Literature DB >> 30589985

G ST ' , Jost's D, and FST are similarly constrained by allele frequencies: A mathematical, simulation, and empirical study.

Nicolas Alcala1, Noah A Rosenberg1.   

Abstract

Statistics G ST ' and Jost's D have been proposed for replacing FST as measures of genetic differentiation. A principal argument in favour of these statistics is the independence of their maximal values with respect to the subpopulation heterozygosity HS , a property not shared by FST . Nevertheless, it has been unclear if these alternative differentiation measures are constrained by other aspects of the allele frequencies. Here, for biallelic markers, we study the mathematical properties of the maximal values of G ST ' and D, comparing them to those of FST . We show that G ST ' and D exhibit the same peculiar frequency-dependence phenomena as FST , including a maximal value as a function of the frequency of the most frequent allele that lies well below one. Although the functions describing G ST ' , D, and FST in terms of the frequency of the most frequent allele are different, the allele frequencies that maximize them are identical. Moreover, we show using coalescent simulations that when taking into account the specific maximal values of the three statistics, their behaviours become similar across a large range of migration rates. We use our results to explain two empirical patterns: the similar values of the three statistics among North American wolves, and the low D values compared to G ST ' and FST in Atlantic salmon. The results suggest that the three statistics are often predictably similar, so that they can make quite similar contributions to data analysis. When they are not similar, the difference can be understood in relation to features of genetic diversity.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allele frequency; gene flow; genetic differentiation; migration; population structure

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30589985      PMCID: PMC6821915          DOI: 10.1111/mec.15000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  31 in total

1.  Reliable Detection of Loci Responsible for Local Adaptation: Inference of a Null Model through Trimming the Distribution of F(ST).

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock; Katie E Lotterhos
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure.

Authors:  Patrick G Meirmans
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Inbreeding coefficients and coalescence times.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation.

Authors:  Lou Jost
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation G(ST), D(EST) and G'(ST): how wrong have we been?

Authors:  R Heller; H R Siegismund
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Mathematical Constraints on FST: Biallelic Markers in Arbitrarily Many Populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  ISOLATION BY DISTANCE IN EQUILIBRIUM AND NON-EQUILIBRIUM POPULATIONS.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Effective number of alleles in a subdivided population.

Authors:  T Maruyama
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 1.570

10.  SNP-array reveals genome-wide patterns of geographical and potential adaptive divergence across the natural range of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  Vincent Bourret; Matthew P Kent; Craig R Primmer; Anti Vasemägi; Sten Karlsson; Kjetil Hindar; Philip McGinnity; Eric Verspoor; Louis Bernatchez; Sigbjørn Lien
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  7 in total

1.  On the heterozygosity of an admixed population.

Authors:  Simina M Boca; Lucy Huang; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Allele Frequency Difference AFD⁻An Intuitive Alternative to FST for Quantifying Genetic Population Differentiation.

Authors:  Daniel Berner
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.096

3.  Detecting steps in spatial genetic data: Which diversity measures are best?

Authors:  Alexander T Sentinella; Angela T Moles; Jason G Bragg; Maurizio Rossetto; William B Sherwin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mathematical constraints on FST: multiallelic markers in arbitrarily many populations.

Authors:  Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 5.  The background and legacy of Lewontin's apportionment of human genetic diversity.

Authors:  John Novembre
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.671

6.  High levels of inbreeding with spatial and host-associated structure in lice of an endangered freshwater seal.

Authors:  Stephany Virrueta Herrera; Kevin P Johnson; Andrew D Sweet; Eeva Ylinen; Mervi Kunnasranta; Tommi Nyman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.622

7.  FSTruct: An FST -based tool for measuring ancestry variation in inference of population structure.

Authors:  Maike L Morrison; Nicolas Alcala; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 8.678

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.