OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to discuss the influence of tube potential on CT images and explore the potential impact of dual-energy CT on imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. CONCLUSION: Low peak tube voltage (kVp) settings provide high conspicuity of contrast materials at CT but may result in high image noise, particularly in larger patients. Material decomposition at dual-energy CT can differentiate renal stones by their composition, quantify tissue iron stores, improve the detection of pathologic hyperenhancement, and reduce contrast material and radiation dose compared with conventional CT. Further clinical research and technique refinement will be needed as the usage of these exciting technologies spreads.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to discuss the influence of tube potential on CT images and explore the potential impact of dual-energy CT on imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. CONCLUSION: Low peak tube voltage (kVp) settings provide high conspicuity of contrast materials at CT but may result in high image noise, particularly in larger patients. Material decomposition at dual-energy CT can differentiate renal stones by their composition, quantify tissue iron stores, improve the detection of pathologic hyperenhancement, and reduce contrast material and radiation dose compared with conventional CT. Further clinical research and technique refinement will be needed as the usage of these exciting technologies spreads.
Authors: C L Brown; R P Hartman; O P Dzyubak; N Takahashi; A Kawashima; C H McCollough; M R Bruesewitz; A M Primak; J G Fletcher Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Wintermark; P Maeder; F R Verdun; J P Thiran; J F Valley; P Schnyder; R Meuli Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2000 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Akira Kawashima; Terri J Vrtiska; Andrew J LeRoy; Robert P Hartman; Cynthia H McCollough; Bernard F King Journal: Radiographics Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Mitchell E Tublin; Michael E Murphy; David M Delong; Franklin N Tessler; Mark A Kliewer Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Michael Anthony Hurrell; Anthony Philip Howard Butler; Nicholas James Cook; Philip Howard Butler; J Paul Ronaldson; Rafidah Zainon Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: C N De Cecco; V Buffa; S Fedeli; A Vallone; R Ruopoli; M Luzietti; V Miele; M Rengo; M Maurizi Enrici; P Fina; A Laghi; V David Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: John Mongan; Samira Rathnayake; Yanjun Fu; Runtang Wang; Ella F Jones; Dong-Wei Gao; Benjamin M Yeh Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Luke Arentsen; Karen E Hansen; Masashi Yagi; Yutaka Takahashi; Ryan Shanley; Angela McArthur; Patrick Bolan; Taiki Magome; Douglas Yee; Jerry Froelich; Susanta K Hui Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 2.626