Literature DB >> 18572214

Mathematical properties of the r2 measure of linkage disequilibrium.

Jenna M VanLiere1, Noah A Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Statistics for linkage disequilibrium (LD), the non-random association of alleles at two loci, depend on the frequencies of the alleles at the loci under consideration. Here, we examine the r(2) measure of LD and its mathematical relationship to allele frequencies, quantifying the constraints on its maximum value. Assuming independent uniform distributions for the allele frequencies of two biallelic loci, we find that the mean maximum value of r(2) is approximately 0.43051, and that r(2) can exceed a threshold of 4/5 in only approximately 14.232% of the allele frequency space. If one locus is assumed to have known allele frequencies--the situation in an association study in which LD between a known marker locus and an unknown trait locus is of interest--we find that the mean maximum value of r(2) is greatest when the known locus has a minor allele frequency of approximately 0.30131. We find that in 1/4 of the space of allowed values of minor allele frequencies and haplotype frequencies at a pair of loci, the unconstrained maximum r(2) allowing for the possibility of recombination between the loci exceeds the constrained maximum assuming that no recombination has occurred. Finally, we use r(max)(2) to examine the connection between r(2) and the D(') measure of linkage disequilibrium, finding that r(2)/r(max)(2)=D('2) for approximately 72.683% of the space of allowed values of (p(a),p(b),p(ab)). Our results concerning the properties of r(2) have the potential to inform the interpretation of unusual LD behavior and to assist in the design of LD-based association-mapping studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18572214      PMCID: PMC2580747          DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  20 in total

1.  Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Christopher S Carlson; Michael A Eberle; Mark J Rieder; Qian Yi; Leonid Kruglyak; Deborah A Nickerson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Efficiency and power in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Paul I W de Bakker; Roman Yelensky; Itsik Pe'er; Stacey B Gabriel; Mark J Daly; David Altshuler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-10-23       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Coverage and power in genomewide association studies.

Authors:  Eric Jorgenson; John S Witte
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The Interaction of Selection and Linkage. I. General Considerations; Heterotic Models.

Authors:  R C Lewontin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Successful design and conduct of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Christopher I Amos
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping.

Authors:  B Devlin; N Risch
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1995-09-20       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 7.  Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Przeworski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-14       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Linkage disequilibrium--understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Allele frequency matching between SNPs reveals an excess of linkage disequilibrium in genic regions of the human genome.

Authors:  Michael A Eberle; Mark J Rieder; Leonid Kruglyak; Deborah A Nickerson
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Power to detect risk alleles using genome-wide tag SNP panels.

Authors:  Michael A Eberle; Pauline C Ng; Kenneth Kuhn; Lixin Zhou; Daniel A Peiffer; Luana Galver; Karine A Viaud-Martinez; Cynthia Taylor Lawley; Kevin L Gunderson; Richard Shen; Sarah S Murray
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  65 in total

1.  Crohn's disease risk alleles on the NOD2 locus have been maintained by natural selection on standing variation.

Authors:  Shigeki Nakagome; Shuhei Mano; Lukasz Kozlowski; Janusz M Bujnicki; Hiroki Shibata; Yasuaki Fukumaki; Judith R Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Shoji Kawamura; Hiroki Oota
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Using Ascertainment for Targeted Resequencing to Increase Power to Identify Causal Variants.

Authors:  M D Swartz; B Peng; C Reyes-Gibby; S Shete
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.582

3.  The impact of accelerating faster than exponential population growth on genetic variation.

Authors:  Mark Reppell; Michael Boehnke; Sebastian Zöllner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  One Hundred Years of Linkage Disequilibrium.

Authors:  John A Sved; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  LD-annot: A Bioinformatics Tool to Automatically Provide Candidate SNPs With Annotations for Genetically Linked Genes.

Authors:  Julien Prunier; Audrey Lemaçon; Alexandre Bastien; Mohsen Jafarikia; Ilga Porth; Claude Robert; Arnaud Droit
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Upper bounds on FST in terms of the frequency of the most frequent allele and total homozygosity: the case of a specified number of alleles.

Authors:  Michael D Edge; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Enhancing the mathematical properties of new haplotype homozygosity statistics for the detection of selective sweeps.

Authors:  Nandita R Garud; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 8.  Current status on Alzheimer disease molecular genetics: from past, to present, to future.

Authors:  Karolien Bettens; Kristel Sleegers; Christine Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Comparison of linkage disequilibrium and haplotype diversity on macro- and microchromosomes in chicken.

Authors:  Hendrik-Jan Megens; Richard P M A Crooijmans; John W M Bastiaansen; Hindrik H D Kerstens; Albart Coster; Ruud Jalving; Addie Vereijken; Pradeepa Silva; William M Muir; Hans H Cheng; Olivier Hanotte; Martien A M Groenen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Discovery of rare variants via sequencing: implications for the design of complex trait association studies.

Authors:  Bingshan Li; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.