Literature DB >> 23949955

Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Daniel R Saunders1, Russell L Woods.   

Abstract

Gaze-contingent displays combine a display device with an eyetracking system to rapidly update an image on the basis of the measured eye position. All such systems have a delay, the system latency, between a change in gaze location and the related change in the display. The system latency is the result of the delays contributed by the eyetracker, the display computer, and the display, and it is affected by the properties of each component, which may include variability. We present a direct, simple, and low-cost method to measure the system latency. The technique uses a device to briefly blind the eyetracker system (e.g., for video-based eyetrackers, a device with infrared light-emitting diodes (LED)), creating an eyetracker event that triggers a change to the display monitor. The time between these two events, as captured by a relatively low-cost consumer camera with high-speed video capability (1,000 Hz), is an accurate measurement of the system latency. With multiple measurements, the distribution of system latencies can be characterized. The same approach can be used to synchronize the eye position time series and a video recording of the visual stimuli that would be displayed in a particular gaze-contingent experiment. We present system latency assessments for several popular types of displays and discuss what values are acceptable for different applications, as well as how system latencies might be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23949955      PMCID: PMC4077667          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0375-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  32 in total

1.  Effects of cataract and scotoma on visual acuity: a simulation study.

Authors:  E M Fine; G S Rubin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Extraretinal control of saccadic suppression.

Authors:  M R Diamond; J Ross; M C Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Different motor systems use similar damped extraretinal eye position information.

Authors:  C J Bockisch; J M Miller
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The mask-onset delay paradigm and the availability of central and peripheral visual information during scene viewing.

Authors:  Mackenzie G Glaholt; Keith Rayner; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Gaze-contingent displays: a review.

Authors:  Andrew T Duchowski; Nathan Cournia; Hunter Murphy
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2004-12

6.  Temporal resolution for the perception of features and conjunctions.

Authors:  Clara Bodelón; Mazyar Fallah; John H Reynolds
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Postsaccadic processing of the retinal image during picture scanning.

Authors:  S Shioiri
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

9.  Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  D C Burr; M C Morrone; J Ross
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Gaze-contingent simulation of retinopathy: some potential pitfalls and remedies.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilar; Eric Castet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  23 in total

1.  Trajectory prediction of saccadic eye movements using a compressed exponential model.

Authors:  Peng Han; Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Unconscious priming by illusory figures: the role of the salient region.

Authors:  Tommaso Poscoliero; Carlo Alberto Marzi; Massimo Girelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Simulated disparity and peripheral blur interact during binocular fusion.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The Preferred Retinal Locus Used to Watch Videos.

Authors:  Francisco M Costela; Sidika Kajtezovic; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Juraj Mesik; Stephen A Engel; Rebecca Smith; Mark Schatza; Aurélie Calabrèse; Frederik J van Kuijk; Arthur G Erdman; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Low Vision Enhancement with Head-mounted Video Display Systems: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Ashley D Deemer; Christopher K Bradley; Nicole C Ross; Danielle M Natale; Rath Itthipanichpong; Frank S Werblin; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.

Authors:  Kenneth Holmqvist; Saga Lee Örbom; Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Robert G Alexander; Richard Andersson; Jeroen S Benjamins; Pieter Blignaut; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Lewis L Chuang; Kirsten A Dalrymple; Denis Drieghe; Matt J Dunn; Ulrich Ettinger; Susann Fiedler; Tom Foulsham; Jos N van der Geest; Dan Witzner Hansen; Samuel B Hutton; Enkelejda Kasneci; Alan Kingstone; Paul C Knox; Ellen M Kok; Helena Lee; Joy Yeonjoo Lee; Jukka M Leppänen; Stephen Macknik; Päivi Majaranta; Susana Martinez-Conde; Antje Nuthmann; Marcus Nyström; Jacob L Orquin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Soon Young Park; Stanislav Popelka; Frank Proudlock; Frank Renkewitz; Austin Roorda; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Bonita Sharif; Frederick Shic; Mark Shovman; Mervyn G Thomas; Ward Venrooij; Raimondas Zemblys; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-06

8.  Dynamic gaze-position prediction of saccadic eye movements using a Taylor series.

Authors:  Shuhang Wang; Russell L Woods; Francisco M Costela; Gang Luo
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Monocular and Binocular Contributions to Oculomotor Plasticity.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Defocus Discrimination in Video: Motion in Depth.

Authors:  Vincent A Petrella; Simon Labute; Michael S Langer; Paul G Kry
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.