Literature DB >> 25034260

Simulated disparity and peripheral blur interact during binocular fusion.

Guido Maiello1, Manuela Chessa2, Fabio Solari2, Peter J Bex3.   

Abstract

We have developed a low-cost, practical gaze-contingent display in which natural images are presented to the observer with dioptric blur and stereoscopic disparity that are dependent on the three-dimensional structure of natural scenes. Our system simulates a distribution of retinal blur and depth similar to that experienced in real-world viewing conditions by emmetropic observers. We implemented the system using light-field photographs taken with a plenoptic camera which supports digital refocusing anywhere in the images. We coupled this capability with an eye-tracking system and stereoscopic rendering. With this display, we examine how the time course of binocular fusion depends on depth cues from blur and stereoscopic disparity in naturalistic images. Our results show that disparity and peripheral blur interact to modify eye-movement behavior and facilitate binocular fusion, and the greatest benefit was gained by observers who struggled most to achieve fusion. Even though plenoptic images do not replicate an individual’s aberrations, the results demonstrate that a naturalistic distribution of depth-dependent blur may improve 3-D virtual reality, and that interruptions of this pattern (e.g., with intraocular lenses) which flatten the distribution of retinal blur may adversely affect binocular fusion.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binocular fusion; blur; disparity; multifocal lenses; natural images

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25034260      PMCID: PMC4106156          DOI: 10.1167/14.8.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  24 in total

1.  Stereoacuity with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Image correlates of crowding in natural scenes.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Time course of visual inhibition during voluntary saccades.

Authors:  F C Volkmann; A M Schick; L A Riggs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1968-04

Review 6.  Multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Roberto Bellucci
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.761

7.  The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays.

Authors:  Takashi Shibata; Joohwan Kim; David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes.

Authors:  Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

10.  Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument.

Authors:  Ron D Hays; Carol M Mangione; Leon Ellwein; Anne S Lindblad; Karen L Spritzer; Peter J McDonnell
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  14 in total

1.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Dynamic lens and monovision 3D displays to improve viewer comfort.

Authors:  Paul V Johnson; Jared Aq Parnell; Joohwan Kim; Christopher D Saunter; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  On the number of perceivable blur levels in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  How to Build a Dichoptic Presentation System That Includes an Eye Tracker.

Authors:  Cheng S Qian; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.

Authors:  Arvind V Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Defocus Discrimination in Video: Motion in Depth.

Authors:  Vincent A Petrella; Simon Labute; Michael S Langer; Paul G Kry
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-21

8.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The (In)Effectiveness of Simulated Blur for Depth Perception in Naturalistic Images.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?

Authors:  Junhan Wei; Deying Kong; Xi Yu; Lili Wei; Yue Xiong; Adeline Yang; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Jiawei Zhou; Yi Gao; Zhifen He
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.