Literature DB >> 30410650

Intraoperative Imaging and Image Fusion for Venous Interventions.

Ponraj Chinnadurai1, Jean Bismuth2.   

Abstract

Advanced imaging for intraoperative evaluation of venous pathologies has played an increasingly significant role in this era of evolving minimally invasive surgical and interventional therapies. The evolution of dedicated venous stents and other novel interventional devices has mandated the need for advanced imaging tools to optimize safe and accurate device deployment. Most venous interventions are typically performed using a combination of standard 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy, digital-subtraction angiography, and intravascular ultrasound imaging techniques. Latest generation computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners have been shown to provide high-resolution 3D and 4D information about venous vasculature. In addition to morphological imaging, novel MRI techniques such as 3D time-resolved MR venography and 4D flow sequences can provide quantitative information and help visualize intricate flow patterns to better understand complex venous pathologies. Moreover, the high-fidelity information from multiple imaging techniques can be integrated using image fusion to overcome the limitations of current intraoperative imaging techniques. For example, the limitations of standard 2D fluoroscopy and luminal angiography can be compensated for by perivascular and soft-tissue information from MRI during complex venous interventions using image fusion techniques. Intraoperative dynamic evaluation of devices such as venous stents and real-time understanding of changes in flow patterns during venous interventions may be routinely available in future interventional suites with integrated multimodality CT or MR imaging capabilities. The purpose of this review is to discuss the outlook for intraoperative imaging and multimodality image fusion techniques and highlight their value during complex venous interventions.

Keywords:  MRI venous imaging; cone-beam CT imaging; image fusion; intraoperative imaging; multimodality image guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30410650      PMCID: PMC6217565          DOI: 10.14797/mdcj-14-3-200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J        ISSN: 1947-6108


  47 in total

Review 1.  Image fusion during vascular and nonvascular image-guided procedures.

Authors:  Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh; Hicham Kobeiter; Sheng Xu; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-09

Review 2.  Thrombus age is ideally measured by history or MRV prior to thrombus removal.

Authors:  N Bækgaard; P Foegh; C H A Wittens; C Arnoldussen
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.740

3.  Hemodialysis grafts: color Doppler flow imaging correlated with digital subtraction angiography and functional status.

Authors:  V Dousset; N Grenier; C Douws; P Senuita; G Sassouste; L Ada; L Potaux
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Cone-beam CT: vascular applications.

Authors:  John F Angle
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-09

5.  Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venography to evaluate central venous steno-occlusive disease in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  K Gao; H Jiang; R Y Zhai; J F Wang; B J Wei; Q Huang
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-01-02       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Application of TWIST MR angiography to aid successful central venous access in challenging patients: initial single-centre experience.

Authors:  L Armstrong; J C L Rodrigues; C B Lawton; J Tyrell-Price; M C K Hamilton; N E Manghat
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Multimodality Imaging in Transcatheter Mitral Interventions: Buzzword or Modern Age Toolbox?

Authors:  Omar K Khalique; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  "Bull's-eye" sign on gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance venography determines thrombus presence and age: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J B Froehlich; M R Prince; L J Greenfield; L J Downing; N L Shah; T W Wakefield
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  X-ray magnetic resonance fusion to internal markers and utility in congenital heart disease catheterization.

Authors:  Yoav Dori; Marily Sarmiento; Andrew C Glatz; Matthew J Gillespie; Virginia M Jones; Matthew A Harris; Kevin K Whitehead; Mark A Fogel; Jonathan J Rome
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  In vivo comparison of arterial lumen dimensions assessed by co-registered three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Liang Xu; Jurgen Ligthart; Bo Xu; Karen Witberg; Zhongwei Sun; Gerhard Koning; Johan H C Reiber; Evelyn Regar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.357

View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of different anaesthesia techniques on postoperative pain and hospital discharge in varicose vein surgery.

Authors:  Mehmet Mutlu; Seray Turkmen
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 0.802

2.  Intraprocedural guidance for recanalization of post-thrombotic venous lesions using live overlay of center lines from pre-operative cross-sectional imaging: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Sri Hari Sundararajan; Raphael Doustaly; Gregoire Avignon; David C Madoff; Ronald S Winokur
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2020-06-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.