential and a longer lifetime for the 1670 cm–1 transient in the simulation. The simulated lifetime for the 1704
cm–1 transient is in between the two lifetimes of
the double exponential fit of the experimental data. This difference
is likely due to the noise and small subtraction artifacts present
in the experimental data that make it difficult to fit the data. The
simulation also predicts a longer lifetime for the 1670 cm–1 transient than what is observed experimentally. The transient IR
signal for this state is very small due to its low population, making
it difficult to fit. It is also possible that the rate constants for
this state are not fully optimized in the simulation, since it only
contributes a small fraction of the total reaction flux. It is important
to point out that, despite these small discrepancies, the model still
predicts a decreasing lifetime with decreasing probe frequency.The defining feature of the kinetic model in Scheme 2 is parallel pathways with Michaelis states of varied reactivity.
Furthermore, the model indicates that the reactivity scales with the
frequency of the pyruvate C2 carbonyl stretching frequency: the lower
the frequency, the higher the reactivity (shorter lifetime for the
chemistry step). This relationship can be understood in terms of the
relationship of the vibrational frequency to the force constant and
hence the bond distance or the degree of polarization of the bond.
In the diatomic approximation, a shift of the carbonyl mode from 1710
to 1679 cm–1 represents a lengthening of the C=O
bond by 0.01 Å,[41] making it more susceptible
to nucleophilic attack by the hydride. It is interesting to note that
the enzyme does not primarily bind pyruvate in the most reactive substate.
At equilibrium, the 1679 cm–1 substate is clearly
the most populated one, as shown in Figure 2. Since these substates do not interconvert directly, the net flux
through each depends on the branching from the initial encounter complex.
Apparently the enzyme is not optimized to primarily use the fastest
pathway, and the overall turnover rate is a population weighted average
of the multiple parallel pathways. The model outlined in Scheme 2 predicts an ensemble averaged turnover rate of kcat = 179 s–1 (see the Supporting Information), which is similar to
the average turnover rate determined from NADH absorbance measurements, kcat = 245 s–1.[25] Thus, the IR measurements provide a high-resolution
view of all of the relevant substates in the enzyme reaction pathway
in contrast to simply observing the ensemble turnover rate.
Conclusions
In this work, we examined the reaction pathway of pig heart LDH
using infrared absorbance. Through analysis of equilibrium spectra,
relaxation transients, and subsequent kinetic modeling, we developed
a novel scheme for LDH catalysis that involves several branching pathways
and supports the presence of a dead-end complex. Our results not only
provide direct evidence for the population of various enzyme conformations,
but they also indicate that the enzyme samples multiple conformations
while performing catalysis. This observation provides further support
for a dynamic view of enzyme catalysis where the role of the enzyme
is not just to bring reactants together but also to guide the conformational
search for chemically competent interactions.The inclusion
of substates that are off an optimal kinetic pathway
is particularly interesting when considering the induced fit framework
for understanding enzyme reactions. In this framework, the binding
of substrate induces conformational changes in the enzyme that are
necessary for catalytic action.[42] The presence
of a noncompetent encounter complex complicates this framework because
it suggests the induced conformational change can be wrong. Because
this noncompetent encounter complex does not convert to the competent
one directly, the enzyme must release the substrate and try again.
This result also implies that the enzyme is not perfectly preorganized
for any interactions with substrate but is instead in a dynamic search
for the correct interaction with substrate that will lead to catalysis.
The presence of similar heterogeneity in the activated conformations
indicates this search is not complete once substrate binds to the
enzyme. The search continues throughout the reaction pathway. Furthermore,
our results indicate that the various Michaelis states are catalytically
competent at different rates. This finding implies that the enzyme’s
conformational search is not necessarily for one optimal pathway or
conformation but simply for one that will work. The enzyme, therefore,
has not eliminated the search for the correct reactant interaction,
as compared to solution-phase chemistry, but instead provides a platform
for greatly reducing the search. The nonoptimized nature of many enzymes
has already been noted by other researchers, so it is interesting
to consider whether the imperfection in the search process is part
of the evolutionary fine-tuning of an enzyme to keep turnover rates
from becoming so fast as to throw off biological equilibrium.[43] For this reason, we expect populations of catalytically
relevant heterogeneous structures to be an important conserved feature
of many enzymes.