Literature DB >> 25051976

Comparative study of hepatic venography using non-linear-blending images, monochromatic images and low-voltage images of dual-energy CT.

Q Wang1, S Gaofeng, F Xueli, W Lijia, W Runze.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of non-linear-blending and monochromatic dual-energy CT (DECT) images to improve the image quality of hepatic venography.
METHODS: 82 patients undergoing abdominal DECT in the portal venous phase were enrolled. For each patient, 31 data sets of monochromatic images and 7 data sets of non-linear-blending images were generated. The data sets of the non-linear-blending and monochromatic images with the best contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for hepatic veins were selected and compared with the images obtained at 80 kVp and a simulated 120 kVp. The subjective image quality of the hepatic veins was evaluated using a four-point scale. The image quality of the hepatic veins was analysed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and CNR values.
RESULTS: The optimal CNR between hepatic veins and the liver was obtained with the non-linear-blending images. Compared with the other three groups, there were significant differences in the maximum CNR, the SNR, the subjective ratings and the minimum background noise (p < 0.001). A comparison of the monochromatic and 80-kVp images revealed that the CNR and subjective ratings were both improved (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CNR or subjective ratings between the simulated 120-kVp group and the control group (p = 0.090 and 0.053, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The non-linear-blending technique for acquiring DECT provided the best image quality for hepatic venography. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DECT can enhance the contrast of hepatic veins and the liver, potentially allowing the wider use of low-dose contrast agents for CT examination of the liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25051976      PMCID: PMC4170862          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

Review 1.  Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why.

Authors:  Elliot K Fishman; Derek R Ney; David G Heath; Frank M Corl; Karen M Horton; Pamela T Johnson
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography: effect on contrast enhancement, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality in computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Florian F Behrendt; Bernhard Schmidt; Cédric Plumhans; Sebastian Keil; Seth G Woodruff; Diana Ackermann; Georg Mühlenbruch; Thomas Flohr; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Optimal contrast of computed tomography portal venography using dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Gaofeng Shi; Xiang Liu; Runze Wu; Shijie Wang
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Assessment of the hepatic veins in poor contrast conditions using dual energy CT: evaluation of a novel monoenergetic extrapolation software algorithm.

Authors:  C Schabel; M Bongers; M Sedlmair; A Korn; U Grosse; S Mangold; C D Claussen; C Thomas
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2014-04-22

5.  Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography for detection of hypervascular liver hepatocellular carcinoma: phantom and preliminary studies.

Authors:  Kyung Su Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Seung Ho Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Seung Hyun Cho; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Virtual unenhanced images of the abdomen with second-generation dual-source dual-energy computed tomography: image quality and liver lesion detection.

Authors:  Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Anna Darnell; Napoleón Macías; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Sonia Rodríguez; Jordi Rimola; Mario Pagés; Angeles García-Criado; Marco Rengo; Andrea Laghi; Carmen Ayuso
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Spectral optimization of chest CT angiography with reduced iodine load: experience in 80 patients evaluated with dual-source, dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Marie-Aurélie Delesalle; François Pontana; Alain Duhamel; Jean-Baptiste Faivre; Thomas Flohr; Nunzia Tacelli; Jacques Remy; Martine Remy-Jardin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Feasibility of single-source dual-energy computed tomography for urinary stone characterization and value of iterative reconstructions.

Authors:  Fabian Morsbach; Moritz C Wurnig; Daniel Müller; Bernhard Krauss; Johannes Georg Korporaal; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 9.  Dual-energy and low-kVp CT in the abdomen.

Authors:  Benjamin M Yeh; John A Shepherd; Zhen J Wang; Hui Seong Teh; Robert P Hartman; Sven Prevrhal
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Could temporal window for the computed tomography hepatic venography (CTHV) be extended?: A comparative study between spectral and conventional CT using porcine models.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Yudong Qiu; Jian He; Zhengyang Zhou; Baoxin Li; Bin Zhu; Xizhao Sun
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative Imaging and Image Fusion for Venous Interventions.

Authors:  Ponraj Chinnadurai; Jean Bismuth
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.