Literature DB >> 28627164

Thermodynamic and Structural Adaptation Differences between the Mesophilic and Psychrophilic Lactate Dehydrogenases.

Sergei Khrapunov1, Eric Chang1, Robert H Callender1.   

Abstract

The thermodynamics of substrate binding and enzymatic activity of a glycolytic enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), from both porcine heart, phLDH (Sus scrofa; a mesophile), and mackerel icefish, cgLDH (Chamapsocephalus gunnari; a psychrophile), were investigated. Using a novel and quite sensitive fluorescence assay that can distinguish protein conformational changes close to and distal from the substrate binding pocket, a reversible global protein structural transition preceding the high-temperature transition (denaturation) was surprisingly found to coincide with a marked change in enzymatic activity for both LDHs. A similar reversible structural transition of the active site structure was observed for phLDH but not for cgLDH. An observed lower substrate binding affinity for cgLDH compared to that for phLDH was accompanied by a larger contribution of entropy to ΔG, which reflects a higher functional plasticity of the psychrophilic cgLDH compared to that of the mesophilic phLDH. The natural osmolyte, trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), increases stability and shifts all structural transitions to higher temperatures for both orthologs while simultaneously reducing catalytic activity. The presence of TMAO causes cgLDH to adopt catalytic parameters like those of phLDH in the absence of the osmolyte. Our results are most naturally understood within a model of enzyme dynamics whereby different conformations of the enzyme that have varied catalytic parameters (i.e., binding and catalytic proclivity) and whose population profiles are temperature-dependent and influenced by osmolytes interconvert among themselves. Our results also show that adaptation can be achieved by means other than gene mutations and complements the synchronic evolution of the cellular milieu.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28627164      PMCID: PMC5574168          DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  50 in total

Review 1.  Interpreting the effects of small uncharged solutes on protein-folding equilibria.

Authors:  P R Davis-Searles; A J Saunders; D A Erie; D J Winzor; G J Pielak
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Psychrophilic enzymes: a thermodynamic challenge.

Authors:  C Gerday; M Aittaleb; J L Arpigny; E Baise; J P Chessa; G Garsoux; I Petrescu; G Feller
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1997-10-17

3.  Effect of osmolytes on protein dynamics in the lactate dehydrogenase-catalyzed reaction.

Authors:  Nickolay Zhadin; Robert Callender
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Toward an understanding of the role of dynamics on enzymatic catalysis in lactate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Miriam Gulotta; Hua Deng; Hong Deng; R Brian Dyer; Robert H Callender
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2002-03-12       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Mechanistic Analysis of Fluorescence Quenching of Reduced Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide by Oxamate in Lactate Dehydrogenase Ternary Complexes.

Authors:  Huo-Lei Peng; Robert Callender
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Site-directed mutagenesis reveals role of mobile arginine residue in lactate dehydrogenase catalysis.

Authors:  A R Clarke; D B Wigley; W N Chia; D Barstow; T Atkinson; J J Holbrook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Dec 18-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Stability and folding mechanism of mesophilic, thermophilic and hyperthermophilic archael histones: the importance of folding intermediates.

Authors:  Traci B Topping; Lisa M Gloss
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-03       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Conformational Heterogeneity in the Michaelis Complex of Lactate Dehydrogenase: An Analysis of Vibrational Spectroscopy Using Markov and Hidden Markov Models.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Pan; Steven D Schwartz
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Lactate dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic bacterium thermotoga maritima: the crystal structure at 2.1 A resolution reveals strategies for intrinsic protein stabilization.

Authors:  G Auerbach; R Ostendorp; L Prade; I Korndörfer; T Dams; R Huber; R Jaenicke
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  The dynamical nature of enzymatic catalysis.

Authors:  Robert Callender; R Brian Dyer
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 22.384

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effect of Protein Isotope Labeling on the Catalytic Mechanism of Lactate Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Egawa; Hua Deng; Eric Chang; Robert Callender
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Activity-Related Microsecond Dynamics Revealed by Temperature-Jump Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Measurements on Thermophilic Alcohol Dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Morgan B Vaughn; Jianyu Zhang; Thomas G Spiro; R Brian Dyer; Judith P Klinman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Structure, Function, and Thermodynamics of Lactate Dehydrogenases from Humans and the Malaria Parasite P. falciparum.

Authors:  Sergei Khrapunov; Akiba Waterman; Rudra Persaud; Eric P Chang
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Pressure tolerance of deep-sea enzymes can be evolved through increasing volume changes in protein transitions: a study with lactate dehydrogenases from abyssal and hadal fishes.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Gerringer; Paul H Yancey; Olga V Tikhonova; Nikita E Vavilov; Victor G Zgoda; Dmitri R Davydov
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.542

5.  A Novel Cold-Adapted Leucine Dehydrogenase from Antarctic Sea-Ice Bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. ANT178.

Authors:  Yatong Wang; Yanhua Hou; Yifan Wang; Lu Zheng; Xianlei Xu; Kang Pan; Rongqi Li; Quanfu Wang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.118

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.