Literature DB >> 15378837

FISH chromosome aberration analysis on retired radiation workers from the Sellafield nuclear facility.

E Janet Tawn1, Caroline A Whitehouse, Robert E Tarone.   

Abstract

Chromosome analysis using fluorescence in situ hybridization was undertaken on 294 retired workers from the British Nuclear Fuels plc facility at Sellafield, 95 with external occupational exposure <50 mSv, 108 with 50-499 mSv, and 91 with >500 mSv. In univariate analyses, external dose (P <10-s) and age (P = 0.0075) were significantly associated with translocation frequency, but no effect was found for smoking status. In a multivariate analysis with age and external dose as continuous variables, the slopes were 0.017 +/- 0.0075 x 10(-2) translocations per cell per year for age (P = 0.024) and 1.11+/- 0.190 x 10(-2) translocations per cell per sievert for external dose (P < 10(-5)). The dose response for translocation induction for occupational workers is similar to the linear component of in vitro dose-response curves, thus supporting the use of translocation frequency for retrospective biological dosimetry in situations of chronic low-dose exposure occurring over many years. The dose response obtained in this study is lower than the linear component of the dose response for stable chromosome aberrations obtained for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Thus, if chromosome aberration levels are indicative of cancer risk, this would suggest that low-dose risks derived from the Japanese atomic bomb survivor data will overestimate the risks associated with the occupational exposure encountered by the men in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15378837     DOI: 10.1667/rr3214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  12 in total

1.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dose reconstruction for the million worker study: status and guidelines.

Authors:  André Bouville; Richard E Toohey; John D Boice; Harold L Beck; Larry T Dauer; Keith F Eckerman; Derek Hagemeyer; Richard W Leggett; Michael T Mumma; Bruce Napier; Kathy H Pryor; Marvin Rosenstein; David A Schauer; Sami Sherbini; Daniel O Stram; James L Thompson; John E Till; Craig Yoder; Cary Zeitlin
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased chromosome translocations: evidence from three studies.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Lee C Yong; Michele M Doody; Dale L Preston; Diane M Kampa; Marilyn J Ramsey; Elizabeth M Ward; Alan A Edwards; Elaine Ron; James D Tucker; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Increased frequency of chromosome translocations associated with diagnostic x-ray examinations.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Michele M Doody; Dale L Preston; Diane Kampa; Elaine Ron; Robert W Weinstock; Steven Simon; Alan A Edwards; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Association of chromosome translocation rate with low dose occupational radiation exposures in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Deukwoo Kwon; Kazataka Doi; Steven L Simon; Dale L Preston; Michele M Doody; Terrence Lee; Jeremy S Miller; Diane M Kampa; Parveen Bhatti; James D Tucker; Martha S Linet; Alice J Sigurdson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Routine diagnostic X-ray examinations and increased frequency of chromosome translocations among U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Alice J Sigurdson; Parveen Bhatti; Dale L Preston; Michele Morin Doody; Diane Kampa; Bruce H Alexander; Dayton Petibone; Lee C Yong; Alan A Edwards; Elaine Ron; James D Tucker
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Local bone-marrow exposure: how to interpret the data on stable chromosome aberrations in circulating lymphocytes? (some comments on the use of FISH method for dose reconstruction for Techa riverside Residents).

Authors:  Evgenia I Tolstykh; Marina O Degteva; Alexandra V Vozilova; Lynn R Anspaugh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 8.  Do non-targeted effects increase or decrease low dose risk in relation to the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model?

Authors:  M P Little
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  The cellular and molecular carcinogenic effects of radon exposure: a review.

Authors:  Aaron Robertson; James Allen; Robin Laney; Alison Curnow
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Chromosome analysis of nuclear power plant workers using fluorescence in situ hybridization and Giemsa assay.

Authors:  Rositsa Hristova; Valeria Hadjidekova; Mira Grigorova; Teodora Nikolova; Minka Bulanova; Ljubomira Popova; Albena Staynova; Donka Benova
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.