Literature DB >> 27410105

Dynamic lens and monovision 3D displays to improve viewer comfort.

Paul V Johnson, Jared Aq Parnell, Joohwan Kim, Christopher D Saunter, Gordon D Love, Martin S Banks.   

Abstract

Stereoscopic 3D (S3D) displays provide an additional sense of depth compared to non-stereoscopic displays by sending slightly different images to the two eyes. But conventional S3D displays do not reproduce all natural depth cues. In particular, focus cues are incorrect causing mismatches between accommodation and vergence: The eyes must accommodate to the display screen to create sharp retinal images even when binocular disparity drives the eyes to converge to other distances. This mismatch causes visual discomfort and reduces visual performance. We propose and assess two new techniques that are designed to reduce the vergence-accommodation conflict and thereby decrease discomfort and increase visual performance. These techniques are much simpler to implement than previous conflict-reducing techniques. The first proposed technique uses variable-focus lenses between the display and the viewer's eyes. The power of the lenses is yoked to the expected vergence distance thereby reducing the mismatch between vergence and accommodation. The second proposed technique uses a fixed lens in front of one eye and relies on the binocularly fused percept being determined by one eye and then the other, depending on simulated distance. We conducted performance tests and discomfort assessments with both techniques and compared the results to those of a conventional S3D display. The first proposed technique, but not the second, yielded clear improvements in performance and reductions in discomfort. This dynamic-lens technique therefore offers an easily implemented technique for reducing the vergence-accommodation conflict and thereby improving viewer experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27410105      PMCID: PMC5025225          DOI: 10.1364/OE.24.011808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Opt Express        ISSN: 1094-4087            Impact factor:   3.894


  24 in total

1.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses.

Authors:  S Jainta; J Hoormann; W Jaschinski
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Ahna R Girshick; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display.

Authors:  Gordon D Love; David M Hoffman; Philip J W Hands; James Gao; Andrew K Kirby; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 3.894

5.  A novel prototype for an optical see-through head-mounted display with addressable focus cues.

Authors:  Sheng Liu; Hong Hua; Dewen Cheng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.579

6.  Simulated disparity and peripheral blur interact during binocular fusion.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The rate of change of vergence-accommodation conflict affects visual discomfort.

Authors:  Joohwan Kim; David Kane; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays.

Authors:  Takashi Shibata; Joohwan Kim; David M Hoffman; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Creating effective focus cues in multi-plane 3D displays.

Authors:  Sowmya Ravikumar; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Ivana Tošić; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  3 in total

1.  Optimizing virtual reality for all users through gaze-contingent and adaptive focus displays.

Authors:  Nitish Padmanaban; Robert Konrad; Tal Stramer; Emily A Cooper; Gordon Wetzstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Autofocals: Evaluating gaze-contingent eyeglasses for presbyopes.

Authors:  Nitish Padmanaban; Robert Konrad; Gordon Wetzstein
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 14.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.