Literature DB >> 15650577

Multifocal intraocular lenses.

Roberto Bellucci1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) are growing in popularity among patients and surgeons, and opened the way to refractive lens exchange. Still they are not used routinely in cataract surgery, for reasons probably connected to the frequently observed reduction in contrast sensitivity. Recent papers with clinical study outcomes can help in understanding the advantages and the limits of multifocal IOLs. RECENT
FINDINGS: Emerging from every published study, both refractive and diffractive multifocal IOLs usually provide good near visual acuity with distance correction. As many multifocal IOLs are distance-dominant, near vision can be improved by correcting for near the distance focus. The near contrast sensitivity thus obtained is similar to that of monofocal IOLs. Multifocal IOLs have been employed with success in complicated cataract surgery and in trauma cases, with the same outcome as in normal cataract cases. Presbyopic lens exchange remains controversial, with a high success rate in original ametropic eyes, but limited success in original emmetropic eyes. Secondary procedures to improve the refractive outcome are usually of little efficacy in improving patient satisfaction. A new anterior chamber phakic multifocal IOL has been designed to correct presbyopia and small refractive errors. The first clinical results indicate high patient satisfaction, with 7.3% explantation rate.
SUMMARY: Multifocal IOLs can be more widely used after cataract surgery, but should be used with caution in almost emmetropic eyes with little or no cataract. Refractive lens exchange with multifocal IOL is especially worthwhile in hyperopic eyes. The new phakic multifocal IOL adds the concept of reversibility to presbyopic lens exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650577     DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200502000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  29 in total

Review 1.  [Vision with bifocal and multifocal intraocular lenses].

Authors:  K Kirschfeld; M F Land
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Bioptics with multifocal lenses and Lasek].

Authors:  A Liekfeld; L Friederici; P Rieck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Predictive factor and kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation.

Authors:  G Prakash; D R Prakash; A Agarwal; D A Kumar; A Agarwal; S Jacob
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  The role of sensory ocular dominance on through-focus visual performance in monovision presbyopia corrections.

Authors:  Len Zheleznyak; Aixa Alarcon; Kevin C Dieter; Duje Tadin; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceived image quality with simulated segmented bifocal corrections.

Authors:  Carlos Dorronsoro; Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Pablo de Gracia; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Simulated disparity and peripheral blur interact during binocular fusion.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Comparative analysis of the visual and refractive outcomes of a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens with and without toricity: 1-year results.

Authors:  Ryo Shodai; Kazuno Negishi; Hiroyuki Arai; Ikuko Toda; Hidemasa Torii; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  [A new toric diffractive multifocal lens for refractive surgery].

Authors:  A Liekfeld; N Torun; L Friederici
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Wavefront analysis and modulation transfer function of three multifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Marcony R Santhiago; Marcelo V Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz A F Gomes; Arthur Schaefer; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  A contralateral eye study comparing apodized diffractive and full diffractive lenses: wavefront analysis and distance and near uncorrected visual acuity.

Authors:  Marcony Rodrigues de Santhiago; Marcelo Vieira Netto; Jackson Barreto; Beatriz de Abreu Fiuza Gomes; Arthur Schaefer; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.