Q Wang1, S Gaofeng, F Xueli, W Lijia, W Runze. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, the Fourth Clinical Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of non-linear-blending and monochromatic dual-energy CT (DECT) images to improve the image quality of hepatic venography. METHODS: 82 patients undergoing abdominal DECT in the portal venous phase were enrolled. For each patient, 31 data sets of monochromatic images and 7 data sets of non-linear-blending images were generated. The data sets of the non-linear-blending and monochromatic images with the best contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for hepatic veins were selected and compared with the images obtained at 80 kVp and a simulated 120 kVp. The subjective image quality of the hepatic veins was evaluated using a four-point scale. The image quality of the hepatic veins was analysed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and CNR values. RESULTS: The optimal CNR between hepatic veins and the liver was obtained with the non-linear-blending images. Compared with the other three groups, there were significant differences in the maximum CNR, the SNR, the subjective ratings and the minimum background noise (p < 0.001). A comparison of the monochromatic and 80-kVp images revealed that the CNR and subjective ratings were both improved (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CNR or subjective ratings between the simulated 120-kVp group and the control group (p = 0.090 and 0.053, respectively). CONCLUSION: The non-linear-blending technique for acquiring DECT provided the best image quality for hepatic venography. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DECT can enhance the contrast of hepatic veins and the liver, potentially allowing the wider use of low-dose contrast agents for CT examination of the liver.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of non-linear-blending and monochromatic dual-energy CT (DECT) images to improve the image quality of hepatic venography. METHODS: 82 patients undergoing abdominal DECT in the portal venous phase were enrolled. For each patient, 31 data sets of monochromatic images and 7 data sets of non-linear-blending images were generated. The data sets of the non-linear-blending and monochromatic images with the best contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) for hepatic veins were selected and compared with the images obtained at 80 kVp and a simulated 120 kVp. The subjective image quality of the hepatic veins was evaluated using a four-point scale. The image quality of the hepatic veins was analysed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and CNR values. RESULTS: The optimal CNR between hepatic veins and the liver was obtained with the non-linear-blending images. Compared with the other three groups, there were significant differences in the maximum CNR, the SNR, the subjective ratings and the minimum background noise (p < 0.001). A comparison of the monochromatic and 80-kVp images revealed that the CNR and subjective ratings were both improved (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the CNR or subjective ratings between the simulated 120-kVp group and the control group (p = 0.090 and 0.053, respectively). CONCLUSION: The non-linear-blending technique for acquiring DECT provided the best image quality for hepatic venography. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DECT can enhance the contrast of hepatic veins and the liver, potentially allowing the wider use of low-dose contrast agents for CT examination of the liver.
Authors: Elliot K Fishman; Derek R Ney; David G Heath; Frank M Corl; Karen M Horton; Pamela T Johnson Journal: Radiographics Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Florian F Behrendt; Bernhard Schmidt; Cédric Plumhans; Sebastian Keil; Seth G Woodruff; Diana Ackermann; Georg Mühlenbruch; Thomas Flohr; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Kyung Su Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Seung Ho Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Soo Jin Kim; Seung Hyun Cho; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Anna Darnell; Napoleón Macías; Juan Ramón Ayuso; Sonia Rodríguez; Jordi Rimola; Mario Pagés; Angeles García-Criado; Marco Rengo; Andrea Laghi; Carmen Ayuso Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Fabian Morsbach; Moritz C Wurnig; Daniel Müller; Bernhard Krauss; Johannes Georg Korporaal; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Benjamin M Yeh; John A Shepherd; Zhen J Wang; Hui Seong Teh; Robert P Hartman; Sven Prevrhal Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.959