Literature DB >> 24932535

Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Mark P Little1, Deukwoo Kwon, Kazataka Doi, Steven L Simon, Dale L Preston, Michele M Doody, Terrence Lee, Jeremy S Miller, Diane M Kampa, Parveen Bhatti, James D Tucker, Martha S Linet, Alice J Sigurdson.   

Abstract

Chromosome translocations are a well-recognized biological marker of radiation exposure and cancer risk. However, there is uncertainty about the lowest dose at which excess translocations can be detected, and whether there is temporal decay of induced translocations in radiation-exposed populations. Dosimetric uncertainties can substantially alter the shape of dose-response relationships; although regression-calibration methods have been used in some datasets, these have not been applied in radio-occupational studies, where there are also complex patterns of shared and unshared errors that these methods do not account for. In this article we evaluated the relationship between estimated occupational ionizing radiation doses and chromosome translocation rates using fluorescent in situ hybridization in 238 U.S. radiologic technologists selected from a large cohort. Estimated cumulative red bone marrow doses (mean 29.3 mGy, range 0-135.7 mGy) were based on available badge-dose measurement data and on questionnaire-reported work history factors. Dosimetric assessment uncertainties were evaluated using regression calibration, Bayesian and Monte Carlo maximum likelihood methods, taking account of shared and unshared error and adjusted for overdispersion. There was a significant dose response for estimated occupational radiation exposure, adjusted for questionnaire-based personal diagnostic radiation, age, sex and study group (5.7 translocations per 100 whole genome cell equivalents per Gy, 95% CI 0.2, 11.3, P = 0.0440). A significant increasing trend with dose continued to be observed for individuals with estimated doses <100 mGy. For combined estimated occupational and personal-diagnostic-medical radiation exposures, there was a borderline-significant modifying effect of age (P = 0.0704), but little evidence (P > 0.5) of temporal decay of induced translocations. The three methods of analysis to adjust for dose uncertainty gave similar results. In summary, chromosome translocation dose-response slopes were detectable down to <100 mGy and were compatible with those observed in other radiation-exposed populations. However, there are substantial uncertainties in both occupational and other (personal-diagnostic-medical) doses that may be imperfectly taken into account in our analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24932535      PMCID: PMC4829936          DOI: 10.1667/RR13413.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  57 in total

1.  Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Martha S Linet; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Deukwoo Kwon; R Craig Yoder; Parveen Bhatti; Mark P Little; Preetha Rajaraman; Dunstana Melo; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Robert M Weinstock; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Power and uncertainty analysis of epidemiological studies of radiation-related disease risk in which dose estimates are based on a complex dosimetry system: some observations.

Authors:  Daniel O Stram; Kenneth J Kopecky
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  FISH chromosome aberration analysis on retired radiation workers from the Sellafield nuclear facility.

Authors:  E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Robert E Tarone
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Flexible dose-response models for Japanese atomic bomb survivor data: Bayesian estimation and prediction of cancer risk.

Authors:  James Bennett; Mark P Little; Sylvia Richardson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

6.  Allowing for dose-estimation errors for the A-bomb survivor data.

Authors:  D A Pierce; D L Preston; D O Stram; M Vaeth
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Stable chromosome aberrations in atomic bomb survivors: results from 25 years of investigation.

Authors:  Y Kodama; D Pawel; N Nakamura; D Preston; T Honda; M Itoh; M Nakano; K Ohtaki; S Funamoto; A A Awa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  A Bayesian approach to measurement error problems in epidemiology using conditional independence models.

Authors:  S Richardson; W R Gilks
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Concordance of self-reported and medical chart information on cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Vinay Gupta; Kai Gu; Zhi Chen; Wei Lu; Xiao Ou Shu; Ying Zheng
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  The Diesel Exhaust in Miners Study: V. Evaluation of the Exposure Assessment Methods.

Authors:  Patricia A Stewart; Roel Vermeulen; Joseph B Coble; Aaron Blair; Patricia Schleiff; Jay H Lubin; Mike Attfield; Debra T Silverman
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2012-03-01
View more
  14 in total

1.  Radiation organ doses received in a nationwide cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists: methods and findings.

Authors:  Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Martha S Linet; Jeremy S Miller; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Deukwoo Kwon; R Craig Yoder; Parveen Bhatti; Mark P Little; Preetha Rajaraman; Dunstana Melo; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Robert M Weinstock; Michele M Doody
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation.

Authors:  W Rühm; E Fantuzzi; R Harrison; H Schuhmacher; F Vanhavere; J Alves; J F Bottollier Depois; P Fattibene; Ž Knežević; M A Lopez; S Mayer; S Miljanić; S Neumaier; P Olko; H Stadtmann; R Tanner; C Woda
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Leukaemia and myeloid malignancy among people exposed to low doses (<100 mSv) of ionising radiation during childhood: a pooled analysis of nine historical cohort studies.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; David Borrego; Benjamin French; Lydia B Zablotska; M Jacob Adams; Rodrigue Allodji; Florent de Vathaire; Choonsik Lee; Alina V Brenner; Jeremy S Miller; David Campbell; Mark S Pearce; Michele M Doody; Erik Holmberg; Marie Lundell; Siegal Sadetzki; Martha S Linet; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 18.959

4.  Occupational radiation exposure and risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Cari M Kitahara; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Marie-Odile Bernier; Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; Michele M Doody; David Borrego; Jeremy S Miller; Bruce H Alexander; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Nobuyuki Hamada; Martha S Linet; Craig Meyer
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  Occupational radiation exposure and thyroid cancer incidence in a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists, 1983-2013.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Dale L Preston; Gila Neta; Mark P Little; Michele M Doody; Steven L Simon; Alice J Sigurdson; Bruce H Alexander; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Impact of uncertainties in exposure assessment on thyroid cancer risk among cleanup workers in Ukraine exposed due to the Chornobyl accident.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Natalia Gudzenko; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Maureen Hatch; Alina V Brenner; Vibha Vij; Konstantin Chizhov; Elena Bakhanova; Natalia Trotsyuk; Victor Kryuchkov; Ivan Golovanov; Vadim Chumak; Dimitry Bazyka
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 12.434

Review 7.  Strengths and Weaknesses of Dosimetry Used in Studies of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure and Cancer.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Gerald M Kendall; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Martha S Linet; Harry M Cullings
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2020-07-01

8.  Occupational Radiation Exposure and Deaths From Malignant Intracranial Neoplasms of the Brain and CNS in U.S. Radiologic Technologists, 1983-2012.

Authors:  Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Stephen Balter; Donald L Miller; Preetha Rajaraman; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Raquel Velazquez-Kronen; Steven L Simon; Mark P Little; Michele M Doody; Bruce H Alexander; Dale L Preston
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 6.582

9.  Impact of Uncertainties in Exposure Assessment on Thyroid Cancer Risk among Persons in Belarus Exposed as Children or Adolescents Due to the Chernobyl Accident.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Lydia B Zablotska; Alina V Brenner; Elizabeth K Cahoon; Alexander V Rozhko; Olga N Polyanskaya; Victor F Minenko; Ivan Golovanov; André Bouville; Vladimir Drozdovitch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Utilization of cytogenetic biomarkers as a tool for assessment of radiation injury and evaluation of radiomodulatory effects of various medicinal plants - a review.

Authors:  Ravindra M Samarth; Meenakshi Samarth; Yoshihisa Matsumoto
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.